In The Wake Of The Airport Shooting, The Case For Gun Carry Is Clearer Than Ever
BY Herschel Smith7 years, 9 months ago
Last week’s shooting at the Fort Lauderdale airport hasn’t put a dent in Sen. Greg Steube’s plan to allow concealed weapons permit holders to carry their firearms in airports. In fact, it’s only strengthened his resolve to pass the legislation, which he says is desperately needed to prevent future mass shootings in the Sunshine State.
“The situation at the airport further puts a big spotlight on the fact that gun free zones and laws that prevent law abiding citizens to carry.. the only person that protects is the criminal,” Steube told Sunshine State News Wednesday.
Steube’s proposal, SB 140, would lift some “gun free” zones in Florida where carrying firearms is prohibited, even for concealed carry permit holders.
If passed, the bill would allow Florida’s 1.7 million CCW permit holders to openly carry their firearms. The more sweeping part of the measure, however, would eliminate gun-free zones in places like secondary schools, local centers and government meeting areas.
Airports are also included.
Since last week’s shooting which left five dead and six wounded, Steube’s phone has been ringing off the hook. On Tuesday, the day the bill was supposed to be heard in the Senate Judiciary Committee, his district office received 120 calls alone.
He doesn’t understand why there’s such a resistance to CCW permit holders carrying their firearms around since they have to undergo background checks. Statistically speaking, permit holders follow the letter of the law.
A 2015 report found CCW permit holders committed crimes at a much lower rate than police officers did. A Police Quarterly study from 2005 to 2007 saw an average of 103 crimes by police per 100,000 officers.
Well, all of that is true, but notice that the argument he uses to persuade others is based on data rather than fundamental and properly basic rights. Very well. Remember what we’ve discussed – incrementalism. A bill doesn’t have to be perfect to get my support. We can go for constitutional carry later. One step at a time.
As for the airport shooting, someone remarked to me that things like this make our argument harder. I disagree. It makes our argument crystal clear. As to how the shooter got a gun in the airport, he did so legally, just like a perpetrator can do it on virtually any street corner or grocery store in America.
Imagine this being on a street corner and someone asking, “just exactly how did this person come to have a gun to begin with?” This is a stupid question, of course. It’s likely he bought it. If not, he stole it. What does it matter? Criminals intent on crime don’t care how they prepare for perpetration of their crime.
The only defense against this is to allow others (law abiding men and women) to carry weapons, openly and concealed. Make your choice. Don’t dictate how a man carries his weapon. People who do that piss me off. Word. They should drop their pink panties and put on big boy shorts. Grow up and leave everyone alone instead of trying to be mommy.
How a man carries his weapon is analogous to what color he paints his car. It’s his business, not yours.
On January 12, 2017 at 1:36 pm, Duke Norfolk said:
“How a man carries his weapon is analogous to what color he paints his car. It’s his business, not yours.”
Hear, hear. The open vs. concealed debate is beyond tiresome. Talk about a horse beaten to death and beyond…