Recent SWAT Antics In The Service Of Our Great Country
BY Herschel Smith9 years, 10 months ago
SWATting prank terrorizes family:
ST. CLOUD, Minn. — Josh Peters knew what was happening the instant he heard his mother’s frantic voice.
It was around 1 a.m. on Feb. 4, and Peters, 27, was hosting an online stream as he played a video game, “Clash of Clans.” Peters makes a living as “Koopatroopa787,” the host of a channel on the website Twitch.tv, where more than 50,000 gamers watch him play and interact with him.
He had noise-canceling headphones on, so he only barely heard the commotion upstairs, hurried footsteps to the basement, and his mom shouting to him that the police were at the house. But Peters, who returned from a tour of duty with the Air Force in Kuwait last November, stayed calm and paused his stream. He knew why they were there.
“Right away, I knew I was being swatted,” he said.
St. Cloud police had received an anonymous call reporting an active shooter incident with a woman’s life in danger at Peters’ address, according to Lieutenant Jeff Oxton. It’s called “swatting,” and is a prank growing more common in the gaming community. Oxton said this was not the first swatting call St. Cloud police have responded to. Peters had heard of it happening to plenty of others, but never imagined he would be the target.
Kristin Darnall, Peters’ mother, was asleep when she heard pounding on the door. She looked out the window and saw police lights flashing. She went downstairs and saw through a window on the door several officers with weapons drawn.
Her husband came downstairs to let the officers in, but when he reached to undo the complex lock on the door, police yelled at him to keep his hands in the air. Peters was upstairs by this point. When the door was finally opened, Darnall said, police threw her husband and Josh to the floor. She stood with her back pressed against the wall, trying to ask what was happening … Oxton said police have to respond to these types of calls as if they are real.
Darnall said her 10-year old son, in the days since the incident, had suffered a migraine, had been play-acting the scenario with Nerf guns, and had woken with “night terrors.”
Police pull weapons on six year old autistic boy:
A Jackson couple says Ridgeland police pointed a weapon at their 6-year-old autistic son while serving a warrant on a family member in the home.
Paul and Angela Thompson Roby told WLBT that Ridgeland officers arrived in an unmarked car at a home owned by Angela Roby’s mother on Brisbane Lane. They were looking for Carneigio Gray, 23, who is Angela Roby’s brother.
Ridgeland spokesman Lt. John Neal said officers had received information that Gray, who has an outstanding warrant for contempt of court for failure to appear on a three-year-old paraphernalia charge, was staying in that house. When they entered the home, he resisted arrest.
That’s when the Robys said their son asked officers not to hurt his uncle. They told WLBT that officers then drew their weapons on the child.
DEA agent shot in pre-dawn “drug raid”:
COLUMBIA, SC — A criminal trial expected to be closely watched by law enforcement and gun owners around South Carolina opens Monday in federal court in Columbia.
At issue: whether Joel Robinson, 32, is guilty of a crime for shootinga DEA agent in the first few seconds of a surprise federal law enforcement raid last October at his Orangeburg house.
Agents expected to find a cache of drugs, but a search of the premises found nothing but a small amount of marijuana for recreational use, according to legal records in the case.
Robinson is expected to claim self-defense, saying he did what any citizen would have in assuming he was the target of a home invasion – grabbing a gun and firing a half-dozen shots in the direction of those he assumed were home invaders.
But the person struck by a Robinson bullet was DEA agent Barry Wilson, one of more than a dozen law officers surrounding the house. The bullet broke bones in Wilson’s right elbow and forearm. His recovery likely will take more than a year and he is expected to lose some use of that arm, according to testimony in a pretrial hearing.
During the trial, the prosecution is expected to claim that law officers on the scene announced themselves loudly, initiated flashing blue lights and sirens as they broke a side window in the house, and that, in any case, it is against the law to shoot a federal law officer in the performance of his official duties.
