Notes From HPS
BY Herschel Smith10 years, 1 month ago
“The law did prohibit Jews and other persecuted classes from owning guns, but this should not be an indictment of gun control in general,” Alexander Seitz-Wald wrote unbelievably in a Salon hit piece, as if that made it all OK then, because non-threats to the regime could still have them. And it wasn’t just guns forbidden to “persecuted classes,” as a JPFO analysis of the November 11, 1938 (the day after Kristallnacht) law reveals.
[ … ]
To those who would “whistle past the graveyard of history,” deny that brutal tyranny could ever happen here, and call talk of armed defense against it unsupportable and even treasonous, where in history is any civilization guaranteed stasis? Has not despotism and mass destruction plagued every civilization that preceded ours? Is it not, in fact, still commonplace throughout the globe? By what suspension of reality, by what denial of the observable and the probable, by what art, device or magic are we sheltered few immune from catastrophe?
Yea, I’ve discussed the silly notion too that gun control wasn’t part of the stock and trade of the Nazis since they allowed their supporters to have guns. The salient point is that gun control isn’t gun control if it forbids every one from having guns. Someone always has guns. The point of gun control is to make sure that only certain people have guns. You understand that, don’t you? By arguing like they do, the collectivists fall into our trap and stipulate to our definitions.
As for the final paragraph I’ve lifted, this is David at his best, waxing philosophical. This prose is just that good. If you don’t read anything else today, go over to David’s place and read this piece.
In other words, the heat and pressure that previously had to be contained by the plastic barrel and breech of a printed gun is now instead contained in a thick steel cartridge case. Moreover, although, as the article acknowledges, the cartridge cases require some painstaking machining, they can be used over and over. Crumling is not manufacturing ammunition for sale, as doing so would require a federal license, although he has said that he would be willing to obtain such a license if there is sufficient interest in the rounds. If he sold only the steel cases themselves, without loading them with a bullet, the propellant powder, and the primer, the license would be unnecessary.
I had wondered what they were going to do about the high chamber pressures for such a firearm (approaching 55,000 – 60,000 psi). Now you know. Kurt is doing a great job of watching this issue. I sense frustration with the ATF, like there is someone or something somewhere they don’t control.
Or in other words, the federal government stole the property of a peaceable and law abiding businessman.
On November 9, 2014 at 11:36 pm, Daniel Barger said:
Wow….BATFEces confiscates the gun this man INTENDED to buy, not bought, not used but just WANTED. And they are “investigating”….since no actual firearms transaction took place there is nothing for them to investigate that is relevant to their bureau….I have no doubt however that the purpose of their investigation is to find a reason to justify screwing Mr. Cargill legally, revoking his FFL and putting him out of business. If they bankrupt him in the process that will be an added happy bonus as far as they are concerned. The feds have ZERO need to be involved in this incident. The fact that they are is an indicator that they have an evil agenda.