Is Gun Violence Contagious?
BY Herschel Smith7 years ago
“It’s been known for some time that gun violence, like many other forms of crime and other social problems, can be clustered within certain neighborhoods,” says Charles Loeffler, the Jerry Lee Assistant Professor of Criminology in the University of Pennsylvania’s School of Arts & Sciences. “So when we observe that a particular part of the city has an elevated risk, how do we understand what that phenomenon actually is?”
Loeffler and Oxford statistician Seth Flaxman, who published their findings in the Journal of Quantitative Criminology, turned to data from Washington, D.C., firearm-related 9-1-1 calls and acoustical sensors around the city that listen for and record the latitude and longitude of every shot fired.
Starting from the baseline that gun violence doesn’t occur randomly, the researchers ran the numbers for two hypotheses. First, they asked whether such behavior could be an epidemic, something that spreads quickly and diffuses into the surrounding environment. One incident begets the next, such as a victim retaliating against a former perpetrator.
“The alternative hypothesis,” Loeffler says, “is that you have clustering of gun violence in certain neighborhoods at certain times, but it may not actually be spreading in any real sense.” The researchers call this an endemic pattern.
As an example, consider an encounter in a bar: Two individuals bump into each other. One takes offense at being accidentally shoved and pulls out or quickly gains access to a gun. The same scenario might happen during a drug deal, where one party feels slighted by another. In either case, the resulting action is not retaliation, but rather an aggressive response to a commonly reoccurring stimulus.
For Washington, D.C., the data were compelling.
“We found that a substantial fraction of the gun violence was better characterized as this endemic, non-random clustering rather than as an epidemic, contagious, diffusing process,” he says.
But then you knew that already, didn’t you. That is, if you have a lick of common sense, which doesn’t seem to be so common these day.
There is L.A., Chicago, New York, St. Louis, Houston, Atlanta, New Orleans, Washington D.C. and Baltimore, and then there’s everywhere else.
On November 6, 2017 at 5:32 am, DAN III said:
For me there exists no such thing as “gun violence”. That term, conjured up by the Left, the communists, has been installed to attack an inanimate object rather than place blame on human being commiting the crime. The leftist term “gun violence” works for the communist agenda in this country.
Here are a few terms used to further the agenda of Amerikan communists:
1. Rifle/Carbine/Pistol now = “Assault Weapon”
2. Homesexual persuasion = “Gay” (Are they happy ?)
3. Criminal Activity Using ANY inanimate weapon (Motor Vehicle, Forceps, Pressure Cooker) = “Gun Violence”.
Here I thought in the autumn of my years I could enjoy the fruits of my decades of labor. Instead I find myself defending my beliefs from government thugs and communist citizens.
Remember….words have MEANING. To the .gov thugs like Casey-PA, Feinstein-CA, Durbin-IL and a host of Amerikan leftists in and outside of fedgov/stategov/localgov I challenge them and their badged thug shills:
“Come and Take It” !
The time is coming. Verify your zero. Make peace with your family and your God.
On November 6, 2017 at 6:29 am, Frank Clarke said:
Within America’s nearly 4 million square miles, virtually all “gun violence” occurs within the less than 400 square miles of about two dozen “inner cities”, and almost all of it is drug-fueled gang disputes. By an odd coincidence, those 400 square miles are the exclusive province of long-established liberal Democratic mayors and city councils. Without the violence emanating from those places, America’s violent crime statistics rank with the safest places on Earth. Put another way, if you steer clear of such places you ARE living in the safest place on Earth. What an excellent reason for avoiding such places…
On November 6, 2017 at 7:41 am, Fred said:
Apparently the researchers don’t have children or they would have gotten the ‘good school district vs. bad school district’ secret decoder ring rendering the need for these studies moot.