Clarity on Iranian Nuclear Program and IAEA Reports
BY Herschel Smith17 years, 11 months ago
There is much confusion over the recently released International Atomic Energy Agency (hereafter, IAEA) report on the Iranian nuclear program. The International Herald Tribune is reporting that the “International Atomic Energy Agency experts have found unexplained plutonium and highly enriched uranium traces in a nuclear waste facility in Iran and have asked Tehran for details, an IAEA report said Tuesday.” Reuters is reporting that “IAEA inspectors detected bits of plutonium in samples of particles of highly enriched uranium (HEU) taken earlier from containers at the Karaj atomic waste facility near Tehran.”
To gain clarity on these issues, one needs access to documents and analysis other than main stream media reports and disjointed accounts of the situation. The IAEA has a page devoted to formal statements on Iran. The story begins long ago, but it is necessary to go back at least to January of 2006 to understand the November report.
In January of 2006, IAEA inspectors found some high enriched Uranium particles at locations where Iran has declared that centrifuge components had been manufactured, used and/or stored. In the same report, the IAEA said “in order to clarify differences between findings by the Agency and statements made by Iran, a number of plutonium discs were brought by the Agency back to to Vienna for further analysis to determine the exact isotopic composition of the plutonium. The Agency’s analysis showed, in particular, that the Pu-240 content measured on eight of the discs was significantly lower than the Pu-240 content of the solution from which the plutonium deposited on the discs was said to have originated.”
In a report on August 31, 2006, the IAEA reiterated the complaint (lodged in earlier reports) that Iran had refused to cooperate in ascertaining the origin of the high enriched uranium particles found and discussed in the February report. The IAEA also confirmed the laboratory results of the sample, stating that “Analysis of the environmental samples taken from equipment at a technical university in January 2006, referred to in paragraph 25 of GOV/2006/27, showed a small number of particles of natural and high enriched uranium.”
The IAEA prepares reports for board review prior to meetings, and the board decides on release of the reports to the public as one of the functions of the meeting. The November 14, 2006 report (GOV/2006/64) has not been formally released yet, but Vital Perspective has obtained the report and has posted a link to it. In this report the IAEA divulges that the test results had been communicated to Iran: “Under cover of the Agency’s letter of 16 October 2006 … Iran was provided with a detailed assessment of the results of further analysis of the samples taken from the containers at Karaj, and was requested to provide further clarification of the presence of the HEU particles and clarification of an additional finding of plutonium in the samples. On 13 November 2006, Iran provided a response to that request, which the Agency is currently assessing.”
Iran’s reponse is nothing but a subterfuge. Nothing technical, detailed, meaningful or substantive is contained in the response. Further, there is technical falsehood contained in the response. From the Reuters article cited above, Iran has included this in their reponse: “the HEU could have come from spent fuel from a Tehran light-water research reactor.”
The IAEA has found a plutonium ‘vector’ (i.e., isotopic composition) on certain components that is different from the alleged source. They have also found highly enriched uranium particles, leading to significant concerns over the enrichment process. As we have discussed before, highly enriched uranium does not come from spent fuel. Low enriched uranium (5% or lower) is used to fuel and operate commercial light water reactors, but highly enriched uranium (>> 90%) is used for only two purposes: Naval reactors (Submarines and Aircraft Carriers), for which Iran does not have the technology, and nuclear weapons. HEU has these two purposes, and no more. HEU comes from the enrichment process, not from spent fuel.
Finally, we have covered the issue of Iran’s heavy water reactor and the fact that the alleged medical use of heavy water is a lie. Heavy water will be used, upon completion of Iran’s reactor, to create plutonium for nuclear weapons.
Despite the hyperventilating media reports, the discovery of HEU particles and plutonium is nothing new. There is no need for a new discovery. The old ones – and the test results, and Iran’s refusal to come clean about them – is enough.
No comments yet.
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL
Leave a comment