Gun Laws: Let The Market Speak
BY Herschel Smith11 years, 5 months ago
Daniele Perazzi, president of the Italian Perazzi Shotguns firm, was taken into custody yesterday by Adams County Deputies [see update, below] along with several prototype shotguns. The executive was picked up in the parking lot of the Denver Merchandise Mart, hosting the high-end Colorado Gun Collectors show this weekend, after a taxi driver, likely reacting to a suspicious activity reporting outreach program conducted by law enforcement, told authorities he thought he could be transporting an armed “foreign speaking” terror suspect.
Continue reading to find out why the Sheriff asked him to leave town despite the fact that he had done nothing wrong.
… the Personalized Handgun Safety Act of 2013, mandates within two years that newly manufactured handguns be equipped with the technology that allows the guns to only work in the hands of their owners or other authorized users. Manufacturers that do not meet the standards could be held liable. And individuals or businesses selling older handguns must have them retrofitted with personalization technology within three years after the bill is enacted, at the expense of the federal government.
This bill has little chance of passing, but even if it did, the author isn’t even smart enough to exempt LEOs, who won’t endorse it without that exemption. Kurt discusses the law enforcement take on such laws.
Both of these issues fall into the category where I advocate letting the market decide who wins. Colorado has made their bed and must now lie in it. They will eventually repudiate their onerous laws when enough industry leaves, enough industry won’t consider coming, and enough gangs begin to terrorize the state, but the rich part is that they will learn by doing rather than by being told what to do. If I was Mr. Perazzi I wouldn’t waste one more dime or second on Colorado. I’d never return, and I’d do my best to ensure that my wares were never sold in that state. We need not fill in the gap for the intentional failures of others. It interferes with the learning process.
As for smart guns, as I said before, I advocate at least one manufacturer investing significant resources to develop the technology and see how the market treats their brainchild. Will it be alive and kicking, or stillborn? Perhaps the Obama administration should spend a billion dollars on such technology. Will we be able to track another Solyndra in the making?
I’ve already inveighed against smart guns, saying that I’ll buy one when hell freezes over. Are there enough people out there to make this a worthwhile investment? In particular, I strongly recommend that H&K be the first one out of the gate.
Prior:
No comments yet.
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL
Leave a comment