David Codrea:
“U.S. Virgin Islands Gov. Kenneth Mapp signed an emergency order allowing the seizure of private guns, ammunition, explosives and property the National Guard may need to respond to Hurricane Irma,” Michael Bastasch reported Tuesday at The Daily Caller. “The order allows the Adjutant General of the Virgin Islands to seize private property they believe necessary to protect the islands, subject to approval by the territory’s Justice Department.”
David updates the article with an attempt at damage control that actually makes matters worse, essentially saying that not only can they do this, they regularly do it as a matter of course and they have the right to do it. At least that’s the way I read it.
I’ll point out a few things. First of all, there is the British Virgin Islands and the U.S. Virgin islands. The two are not the same thing, and this is occurring in the U.S. Virgin Islands. Second, while the people there are technically considered U.S. citizens, they aren’t treated that way.
For example, the U.S. Code (48 U.S. Code 1561) outlines a bill of rights for their citizens that doesn’t include any hint of bearing arms. This seems to me to be ripe the litigation before the SCOTUS, but apparently that’s for another time.
Third, even though no one can effect change in the confiscation at the moment, this does go to show the first reflex of collectivists. And you do understand how they know who has firearms, don’t you?
Finally, in a somewhat related vein today I saw a discussion thread at reddit/r/firearms that needs to be addressed. When responding to a post that compared these confiscations to those post-Katrina, one commenter said this.
No, what happened in Katrina was very different. The order in Katrina was given by the local police superintendent, not the governor. As well, the overwhelming majority of those confiscated in New Orleans were abandoned in houses or forfeited upon being rescued when people were taken to refugee sites. By in (sic) large if a person wanted to stay in their home with their gun, they could.
This is simply a lie, and the commenter knows it. The comment sounds like it was written by a LEO or former LEO, but it’s wrong in the superlative degree. There were weapons confiscations done forcibly, i.e., without owner consent, and those weapons were either never gotten back or were in such bad shape (having been cared for poorly) that they were non-functional.
They were returned only because the NRA sponsored a lawsuit to force return of the weapons. Those confiscations were conducted by local police and military contractors (insert groups like DynCorp here), with supplemental manpower and backup provided by the Louisiana National Guard under the command of Russel Honore, who is proud of his gun confiscation efforts during Katrina.