Progressives Are Willing To Sacrifice Your Life For Their Gun Control
BY Herschel Smith
9 years, 11 months ago
Writing on Facebook, Jefferies said he believes many people will argue that the hostage situation proves that gun control–of which Australia has plenty–does not stop criminals. But Jefferies believes the hostage situation proves just the opposite.
Jefferies wrote:
I don’t know what the end result of this stand-off will be, but I do know this, he will only shoot that shotgun once before the police will be in there. This is a piss weak terrorist at best.
If this had happened in the USA the guy would have semi automatic weapons and hand guns that could easily kill many people in a short period of time. It seems to me that gun control in Australia is working better than ever.
And as for that one time, well, if it’s you I guess he’s sorry, but you’re not important enough for him to relinquish his collectivist views. To this Newsweek article, the comment thread is interesting.
You can’t take people’s guns away if guns are still in the hands of others. I wonder what would have happened if someone had a gun in the purse or on their person.
Chris Pelham · Mornington, Victoria, Australia
they would have been the first to die? Or increased the body count in the crossfire?
Better to sacrifice one or two schmucks than to allow the whole lot of them to be killed , or so goes the thinking in Australia.
|
|
On December 18, 2014 at 3:55 pm, robertsgunshop said:
Chris Pelham · Mornington, Victoria, Australia
they would have been the first to die? Or increased the body count in the crossfire?
The odds would be in your favor because one gunman can’t watch everyone at once. I’d rather die knowing I tried to fight back than to be slaughtered like a sheep.
On December 19, 2014 at 10:38 am, Ned Weatherby said:
This could get interesting. Some of us who are armed, will usher our families out the back door, if possible, and call the police ( who, as you know, have no legal duty to protect any citizen.)
However, I’d bet that most of us could actually hit the target.
Chris,Pelham, just wear a shirt that states you don’t want any armed citizen to interfere on your behalf, and leave your safety to police.
If anti self-defense folks were easier to identify, our decisions would be easier for us.
On December 19, 2014 at 11:14 pm, zeus234 said:
“but I do know this, he will only shoot that shotgun once before” And who shall my victim be?
I guess assuming they weren’t caught in a crossfire.