University Student Who Had Guns On Campus Gets Two Years In Jail
BY Herschel Smith10 years, 2 months ago
A college student who was arrested after being found with two handguns on campus and a rifle in his SUV pled guilty to weapons charges Friday in what supporters call a big misunderstanding.
William Dong, 23, the now-former University of New Haven student said he carried the handguns for protection against mass shootings but ran afoul of both federal and state charges when it was discovered he had what Connecticut law classifies as an “assault rifle.” He was arrested in 2013 on campus with the two handguns in his possession while a third gun, a Bushmaster rifle, was locked in his SUV just off campus. Dong, who worked at the time for an armored car company, had a clean record and had permits for his firearms, was the subject of a police manhunt on campus after a homeless woman saw the rifle in his vehicle at drugstore near campus and called police.
This led at the time to a campus lockdown until police found Dong and took him into custody. Upon a search of his room, police found newspaper clippings of various mass shootings, which in itself is not a crime but was seized upon by local media. When the smoke cleared, he faced charges for one count of illegal sale or transport of an assault weapon and two counts of having a firearm on unauthorized premises since the university had prohibited guns even with a permit, for which he pled guilty Friday.
“Today’s guilty plea brings an end to a potential tragedy that was prevented due to Connecticut’s new gun safety laws,” read a statement released by Connecticut Gov. Dannel Malloy (D) just as the plea was announced.
Of course, Malloy is lying. The operative word here is “potential,” and under this calculus, the fact that a traffic light turned red at the right time, causing a taxi to be late which was carrying a weapons trafficker, who was scheduled to meet a broker, who was going to sell weapons to someone who might have committed a crime with them (or might not have), is reason enough to congratulate the traffic engineers on the light sequence. Malloy is a imbecile.
It’s a good time to remind some of my readers who weren’t with me from the beginning that I don’t believe in prisons. I believe in the Biblical ideas of restitution and retribution. If a man steals from you, he has to pay it back times two or three. If he can’t, he is your indentured servant for such period of time as the debt is paid. The notion of “debt to society” is obscene. If a man steals from you he has a debt to you, not to society.
As far as retribution is concerned, perpetrators of murder, rape and kidnapping are to be executed. And if a man has shown that he cannot be a part of society without perpetrating violence of upon others (e.g., repeated assault), he should similarly be executed.
Prisons are for societies who believe in rehabilitation. I do not. And even if I did, prisons do not effect rehabilitation. That is asking the impossible of incarceration. The only problem with my approach is that the so-called criminal justice system in America is broken and run by officers of the court who are themselves thugs, criminals and ne’er-do-wells.
As far as Mr. Dong is concerned, he doesn’t need to be either rehabilitated or incarcerated, and ownership of these weapons should not have been illegal. The unfortunate part about his incarceration is that in order to survive it, he will probably have to become criminalized himself. This incident will cause losers all around, with nothing good coming from any of it.
And Governor Malloy is an imbecile.
On October 20, 2014 at 8:33 am, dan said:
AMEN…..an eye for an eye…..turn the other cheek is for progressives and cowards in a ‘civilized society.,,,,which this world does NOT have….but is told the lie that it does by the ‘masters of deceit’….imho
On October 20, 2014 at 11:56 am, Samuel Adams said:
And 7pts down in the CT governors race poll released yesterday….
On November 3, 2014 at 4:56 am, Bill Daigle said:
In general, if I sign a rental agreement which states I won’t have firearms, then if I break that agreement I get what I get. I realize that going in, still I will most likely have a gun which NO ONE will know about unless the noise gives me away in a SHTF situation, had this guy relied more on discretion he would be getting a degree by now. One thing 20+ years of carrying a gun has taught me is that gray is a very beautiful and quiet color. As to the political aspects of this one case…there is, if our legislators would care to read it, a Bill of Rights that would answer all these questions. YMMV