Ralph Peters Does Gun Control In The Wake Of The Las Vegas Shooting
BY Herschel Smith
7 years, 2 months ago
Fox News strategic analyst Ralph Peters said “the Founding Fathers didn’t want every juiced-up psycho to have a machine gun collection” and argued that “an armed crowd” would have only made the situation worse after a mass shooting at a Las Vegas concert left at least 58 dead and more than 500 wounded.
“The idea that an armed crowd would’ve made a difference — if it made any difference, it would’ve been worse,” Peters told Stuart Varney on Fox Business. “And I am a gun owner. I will always be a gun owner.”
“But the Founding Fathers didn’t want every juiced-up psycho to have a machine gun collection,” he continued. “We need to look at what kind of weapons they had — clearly, this guy had military-grade weapons — and where he got them. Because automatic rifles are illegal for the average citizen to own.
How the hell do you know what the founding fathers wanted beyond what they wrote, drama queen? And I assume that you have a clinical definition for the phrase “juiced-up psycho?” Let’s hear it, doctor. Give me your clinical definition. We’re waiting. Oh, I see. You don’t have one. Okay, on to the next point.
As to this notion that the founding fathers didn’t want “civilians” to own “military grade” weapons, you expect us to believe that the patriot fighters during the war of independence, who had risked their lives, livelihoods, families and fortunes, and who shot cannon when they had powder and ball, and who used these weapons against the government, would not have wanted machine guns if they had access to them? You only think that because you’re an idiot.
I told my sons Joshua and Joseph about your commentary, Ralph, and we all agreed that we care more what our dogs had to say about gun control than we did what you have to say. Joseph asked Roxie, his Chow, a very sweet girl, and she looked at him like I look over the top of my glasses at somebody stupid.
Roxie thinks you’re full of crap, Ralph. So do I.
|
|
On October 3, 2017 at 4:55 am, DAN III said:
Peters will be the same, military type cheering on using fedgov military personnel to confiscate American’s private property….firearms. He is the perfect example as to why I have never had any use for comissioned officers above the pay grade of O-3.
The U.S. military will NOT be the friend of the citizenry come a confiscation attempt.
On October 3, 2017 at 7:19 am, Heywood said:
Strategic Analyst…aka unemployable blowhard.
On October 3, 2017 at 5:13 pm, Backwoods Engineer said:
The attack on our right to keep and bear arms is going to come hard this time. Maybe harder than after the Sandy Hook massacre. Maybe this whole operation was for the very purpose of taking our rights away.
But I’m not planning to disarm, and I’m sure you’re not either. We’re going to beat this back, I think, but it may be after some jackbooted thugs kill some people in the slave states like Noo Yawk. Bad times are coming for gun owners, no doubt.
On October 3, 2017 at 7:53 pm, Heywood said:
Hey…that dog looks guilty!
She looks like a good girl!
On October 3, 2017 at 8:43 pm, Fred said:
There’s a good dog. Extra handful of kibble for you dear.