After America Comes North America
BY Herschel Smith
10 years, 5 months ago
General David Petraeus, the former CIA director and head of the international forces in Afghanistan (ISAF), has today said that the United States is suffering deeply because of partisanship, and said that the country needs immigration reform.
Gen. Petraeus was speaking on the “After America, What?” panel at the Centre for Policy Studies’ Margaret Thatcher Liberty Conference at the Guildhall in the City of London.
“After America comes North America,” he said, discussing how Canada, the United States and Mexico are set to be a formidable force together, “notwithstanding Mexico’s rule of law issues”.
We’ve discussed it many times before. The alleged need for immigrants pertains to the desires of corporations to have low paid workers. It doesn’t enrich you or me, it enriches the rich (heads of corporations, boards of directors, and so on).
Here’s how it works. It helps the corporate bottom line by forcing the middle class to pick up the tab for medical care, which burden happens largely on the backs of nurses in emergency rooms (my daughter is a nurse in an ER), with medical insurance premiums escalating in order to pay for the service. Food stamps (so called SNAP) also factor into the calculus, as well as driver’s insurance (for uninsured motorists coverage).
It isn’t that there is no cost for low paid workers. It’s that the cost is borne by the middle class as welfare to corporations and the wealthy. The GOP is connected at the hip to such interests in terms of money, while the Democrats are connected in terms of future voters. With such powerful interests at stake, it should be obvious why the Southern border is a sieve and illegals are left in the country unmolested.
But Petraeus is at least honest, admitting what many of the politicians don’t want to confess. They see America more as an idea, or an endless checkbook, rather than a place with people and borders. The idea they cherish is one of wealth propagation among the elite (for the GOP), or power in perpetuity (for the Democrats). The idea of the constitution has long ago lost its appeal.
Petraeus advocates “immigration reform,” but he refers to North America as America’s replacement, almost as if it’s a foregone conclusion rather something he needs to advocate. But such a thing will bring about the end of the middle class as we know it.
With trillions of dollars in unfunded liabilities, a behemoth socialized medical system (with millions of new immigrants added to the rolls), and a fiat money system which existence relies on the printing presses, the system cannot go on for much longer.
North America. Increasingly it will take on the face of gang members. Welcome your newest neighbor – affiliates of MS13. They think you owe them a living. Said one of them.
‘You’re going to let me go, just like you let my mother go, just like you let my sister go. You’re going to let me go as well, and the government’s going to take care of us
Prepare.
|
|
On June 19, 2014 at 8:04 am, MattBracken said:
It’s called TREASON.
The other Quisling traitor was SHOT for this by the Norwegians in 1945.
U.S. Constitution, Article IV, Section 4:
The United States shall guarantee to every state
in this union a republican form of government,
and shall protect each of them against invasion
On June 20, 2014 at 5:23 pm, SFTOBEY said:
Thank you, Matt. Exactly what part of “invasion” don’t they understand?
On June 20, 2014 at 6:55 pm, MattBracken said:
Liberals use definitions as part of their armory. To liberals, only D-day is an “invasion.” Simarly, only full citizenship granted outright is an “amnesty,” all other unstoppable step-wise “paths to citizenship” are not “amensty.” I say, we get to define both invasion and amnesty.
On June 20, 2014 at 8:35 pm, Bill Cleveland said:
Gents – we may define until the cows come home. Eventually we will have to put some horse under the hat and go wolf hunting. Only question is how soon. Do we wait to become victims and/or targets for the forces of treason? Hard questions – hard answers. It’s not personal yet, to enuf people to kick off the dance. Fascinating times to live in, don’t ya think? How do you define enuf is to much? Clock your six and keep your flanks swept boys. You won’t get no special wigwag when it does turn personal. .
On June 19, 2014 at 8:05 am, Paul B said:
Welfare, in all its forms, should be shut down. Take the pain now so we won’t have the pain later.
Course there is no political power and less graft opportunities that way.
On June 19, 2014 at 11:20 am, Archer said:
Agreed. Constitutionally-speaking, they government had/has no power to set up such a scheme, let alone maintain and expand it. That didn’t stop them.
Tell me how “regulat[ing] interstate commerce” includes forcibly taking resources from one group – without recompense, I might add – and giving it to another.
On June 19, 2014 at 5:08 pm, LibertyFirst said:
Concur. Don’t put out a saucer of milk and complain about having cats on your porch. When the free ride goes away, the only people showing up here will want to work.
On June 20, 2014 at 1:19 am, Feet2Fire said:
“Don’t put out a saucer of milk and complain about having cats on your porch.”
Yeah, but the people putting out the milk are not the ones PAYING for the milk, so what do they care how many “cats” get in?
On June 19, 2014 at 8:17 am, Fed Up said:
This is an invasion.
On June 19, 2014 at 12:02 pm, Josh said:
All three branches of government, and all the massive corporations are in an outright CLAMOR for mass immigration of Mexico. It’s unbeleivable and crosses party boundaries as you said. Why the middle class isn’t gutting the legislature and tearing apart massive corporate monopolies, oligopolies and conglomerates is utterly beyond me.
Everyone has their heads buried in their smartphones and TV’s and brand new cars, just the way the government and corporations want. We’re getting the government/nation we deserve, and we’re going to pay dearly for our collective sin of innaction.
On June 20, 2014 at 1:21 am, Feet2Fire said:
What’s ironic is, while they are clamoring for CHEAP LABOR and willing to sell out their country in an effort to get it, they don’t seem to be paying attention to all the B.S. about “income inequality” and “raising minimum wages”… When will the TRAITORS LEARN THAT THEY ARE DEALING WITH UNSCRUPULOUS TRAITORS THEMSELVES?
