The Ebb and Flow of IED Warfare: U.S. Lives are at Stake
BY Herschel Smith
17 years, 7 months ago
Due in part to a failure to listen adequately to Eric Shinseki and Anthony Zinni regarding Iraq war planning, along with premature cessation of conventional operations (bypassing large urban areas leading to costly MOUT later in the war) and halting invocation or implementation of counterinsurgency TTPs, the Iraq campaign has been problematic. In Concerning the Failure of Counterinsurgency in Iraq, I said “we were utterly unprepared for the toll that IEDs would take on U.S. troops, and even after it became obvious that this was a leading tactic of the enemy, we reacted with lethargy.” IEDs became one of the two most effective weapons of the insurgents, specifically because of two reasons: their cheap and ready availability, and the fact that they are a stand-off weapon, something unthinkable for the insurgents 40 or 50 years ago.
Sometimes the most effective countermeasure to the tactics of the insurgency is human manpower. The Government Accounting Office tells us just how this is relevant for Operation Iraqi Freedom.
Unattended Iraqi ammunition depots provide the majority of explosives used by insurgents to attack U.S. and coalition troops with improvised explosive devices, according to a Government Accountability Office report released April 27.
“There’s an unknown number of sites that remain unsecured today,
No comments yet.
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL
Leave a comment