Comments

1. On April 18, 2018 at 12:52 pm, Georgiaboy61 said:

   @ Herschel

   ‘Muslim Street Prayers in France” and your story of several days ago, “Machete Attack Every 90 Minutes In ‘Gun Free’ Britain,” are connected, quite closely in fact.

   The Muslim conquest of Europe, which is happening in real time right before our eyes, would not proceed as smoothly as its planners would like if ordinary Europeans – whether in France or anyplace else – retained the right to keep/bear arms. Moreover, the consolidation phase of the conquest, now underway in Islamic London, works that much better against a population of native Britons who have been disarmed and cowed into an intimidated silence by their own authorities.

   The globalists at the European Union and their allies – including a significant number of high-level political leaders such as Chancellor Merkel of Germany, President Macron of France, Prime Minister May of Britain, and EU President Jean-Claude Juncker – are using the soldiers of Allah as their shock troops – the SS & Gestapo – of their movement, which seeks to create a European super-state or caliphate.

   Their method is the Hegelian dialectic, i.e., socially-engineer a problem, provoke a reaction to the crisis, and then step in with the “solution” which gives them – the western oligarchs and ruling classes – what they wanted in the first place, namely more power, more wealth and more-centralized control.

   By forcing the diaspora of the third-world, especially large numbers of Muslims, into old Europe – something her people have never wanted – the oligarchs in the shadows mean to produce social unrest, chaos, violence and ultimately civil conflict. When conditions get bad-enough, they will suddenly appear on the scene with a “solution” in hand which gives Europeans back a measure of their security and safety, in return of course, for surrendering more of the few rights and liberties they now retain.

   It is interesting to speculate upon how many high-level Europeans and members of the ruling class – have already converted to Islam. Recent events would seem to suggest a substantial number of either converts or dhimmis – non-Muslims who live under Islamic rule and accept their status as inferiors who must pay the jizya tax, and who live only at the sufferance of their Muslim masters.

   Over the last several years, the EU has been attempting to force the Swiss – that nation of riflemen – to disarm, just as their statist counterparts in the United States have been attempting to force ordinary Americans to surrender their weapons and right to keep/bear arms.

   The ideology of this supranational/globalist movement is a curious blend of Cultural Marxism, which is the dominant ideology of the western ruling elites – and Islam. Whatever the doctrinal differences between them, for the moment, all the Cultural Marxists and Muslims care about is their shared goal of the destruction of western civilization.

   The Islamo-Marxist alliance was foreseen by infamous international terrorist and assassin-for-hire, Carlos the Jackal, a.k.a. Ilich Ramírez Sánchez, who – after being caught and incarcerated in a French prison – converted to Islam and penned the book “Revolutionary Islam” (L’islam révolutionnaire) in which he stated, “…only a coalition of Islamic and Marxist revolutionaries can bring down America,” and went on to praise Osama Bin Laden and then-U.S. President Barack Hussein Obama.

   So impressed was Ramirez with his fellow Muslim Obama, that he wrote a personal letter to him, praising his efforts to close Guantanamo Bay Prison and closing with the traditional salutation between Muslims of “Allah Akbar!”

2. On April 18, 2018 at 1:09 pm, Herschel Smith said:

   Anyone who successfully uses the phrase “Hegelian dialectic” in a comment gets an A+ for the day.

   But it only lasts for one day. Every day is a fresh chance for display of intelligence.

3. On April 18, 2018 at 1:58 pm, Gryphon said:

   Notice the Po-Lice protecting the Invading Army. Remember this, in the End, EVERYONE in the ‘government’ is a Traitor to the Republic.

   Coming to a City near You, Soon.

   (Darn. That’s a Target-Rich environment…)

4. On April 18, 2018 at 2:31 pm, JoeFour said:

   Here’s what Joseph Story had to say about the First Amendment:

   “The real object of the First Amendment was not to countenance, much less advance Mohammedanism, or Judaism or infidelity, by prostrating Christianity; but … to prevent any national ecclesiastical establishment which should give to a hierarchy the exclusive patronage of the national government.”

   My layman’s translation of Justice Story’s early 19th century language: the First Amendment was intended to protect the various American Christian denominations from the establishment of a national, Christian church by the federal government … it has nothing to do with protecting or promoting other (non-Christian) religions especially when such protections and promotion would be detrimental to American Christianity.

   Unfortunately, like so many other things in this upside-down, modern world, that traditional American position has been turned on its head … and made into the opposite of its original intention.

5. On April 18, 2018 at 3:56 pm, Georgiaboy61 said:

   Re: “Anyone who successfully uses the phrase “Hegelian dialectic” in a comment gets an A+ for the day.”

   Well, thanks – as the Texans say, I’d better get a bigger hat!

   Lest I be mistaken for a sophomore-year philosophy 101 student, I don’t usually use such highbrow language, but since the Cultural Marxists take this stuff seriously, perhaps we ought to have at least a passing acquaintance with their methods and ideology.

