Replacing Kenneth Melson At ATF Is Not Enough
BY Herschel Smith13 years, 6 months ago
According to the WSJ, acting director Kenneth Melson’s head may be on the chopping block over the AFT gunrunner scandal.
The Justice Department is expected to oust the head of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, according to people familiar with the matter, amid a troubled federal antitrafficking operation that has grown into the agency’s biggest scandal in nearly two decades.
Moves toward the replacement of Kenneth Melson, acting ATF director since April 2009, could begin next week, although the precise sequence of events remains to be decided, these people said.
The shakeup shows the extent of the political damage caused by the gun-trafficking operation called Fast and Furious, which used tactics that allowed suspected smugglers to buy large numbers of firearms. Growing controversy over the program has paralyzed a long-beleaguered agency buffeted by partisan battles. The ATF has been without a Senate-confirmed director since 2006, with both the Bush and Obama administrations unable to overcome opposition from gun-rights groups to win approval of nominees.
In November, President Barack Obama nominated Andrew Traver, the head of the ATF’s Chicago office, as permanent ATF director. The nomination stalled in the Senate after the National Rifle Association said Mr. Traver had a “demonstrated hostility” to the rights of gun owners.
Mr. Traver is set to travel to Washington on Tuesday to meet with Attorney General Eric Holder and Deputy Attorney General James Cole, the people said. The administration is weighing whether to name Mr. Traver as acting director or choose another interim chief while awaiting Senate action on his nomination, they said.
The administration is attempting to handle three issues with one move. First, the Obama administration is attempting to salvage what it can from the horribly failed project gunrunner and throw out a sacrificial lamb to the Congress. We all know this. Second, they are attempting to conduct another battlefield ruse. This is merely a flanking action designed to help stop the Congressional frontal assault on the administration and justice department. The WSJ article quotes Jim Carney again denying that Mr. Obama knew anything about the project. But there is indication that there was understanding and approval not only from the justice department but also from the White House. How high does the knowledge go? Who knew about this in the White House, and when did s/he know it? A special prosecutor is needed to flesh out these details. It simply isn’t acceptable to throw Kenneth Melson under the bus and walk away from this. Accountability must start at the very top and go to the very bottom of the chain of command on this.
Third – and perhaps more significant than any of these goals – the administration sees this as a timely opportunity to slip in Andrew Traver to the ATF. Andrew Traver’s views are extreme, and he even wants the Centers for Disease Control to have oversight of the firearms industry. If the administration cannot get what they wanted out of gunrunner, they intend to install someone else even more anti-firearm than Melson at the head of ATF. Not only is there no repentance for sins committed, there isn’t even the hint of an attempt to change. Several dead ATF agents and Mexican authorities, Melson thrown under the bus, a Congressional investigation, international embarrassment, and firearms flooding Mexico from this whole ugly affair – they are all just a few “broken eggs” for real change this administration intends to bring.
Prior:
The Deepening Project Gunrunner Scandal
Senators Feinstein, Schumer and Whitehouse on Halting U.S. Firearms Trafficking to Mexico
Project Gunrunner: White House and DoJ Knowledge and Oversight
On June 20, 2011 at 12:26 am, Fred said:
Why aren’t the people involved being indicted for murder?
On June 20, 2011 at 11:12 am, TS Alfabet said:
It would not be surprising in the least if Obama was involved.
The only real question is how involved. Did he merely assent to the general notion behind the sting operation but without any knowledge of the actual program, or did he specifically approve it?
Given that Obama goes for a month or more without getting any briefings from his economic advisers while never failing to make it out to the golf course, I tend to believe he was in this matter (as in everything else he does) clueless.
That should not mean he should not be held responsible.
Special prosecutor, please!
On June 20, 2011 at 11:16 am, TS Alfabet said:
Also…
Let’s put this in perspective. When the Democrats controlled Congress and Bush was in the WH, a special prosecutor was appointed to get to the bottom of who revealed Valerie Plame’s identity as a CIA agent.
The Valerie Plame who outed herself to the Media long before anyone else. The Valerie Plame who was not even an active, covert agent in any sense. The Valerie Plame who was outed by a Democrat diplomat. And what was the damage to this outing? Nothing.
But the Special Prosecutor was appointed nonetheless.