AstroTurf Harassment Campaign Against Gun Owners
BY Herschel Smith
7 years, 12 months ago
They evidently want the taxpayers to foot the bill for Democrat apparatchiks “to advocate or promote gun control” after Congress took funding away from their unmasked propaganda designed to render guns “dirty, deadly and banned.” They’ll “also seek ways to challenge state lawmakers who have invited millions of citizens to pack guns in public buildings and businesses,” go after “a crazy quilt of state and national gun laws … drawing upon public safety, antitrust and property laws,” and seek ways around the Protection in Lawful Commerce in Arms Act.
Read the rest here. Well, this points to a number of things we’ve discussed here. First of all, we gun owners have no right to complain if we’re not involved at the local and state level. Liberty, just like it’s infringement, begins at home.
But if the cases ever get to the federal level, remember that Donald Trump will fill some 100 court vacancies, all of them very important, and at least one Supreme Court vacancy (and hopefully several more), which for certain things are even more important.
You have to be involved not only at the state level, but remember to conduct your activism at the federal level. It beat George Soros once, and it can do it again. And who knows? Perhaps Soros will be in hell soon. Perhaps it’s time for group imprecatory prayers against the old wicked man.
Who would like to lead off?
|
|
On December 28, 2016 at 9:32 am, UNCLEELMO said:
Amen, Brother. Sing it!
Praise the Lord and Pass the Ammunition!
On December 28, 2016 at 4:51 pm, Billy Mullins said:
Lets hope he does a better job of filling those openings than W did. Some of W’s appointees have handed down some very bad decisions. I guarantee that when the Dhimmicrats are in power they damned well make sure their appointees are ideologically “sound”. Trump’s team needs to do the same. Trump needs to appoint people who are not only qualified but who can be trusted to make sound, constitution-based decisions.
On December 29, 2016 at 9:40 am, Fred said:
The fact remains that we don’t yet know what ‘ideologically sound’ is to a Trump presidency.