   Re: “The real object of the First Amendment was not to countenance, much less advance Mohammedanism, or Judaism or infidelity, by prostrating Christianity; but … to prevent any national ecclesiastical establishment which should give to a hierarchy the exclusive patronage of the national government.”

   Although it is not well-known today – the cultural Marxist educational establishment has purged the knowledge from modern history textbooks – a number of the Founding Fathers seriously-debated whether or not to write into the U.S. Constitution and explicit ban upon the practice of Islam, what they would have called Mohammedanism. Among these were John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, and John Quincy Adams, respectively the second, third and sixth presidents of the United States.

   Thomas Jefferson – who had dealt with the Barbary Pirates during the First Barbary War with Tripoli (1801-1805) – owned a Koran which he had studied in-depth with the intent of learning more about his adversary. Upon taking office in 1801, Jefferson refused to submit to the ransom demands of the Sultan, and instead sent the U.S. Navy and Marine Corps to Tripoli with orders to deal with the corsairs – an action now memorialized in the Marine Corps Hymn.

   John Quincy Adams took accurate measure of Islam when he stated, “…he (Muhammad) declared undistinguishing and exterminating war, as a part of his religion, against all the rest of mankind…The precept of the Koran is, perpetual war against all who deny, that Mahomet is the prophet of God.”

   Ultimately, the Founders did not act upon the idea of an explicit amendment or other language to the constitution prohibiting the practice of Islam, probably because they could not foresee a day when America would be so foolish as to adopt the ways of the oldest enemy of Christendom and European civilization.

   Nor were the views of the Founders controversial. As recently as a century ago, such contemporary figures as President Theodore Roosevelt and future British Prime Minister and statesman Winston Churchill, warned of the dangers posed by Islam.

   As a young cavalryman of the 21st Lancers, Winston Churchill had served in the Sudan as an officer in the army of Field Marshall Herbert Kitchener, where he participated in the pivotal Battle of Omdurman in September, 1898. Churchill later wrote of his experiences in the book, “The River War: An Historical Account of the Reconquest of the Soudan,” which was published in 1899. Of the Mohammedans, he wrote at length:

   “How dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries! Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy. The effects are apparent in many countries. Improvident habits, slovenly systems of agriculture, sluggish methods of commerce, and insecurity of property exist wherever the followers of the Prophet rule or live. A degraded sensualism deprives this life of its grace and refinement; the next of its dignity and sanctity.”

   “The fact that in Mohammedan law every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property, either as a child, a wife, or a concubine, must delay the final extinction of slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among men. Individual Moslems may show splendid qualities – but the influence of the religion paralyses the social development of those who follow it. No stronger retrograde force exists in the world. Far from being moribund, Mohammedanism is a militant and proselytizing faith. It has already spread throughout Central Africa, raising fearless warriors at every step; and were it not that Christianity is sheltered in the strong arms of science, the science against which it had vainly struggled, the civilisation of modern Europe might fall, as fell the civilisation of ancient Rome.”

   Most contemporary people, if they know of Churchill at all, know of his role in leading wartime Great Britain as she stood alone against Nazi Germany. Even the Prime Minister’s own son, Winston Churchill (1940-2010), had not know of his father’s prescience,

   “Churchill is, of course, well-known for his gift of prescience and, specifically, for being the first to warn of the menace of Hitler and Nazism as early as 1932, and of the Soviet threat in his famous Iron Curtain speech in 1946 in Fulton, Mo. But how many know that he also warned the world of the dangers of Islamic fundamentalism? I certainly did not!”

   Up has indeed become down, however, because today, an ordinary Briton can be arrested and jailed for quoting from “The River War,” as British opposition politician Paul Weston recently found out when he read the passage above from the 1899 book in public, and was promptly arrested on “hate crimes” charges by the London police.

6. On April 18, 2018 at 6:41 pm, Pat Hines said:

   Where’s a belt fed when you need it?

7. On April 18, 2018 at 9:50 pm, Ned said:

   None of those muzzies look like they actually produce anything of value. I wonder how much French welfare pays them?

   Incidentally, I know of a driver for Fed Ex who was fired for complaining about a Moslem praying in a break room. This insidious crap is being imported here.

   For a simple exercise in understanding the Hegelian Dialectic, take a look at the disarmament edicts resulting from school shootings. This information is also helpful in determining friends and enemies.

8. On April 19, 2018 at 11:47 am, Gryphon said:

   Something to Consider – All of the politicians (here and in europe) have Seldom, if Ever, passed ‘laws’ that give the Invaders (whether cockroach or musloid) any ‘preferential treatment – Yet OBVIOUSLY, these ‘leaders’ have Instructed their Enforcers (Po-Lice and Military) to Ignore the Crimes of the Invaders, and Brutally Suppress ANY dissent or complaint by the Citizens about the Invaders.

   When a sufficient Number of People ‘wake up’ to this fact, it wil have to turn Ugly, and not just against the Invaders.

