Boss Mongo and TCJ on Various Subjects
BY Herschel Smith15 years, 6 months ago
We have been fairly diligent to propose (and keep proposing) that the high value target campaign in Afghanistan be stopped, Special Operations Forces (SOF) be reattached to infantry, and SOF participate in the softer side of counterinsurgency while infantry also participates in the raids and other kinetics involved in supporting the campaign.
Boss Mongo at Mongo’s Montreaux (I know, cool pseudonym, great name for a web site, I wish I had thought of it first) disagreed.
Let’s talk basics. Conventional Forces, represented here by the Infantry, are regimented, hierarchical, and inflexible. SOF operations and culture–where merit, competence and aptitude often win out over rank–is anathema to CF. As for “no special privileges” like greater authoritiy than CF to call in indirect and air support: those “special privileges” are generated because the force receives special training and has special capabilities. What do you think the S in SOF is for? Is the argument that a 26-year old squad leader should have the same access to the wide array of US effects as a 44-year old, specially trained operator?
If, in our current COIN fights, SOF/GPF integration is so all-fired important, let’s turn the paradigm around: let’s attach infantry companies (commanded by captains) to SF companies (commanded by majors). Better yet, let’s attach infantry battalions to SF Groups and SEAL Teams. That would ensure that the forces are integrated. Of course, the infantry guys would be ruined forever (from thier commander’s point of view) because they’d learn to think for themselves, would prioritize mission accomplishment over placating the command, and would go to the gym and do PT in any clothes they wanted (the horror, the horror).
Starbuck pointed out the case of a sergeant major who admitted to using a multi-million dollar unmanned aerial vehicle to covertly inspect the uniforms of Soldiers at remote combat outposts. Yeah, the organization that promoted that guy and put him in a position of such responsibility and authority could properly utilize SOF.
Well, first of all, let’s distinguish between what I’m suggesting and what I’m not (since it’s impossible to lay out every recommendation and every caveat in a single article). I’ve never understood the heavy land use of SEALs, and it seems to me that they should stay primarily in the water. I don’t deny that there needs to be covert operations, and certainly a relatively small unit of commando-style soldiers needs to be maintained (with robust qualifications – HALO jumps, sniper qualifications, etc.). I do not see the need for Rangers, since airborne qualifications are not unique to them, and air field seizure can be trained at the 82nd and 101st level (my father served in the 82nd). My opinion is that women shouldn’t be allowed to have combat billets, so that problem would be dealt with under my scenario.
Now, to what I have proposed. Much of SOF (not all, and certainly not SF with language skills) can be and should be reattached to infantry. It is in the best interests of a robust military forces for kinetics not to be relegated to certain units, like Thomas P.M. Barnett has proposed with his Leviathan v. Sysadmin.
Boss Mongo gives good reason to question the institutional and bureaucratic makeup and reticence of the U.S. Army, but that’s just an organizational issue, one that can and should be corrected. It works to have force recon and scout sniper attached to Marine infantry. Change is hard, but regardless of what position one takes, it should be recognized what the debate is about. It’s about a division of labor and qualifications into Leviathan and Sysadmin, whether one admits it up front or not. It’s happening, and it has already happened to some extent. The question is whether to reverse it or continue down this path.
Next, Boss Mongo gives us a good rundown on why we must entrust the battle against the insurgency to the ISF. The point is granted, but I still have great reservations in the ISF, and even deeper reservations in the political structure, probably because I am so opposed to Maliki (who has failed to deliver on promises to incorporate the Sons of Iraq into the security apparatus).
But here is one for you. While I cannot attest to this first hand (since I wasn’t there), I interviewed dozens of Marines coming back from Fallujah in 2007 (when my son was deployed). They implicitly trusted the Sons of Iraq and worked with them as IPs. No problems, slept with them, worked with them, ate with them, fought with them (initially against them, and then alongside them against AQ).
The ISF was the problem. Their ranks were filled with lazy ne’er-do-wells and scurrilous, treacherous scumbags. The Marines would only sleep in their vicinity with another armed Marine on watch and separated by concertina wire. There’s the ISF for you.
Finally, Boss takes a shot at Iraqslogger. TCJ agrees and was down on them long ago. After all, what do you expect when someone like Eason Jordan leads the outfit?
TCJ says that Boss Mongo should keep up the good work, keep up the writing, and watch his six.
No comments yet.
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL
Leave a comment