U.S. Special Forces Wants Russian Machine Guns
BY Herschel Smith6 years, 11 months ago
Why would U.S. special forces want to manufacture Russian machine guns?
Just watch any video of a conflict such as Iraq and Syria, and the answer becomes clear. Many of the combatants are using Russian or Soviet weapons, or local copies thereof, from rifles to rocket launchers to heavy machine guns mounted on pickups. Which means that when U.S. special forces provide some of these groups with weapons, they have to scrounge through the global arms market to buy Russian hardware as well as spare parts.
So U.S. Special Forces Command, which oversees America’s various commando units, has an idea: instead of buying Russian weapons, why not build their own? That’s why USSOCOM is asking U.S. companies to come up with a plan to manufacture Russian and other foreign weapons.
The goal is to “develop an innovative domestic capability to produce fully functioning facsimiles of foreign-made weapons that are equal to or better than what is currently being produced internationally,” according to the USSOCOM Small Business Innovation Research proposal.
More specifically, USSOCOM wants American companies to explore whether it is feasible to “reverse engineer or reengineer and domestically produce the following foreign-like weapons: 7.62×54R belt fed light machine gun that resembles a PKM (Pulemyot Kalashnikova Modernizirovany), and a 12.7×108mm heavy machine gun that resembles a Russian-designed NSV (Nikitin, Sokolov, Volkov).”
Applicants for the research project must produce “five fully functional prototypes, to include firing of live ammunition, of a foreign-like weapon that resembles the form, fit, and function of a Russian-designed NSV 12.7×108mm heavy machine gun.”
However, USSOCOM won’t make the process easy by providing assistance such as technical drawings. Interested companies will have to make their own drawings of foreign weapons, acquire the appropriate parts and raw materials, and create a manufacturing capability.
Companies will also have to “address the manufacture of spare parts to support fielded weapons.” In addition, they must be prepared to start up and shut down production as needed, as well as provide varying quantities of weapons.
USSOCOM also emphasizes that foreign weapons must be strictly made in America. Manufacturers “will employ only domestic labor, acquire domestically produced material and parts, and ensure weapon manufacture and assembly in domestic facilities.”
Though USSOCOM is starting with a pair of Russian machine guns, the research proposal speaks of foreign-made weapons in general. “Developing a domestic production capability for foreign-like weapons addresses these issues while being cost effective as well as strengthens the nation’s military-industrial complex, ensures a reliable and secure supply chain, and reduces acquisition lead times.”
Of course, one unstated solution to this problem is for the problem not to exist at all, which would mean minding our own damn business and not arming everyone on earth with weapons. America has become Imperialists, meddlers, bilkers of armaments, precious metals, money, children and oil. Basically, anything worth something on the open market interests Washington, most of all the deep state (including Senators, the FBI and the CIA).
The second thing that should be pointed out is that the world would prefer American weapons if we made them better. The Stoner system of arms (in particular today that means mostly the AR-15) is ubiquitous, but for machine guns, both light and heavy, or basically anything that needs to operate open bolt rather than closed bolt for heat dissipation, the rest of the world leads the way, including with the M249 SAW (not so for the M2, which as best as I know, is still the best heavy machine gun in the world).
Without the NFA and gun control act, civilians would be able to manufacture and innovate in order to field the very best armaments on the planet. We have the best engineers, the best machinists, the best gunsmiths and the best mechanics on the planet, so there isn’t any reason we can’t field the best armaments on the planet.
But machines are vetted on the open civilian market, not within the closed circles of the military industrial apparatus. We will always lag behind, as we should, because the rulers want to rule, and they fear the American public.
Too bad. Suck it up, American military. You get machines built by the lowest cost bidder, and innovation isn’t in the game plan. The government is out of money, and civilians have been excluded from the process. We are doing our own thing.
On December 5, 2017 at 8:53 am, Ned said:
So USSOCOM is asking U.S. companies to come up with a plan to manufacture Russian and other foreign weapons.
Anyone with any sense will tell these fickle asshats to piss off. How many times has there been scrapped military projects after numerous companies busted ass to build guns under the project terms.
Like someone’s really gonna go to the trouble and expense to design and build prototypes and then discover that, as usual, at the eleventh hour that the project has, in typical fashion, been abandoned.
On December 5, 2017 at 8:54 am, Frank Clarke said:
True all, but along with all the things we’re best at, you left out the most important: we invent. We are the wacko outside-the-box tinkerers that imagine the next best thing — and then build it. That is the thing that drives our economy even when the morons in DC are doing their level best to throw wooden shoes into the gearbox.
http://tinyurl.com/TipgPt2
On December 5, 2017 at 10:08 am, Bill Buppert said:
Don’t forget that the US turned the MG34/42 into the M60 under government guidance.
On December 7, 2017 at 5:11 pm, ExpatNJ said:
US Military will need compatible arms/calibers so they can team-up with Russian troops (or comparable UN forces) when the latter invade the United States to impose real tyranny.
Or, is this more simply a situation of:
– money: “If ya got it, spend it” ?
– boys with toys: “be the first on your block with a PKM/NSV” ?