On June 19, 2014 at 5:31 pm, Frederick P Blume Jr said:
http://www.thenewamerican.com/freedomindex/pdf/MergerInTheMaking.pdf
On June 19, 2014 at 6:19 pm, bruceapilot said:
Well… That sucks. Patraeus is speaking in a manner which identifies him as dismissive of the US Constitution he is sworn to protect. That is nothing less than treason.
On June 19, 2014 at 6:25 pm, bruceapilot said:
Anybody know where I can get a Guilley Suit cheap? I’ve got everything else I need to support the U.S. Constitution, Article IV, Section 4.
On June 20, 2014 at 12:50 am, WalkingHorse said:
You can *make* a Ghillie suit, using burlap that you fray by hand. Our son did so when he was 14, and it turned out very well.
On June 20, 2014 at 4:49 pm, katzkiner said:
Sportsmans Guide
On June 20, 2014 at 1:23 am, Feet2Fire said:
And why, pray tell, are WE involved in anything entitled “AFTER AMERICA…” ???
Interesting that the general spouts off about POST-AMERICA while he is OFF OUR SOIL! Two-timing weasel!
On June 20, 2014 at 2:51 am, SgianDubh said:
“It’s a Republic Madam, if you can keep it.”
— Benjamin Franklin upon completing the Constitution
On June 20, 2014 at 11:33 am, bloodyspartan said:
It is up to us to keep it not the Traitors .
We must destroy them before they destroy us.
On June 22, 2014 at 8:32 pm, GenEarly said:
We couldn’t. Not all on our watch though, the Progressives started in the early 1900’s and haven’t really ever stopped. The Civil War ensconced the Federal Gov. as the final arbiter of power, Lincoln actually killed the Constitution along with 350,000 Americans, if the truth be allowed.
On June 20, 2014 at 6:22 am, robins111 said:
I wonder how the libs in the states would react if 250,000 Canadian conservatives showed up at your north border demanding in and wanting to vote?
On June 20, 2014 at 7:15 am, Coldsteel1983 said:
Here we go. Hence the ratcheting up of the classification of any dissenters or resistors as “terrorists”. Harry Reid’s words were not hastily put together, this is what the believe. Look up the bit in the Seattle paper about “Redskins”. The writer is quite clear that they aren’t interested in what you think or have to say, that the matter is “too important” to be left to “democracy”. TPTB are fully intent on making the rules and only care that you sit down and shut up. Or else.
If your not willing to be part of North America or don’t owe these bastards any more tha a couple is 230 grain bits of precious metal, get your mind wrapped around this and get your family and body ready for a fight.
Coldsteel…
On June 20, 2014 at 10:10 am, NHPatriot1776 said:
Anyone who thinks they are going to vote their way out of this doesn’t see the big picture.
On June 20, 2014 at 11:32 am, squareWave said:
I genuinely LOL’d at his comment about “Mexico’s rule of law issues.” What about OUR rule of law issues?
On June 20, 2014 at 2:32 pm, Pat Hines said:
I posted this on my FB Timeline with the following statement.
“This is why the Mexican, and other, invaders must be made to leave our lands. In this case, Zero Tolerance is the order of the day.
While I’d advocate they self deport, or peacefully allow themselves to be taken elsewhere, if that’s not possible, the amount of force necessary to accomplish this shall be used, including force that may be lethal.
We MUST do this.”
On June 20, 2014 at 4:11 pm, Jimmy the Saint said:
” The GOP is connected at the hip to such interests in terms of money, while the Democrats are connected in terms of future voters. ”
The Dems are equally connected to corporate interests in terms of money, if not more. That they get the future voters is just icing on the cake (and further proof of which party is completely deluded as to its future chances of survival).
On June 22, 2014 at 8:25 pm, GenEarly said:
Really only One Big Tent Progressive Party supporting their NWO Bankster masters.
On June 20, 2014 at 5:01 pm, TimeHasCome said:
This is the same Petraues that couldn’t even control his own Pecker with his mistress Paula . He never saw any fighting until he was 52 years old! He married the daughter ( Holly) of the West Point Commander 40 years ago.
He was sending his Chick Pal Paula 3,000 texts a month . It was Barney Fife at FBI Headquarters figured out that these texts on secure lines should not be happening.
On June 20, 2014 at 6:05 pm, Nightshade said:
Betrayus indeed!
This is nothing short of Lebesraum for non-Americans. The only question is, how far are the politicians and their corporate backers are willing to go? As far as an American Aushwitz?
On June 20, 2014 at 9:58 pm, Gunny G Alz said:
Betray-us was at the Bilderberg meeting in 2014. Just another elite one-worlder.
On June 20, 2014 at 11:08 pm, jony101 said:
petreaus is an idiot. All these perfumed generals think they know everything. His victory in iraq which he always brags about, wasnt such a big victory after all. At least he did bring gays into the military, that was his true accomplishment and major victory, and the great CIC warrior obama rewarded him with the cia post, too bad he couldnt keep his pants zipped up..
On June 21, 2014 at 9:09 pm, StukaPilot said:
looks like Paula Kranz, alias “Broadwell”, did quite a number on the ex-General. Now a well-paid PR man for the Z.O.G. And it’s not the “middle class” that’s in the globalist gunsight; it’s long gone and living on debt, same as the welfare class. It’s the Whites.
On June 22, 2014 at 8:21 pm, GenEarly said:
NWO Generals move on from the USSA to set up the next step, comrades. The only remaining question I have; Are there any Patriots left at all?……..