In the first case, the only real danger that night was from cops who pointed weapons at innocent people. No muzzle discipline is characteristic of this kind of tactic, and if this kind of lack of self restraint occurred on any range we regularly visit, most of us would beat the hell out of the perpetrator(s), or at least disarm them and make it clear they were never invited back.
In the second case, what is there really to say, except that the autistic boy was probably about as dangerous as the 95 year old man who was shot to death by cops in a nursing home.
These aren’t even all of the instances of such tactics, just three of the more prominent and recent. It’s as if reporting of this gruesome tactic is becoming dull and tedious. But in spite of the poor little autistic boy who was probably scared to death and certainly didn’t need this terror, the most legally interesting is the last one.
The salient observation here is that it is illegal to shoot a cop in the performance of his duty. And note that his “duty” is anything they want it to be, including home invasions in the middle of the night (with the cops looking like gang hoodlums with their faces covered) where the victim knows nothing about the event except that he and his family are in danger.
What this does – the notion that we cannot shoot home invaders for fear that we will shoot a cop in the performance of his duty, even if it is a wrong address raid – is effectively disarm innocent people. You can have all of the guns and ammunition you want, but if you can be hauled before court at any time for using them to defend your home, you may as well have nothing unless you’re willing to shoot back and accept the consequences. It’s almost as if this is all designed to create a passive class of sheep, no?
A man’s home is his castle … indeed!
On February 10, 2015 at 4:39 am, Roger V. Tranfaglia said:
If your asleep when they “announce” them selves its your FAULT??????…BULLSHIT
On February 10, 2015 at 8:34 am, Pat Hines said:
I’ve already made the decision as to what I will do if there’s a night time raid at my house. I will shoot as many of “them” as I possibly can no matter what they claim to be. Announcing themselves as cops in the middle of the night is NOT sufficient to prevent my action.
The above is because I’m not doing unlawful activities, unlawful meaning against normal laws, at my home. I don’t do drugs that are against the law here, I don’t make them here either, nor do I make threats against any public official, or stalk anyone.
That means that any midnight raid here will be treated for what it is, a home invasion. Further, as time goes by, that will be extended to my entire neighborhood.
On February 10, 2015 at 11:01 am, Ned Weatherby said:
When they raid my house, they’ll kill the dogs first. I won’t have to shoot anyone – my wife will handle it. Don’t eff with her dogs.
The simple fact is, they can always find something wrong. Got prescription medicine in one of those daily dose boxes that pharmacies sell? Illegal to put a prescription in a container that is not labeled from the pharmacy.
Have a shotgun and a hacksaw? You have the makings of an SBR. Got reloading equipment? Potential bomb making equipment. Have a pressure cooker in the kitchen? I’m sure they can come up with something.
One of my best friends was a LEO after he got out of Vietnam. He trusts cops less than anyone I know. That’s from reading the paper, and news stories like these. He can’t believe what has happened in law enforcement over the past 20 years.
Remember the old adage: Give a man a hammer and every problem looks like a nail? Seems to fit here. Give every jurisdiction a SWAT team, and every problem looks like a terrorist enclave which must be breached with armored vehicles breaking down walls, grenades to toss in children’s cribs, every toddler is a threat, every dog causes these panophobic pansies the vapors, so they must “neutralize the threat” lest they faint from fright.
Interesting how a gang of steroided up JBT’s are so damn eskeered of, well, everything, and how everything causes them too fear for their life. Good thing meter readers and postmen don’t suffer from that. Maybe meter readers should volunteer to have LEO’s do “ride alongs” so the LEO’s can experience a day of terror that, say, the lady who reads our gas meter suffers daily.
On February 10, 2015 at 9:46 pm, UNCLEELMO said:
Great post, Ned. Thanks.
On February 12, 2015 at 10:06 am, Ned Weatherby said:
Thanks Uncle.
On February 10, 2015 at 8:20 pm, GenEarly said:
In the 2nd case the law infringement was neglible and could have been handled during the daytime in a civilized manner. Some SS wannabe just wanted to “suit up” and “get some” to have a reason for existing.