The Fudd’s Turn In The Barrel
BY Herschel Smith
6 years, 7 months ago
Chris Murphy’s “baby steps” advocacy and Nancy Pelosi’s “slippery slope” enthusiasm prove the original goal of incremental to total disarmament is still being pursued.
As for shotguns, why is it no one is now accusing the Fudds or Dick’s Sporting Goods of having blood on their hands? They couldn’t throw semi-auto owners under the bus fast enough. Now, just as a matter of logical consistency, it ought to be their turn in the barrel.
[ … ]
In addition to repeating calls for all the usual prior restraints, don’t be surprised to see a new “lock up your safety” push, under the ignorant presumption that one “solution” fits all. They stand a good chance of getting away with it, too, because relatively few people have heard of or remember the Merced pitchfork murders.
Sadly, just today around these parts, a man committed murder of family members with a vehicle. Vehicles, pitchforks, guns, hammers, whatever. It’s the person, not the implement.
So Fudds, tell me why we shouldn’t ban wheel guns and scatter guns too? I see no real need for upland fowl hunting.
How does it feel?
On May 21, 2018 at 7:38 am, Gryphon said:
It would seem that a Mass Murder with a Shotgun and a Revolver would make an “Ideal Argument” for the bolsheviks to call for Bans on the Fudd’s Weapons of choice… I think that if they go down that Path, at this Time, While Still not having made a dent in the numbers of Second-Amendment-Compliant Guns (military Arms) the result would be more People (Fudds included) see their True goal, the Banning of ALL Private Arms.
My Impression of this Incident is that it adds little to the bolshevik’s Propaganda Campaign other than a Shooting occurred in a School.
On May 21, 2018 at 12:24 pm, DAN III said:
ALCON,
Seems to me a speedy trial and conviction of the murderers followed by an even quicker execution within 30 days of “Guilty !”, would go far to deter violent crime.
On May 21, 2018 at 4:01 pm, Mack said:
I’ve said before that if the state insists on ‘Red Flagging’ a person, take everything that could become a murderous weapon, including all motor vehicles.
On May 21, 2018 at 4:38 pm, NOG said:
Might just be happening. That writer over at Esquire wants all guns rounded up. Then said all semi, all handguns, all “high powered rifles”. All big mags. Only one home defense shotgun per house for protection with “heavy restrictions” and only low velocity rifles for hunting- also “heavy restrictions”.
On May 21, 2018 at 4:50 pm, Henry said:
Dear Fudds: “And if you protest … international anti-gun activist Rebecca Peters has an answer for you, as expressed during her recent debate with Wayne LaPierre: “Get another hobby.”
https://www.nraila.org/articles/20050405/s-397-call-to-arms-1
On May 21, 2018 at 4:53 pm, Herschel Smith said:
@Henry,
Good. And this from me too:
Dear Fudds,
“Welcome to the party. We’re glad you could make it, You’re late – we noticed you waited until your own Ox got gored. We didn’t wait that long. We defended bump stock owners when we didn’t even have one. Because we understand what’s at stake. Maybe now you do too.”
On May 22, 2018 at 5:15 pm, Georgiaboy61 said:
@ Herschel
Re: “Dear Fudds,
“Welcome to the party. We’re glad you could make it, You’re late – we noticed you waited until your own Ox got gored. We didn’t wait that long. We defended bump stock owners when we didn’t even have one. Because we understand what’s at stake. Maybe now you do too.”
Americans may scoff that we wouldn’t be so foolish as to allow British-type firearms confiscations – and maybe that’s true – but make no mistake, that’s the powers-that-be have in store for us the same treatment. And after they confiscate the guns, they go after the next-power echelon of weapons next – knives, martial arts gear, etc.
London’s new multicultural Mayor, Muslim Sadiq Khan, has already proposed making certain kinds of knives and edged weapons illegal – except, of course, in the hands of his coreligionists.
There are already draconian laws on the books in the U.K. making defense of self, loved ones and property a crime – even inside one’s house! The police will take care of that for you, and so on and you know the rest of that tune.
In other developments, members of the London police force are considering breaking with long-standing British tradition and arming the Bobbies. Which begs the question: For whose protection – of native Britons, or those are attempting to subjugate them?
On May 22, 2018 at 5:17 pm, Georgiaboy61 said:
Re: Blasted typos; here’s the correct version of the sentence…
“that’s what the powers-that-be have in store for us – the same treatment. And after they confiscate the guns, they’ll go after the next-lower echelon of weapons next – knives, martial arts gear, etc.”