9. On April 19, 2018 at 2:22 pm, Alex Lund said:

   To Gryphon:
   As a native German I can tell you one thing (but I think thats the same as in the US):
   In Germany there is something called Weisungsbefugnis. If the secretary of justice (who is the supreme commander of all judges, courts) picks up his phone and calls a judge and tells him to release a criminal then the judge has to obey. And the judge may not ask for a written command. A telephonecall is enough.
   Of course it is not used that open. But if a judge sees a collegue promoted before his time and after releasing a criminal of a certain Group (muslim) then the message spreads.
   So of course you find no hard evidence of this but whistleblowers confirm it.
   One whistleblower who worked in the unemployment Office told some stories what behaviour was expected of them. She was fired.

10. On April 19, 2018 at 10:19 pm, Georgiaboy61 said:

    @ Ned

    Re: “None of those muzzies look like they actually produce anything of value. I wonder how much French welfare pays them?”

    Probably plenty – and they aren’t alone. Many western/northern European nations have enacted laws which have made it possible for “refugees” – i.e., Muslims seeking to come to Europe – to apply for comprehensive welfare benefits and state assistance before even setting foot upon European soil. Yes, that’s right – a “downtrodden” refugee may apply for cradle-to-grave welfare in Sweden or Britain before the plane has even landed or the ship has even docked.

    As for the Muslims, their imams back in the Middle East have already told the shahids – the true believers of Islam – that going on the dole in places like England, France, Germany and Sweden – is a form of jihad, and therefore approved under sharia law. The young fighters, the mujahedeen, cannot get there fast-enough. Especially the ones with a taste for blondes!

    I’m not joking; Mohammed – Islam’s prophet, was known to have a taste for the fair-haired and skinned women of Byzantium, what the Muslims of that time called women from Europe and modern-day Russia. He asked his followers, “Do you want the women of Banu al-Asfar?” In Arabic, “Banu al-Asfar” means “children of the yellow,” a reference to the blond hair and fair skin of many Europeans. Even today, European women are highly sought-after in the Muslims world in the illicit underworld trade in sexual slaves. As it turns out, the 2008 film “Taken,” was more factual than many people realized.

    Re:”Incidentally, I know of a driver for Fed Ex who was fired for complaining about a Moslem praying in a break room. This insidious crap is being imported here.”

    The powers-that-be want you to think this is an isolated incident. They don’t want you to work backwards to the fundamentals and first principles here, namely that those in charge are facilitating this massive Islamic invasion of the West.

    Enoch Powell, it seems, was remarkably prescient and wise in his “Rivers of Blood” speech fifty years ago.

    Re: “For a simple exercise in understanding the Hegelian Dialectic, take a look at the disarmament edicts resulting from school shootings. This information is also helpful in determining friends and enemies.”

    Yes, precisely. The Cultural Marxists and powers-that-be in this country – the USA – are employing precisely the same methods. Given how-badly the ruling elites want ordinary Americans disarmed, it is a near-certainty that at least some of the “mass shootings” we have seen over the last decade – in schools and other locales – have been false-flag operations, wholly or at least in part. By which is meant that the apparent factual narrative represents a falsehood or apparent falsehood.

    The Turks were caught red-handed, a couple of years aqo, committing a false-flag act of terrorism in gassing innocent Syrians to death and then attempting to blame the act on the government of President Assad. Independent investigators confronted officers of the Turkish intelligence service, who openly confessed to the attack with a shrug of the shoulders, saying in effect, “Sometimes these attacks work, sometimes not.”

    If the powers-that-be are willing use chemical weapons on innocent civilians in Syria to realize their aims there, how hard do you think it would be for them to kill innocent children here in the U.S. to attain their goals here?

    @Gryphon

    Re: “In Germany there is something called Weisungsbefugnis. If the secretary of justice (who is the supreme commander of all judges, courts) picks up his phone and calls a judge and tells him to release a criminal then the judge has to obey.”

    The fix is in all over the Western World. In 2016, A 5-year-old girl was sexually assaulted by two boys at an apartment complex in Twin Falls, Idaho — while a third boy filmed the attack — and some local residents are charging the police and city officials with covering up the fact that the boys are from Muslim immigrant families from Sudan and Iraq.

    Twin Falls County Prosecutor Grant Loebs lied outright when he said, “There were no Syrians involved, there was no knife involved, there was no gang-rape.” A judge late took the extremely unusual step of slapping a gag order on the family of the victim, which prohibits them from speaking to the media, telling them that they would be charged with contempt of court if they violated the ruling. The family, unhappy with how the case has been handled, have effectively been silenced by the authorities.

    You may know of the Rotherham, England grooming gangs incidents going back more than a decade, in which Muslims kidnapped, addicted to narcotics and then forced into sexual slavery young girls and women. Others were forced into sexual slavery or gang-raped. as if this outrage wasn’t enough, the authorities there compounded the crime by attempting to cover it up.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Leave a comment