Today’s Reading
BY Herschel Smith11 years, 5 months ago
“Apparently Square is joining several other payment processors and financial institutions and are now refusing to do business with anyone who has anything to do with guns, ammo or other weapons,” the Guns Save Lives blog observed, adding “Paypal has long had a standing policy of refusing to business with any gun related business, including for things as innocuous as gun magazines. GE Capital, one of the largest lenders in the US recently announced they would no longer work with the gun industry as well.”
“We may decide not to authorize or settle any transaction that you submit to us if we believe that the transaction is in violation of this Agreement,” Square warns its users.
David is covering financial companies who refuse to do business with firearms buyers and sellers. This is one reason we have tried to close out our bank account with Bank of America. We’re about there.
At the state level, exploiters of murdered children have over the last few months parlayed the Sandy Hook Elementary atrocity into magazine and “assault weapon” bans–in some cases confiscatory bans–and have castigated Congress for not following the same unconstitutional path at the federal level. 3-D printing has already spelled the doom for the effectiveness of such bans, as well as background check requirements and other restrictions on “assault weapon” sales.
We will ultimately win, and I think that’s Kurt’s point. As for this whole 3D printing issue, I am thus far not impressed enough to do anything more than distribute the files if someone sends them to me. I’ll stick to what I’ve got and what I plan to get until further advancements in technology (and those advancements will come). But the paranoia made me more interested than I otherwise would have been. If the government forbids having the files, I want them. If you can’t distribute them, I want to be a clearinghouse for them.
Via Say Uncle, another New Yorker will be prosecuted for the ridiculous law.
An upstate man was arrested under the state’s new gun law when troopers found him with a legally registered pistol that had a magazine that held nine bullets – two more than the new statute allows, state police said.
Troopers from the New Lebanon barracks in Columbia County stopped a car driven by Gregory D. Dean Jr., 31, of Hopewell Junction, around 9:45 p.m. Sunday on Route 22 because the vehicle’s license-plate lamp was not working.
While interviewing Dean, troopers noticed a handgun on the front seat, partially covered by a sweatshirt.
The troopers determined the gun, a .40-caliber pistol, was legally registered and possessed. However, when the troopers inspected the pistol, its magazine contained the nine bullets – New York’s Secure Ammunition and Firearms Enforcement Actonly allows seven bullets per magazine.
Police charged Dean with unlawful possession of certain ammunition feeding devices, third-degree aggravated unlicensed operation,both misdemeanors, plus vehicle infractions, police said.
Ah, there we go again calling a cartridge a bullet, and New York’s finest spending time shutting down violent gangs on tax money … er uh … harassing gun owners on tax money.
Maryland Shall Issue has filed a lawsuit against the State Police. The gist of it is that the police are taking an average of 55 days to issue permits, while the statutory command is that they do so within 7 days.
But Dave. They’re the police. They can do what they want to. If they can shoot innocent people in SWAT raids, no one will care if they don’t issue carry permits when the law says they must. By the way, Maryland is one of those states through which I will not drive, and over which I will not fly.
On May 13, 2013 at 10:13 pm, Matt said:
The PayPal thing is funny. When I was working there last year, there were a number of the sharpest developers they had who were gun nuts. I find it amusing that they don’t even pay attention to their employees on the subject.
On May 13, 2013 at 11:39 pm, DAN III said:
Another example of the cops, NY state troopers in this case, doing what their political masters dictate.
Now, why did the driver even allow them an opportunity to inspect the pistol ? Again, the 4th Amendment down the shitter as those troopers were doing more than asking for “license and registration”.
Anyone with a badge is not one’s friend. Then again, not all NAZIS were bad.
On May 17, 2013 at 7:32 am, Bill said:
@DAN. Knowing NY police, I don’t think he “allowed” the inspection so much as was told he’d be killed if he blinked.