The Highest Goal Of The U.S. Military Now Is Diversity, Multi-Culturalism And Political Correctness
BY Herschel Smith
6 years, 2 months ago
Matt Bracken on diversity being out strength, multi-culturalism, political correctness and social media.
On September 11, 2018 at 12:11 am, Georgiaboy61 said:
Theodore Dalrymple, a.k.a. the pen-name of British psychiatrist and author Anthony Daniels, had this to say about political-correctness:
“Political correctness is communist propaganda writ small. In my study of communist societies, I came to the conclusion that the purpose of communist propaganda was not to persuade or convince, nor to inform, but to humiliate; and therefore, the less it corresponded to reality the better. When people are forced to remain silent when they are being told the most obvious lies, or even worse when they are forced to repeat the lies themselves, they lose once and for all their sense of probity. To assent to obvious lies is to co-operate with evil, and in some small way to become evil oneself. One’s standing to resist anything is thus eroded, and even destroyed. A society of emasculated liars is easy to control. I think if you examine political correctness, it has the same effect and is intended to.”
On September 11, 2018 at 8:24 am, SGT.BAG said:
The US Armed Services is now a breeding ground for wet nurses not warriors.
On September 11, 2018 at 9:07 am, Ned said:
Someone please supply an example of when putting (forcing) two different cultures and people together somehow makes them stronger.
Clearly, the pentagon is succumbing to deception. Blacks who increasing hate America mixed in with tribal Latinos and tribal trans Asian alliance members tossed together with fake men and fake women does not a cohesive fighting force make.
It’s not all “we are green” or “we are blue” anymore. This will not end well.
On September 11, 2018 at 12:02 pm, John Matterhorn said:
I saw this as well. Matt Bracken is a modern-day Nostradamus. I take everything he says seriously.
On September 12, 2018 at 3:00 pm, JoeFour said:
I knew there was a Federalist paper that spoke against the current, politically correct mantra that “diversity is our strength” but I couldn’t remember which one…lo and behold, I just found it (providentially?) in a comment posted at The Unz Review by a poster going by the handle John Gruskos:
“The founding fathers did explicitly state that the US was the homeland of the people Crevecouer referred to as “this new man, the American”.
“Here is what our first Chief Justice John Jay had to say in Federalist #2, which served as the thesis statement of the entire Federalist Papers written by Jay, Madison and Hamilton:
“Providence has been pleased to give this one connected country to one united people–a people descended from the same ancestors, speaking the same language, professing the same religion, attached to the same principles of government, very similar in their manners and customs, and who, by their joint counsels, arms, and efforts, fighting side by side throughout a long and bloody war, have nobly established general liberty and independence.
“This country and this people seem to have been made for each other, and it appears as if it was the design of Providence, that an inheritance so proper and convenient for a band of brethren, united to each other by the strongest ties, should never be split into a number of unsocial, jealous, and alien sovereignties.
“The only reason why Jay thinks the territory of the United States “should never be split” was because it was inhabited by one ethnic group, “this new man, the American”, descended from the same (North-West European) ancestors, speaking the same (English) language, professing the same (low-church Protestant) religion, attached to the same (Whig) principles of government, very similar in their manners and customs (because of their very similar frontier-settler experiences).”
On September 12, 2018 at 3:03 pm, JoeFour said:
…and here is the link to the article from The Unz Review…John Gruskos’ comment is no. 36…the whole article is worth a read!
http://www.unz.com/article/unless-the-gop-learns-to-handle-anti-white-race-baiting-attacks-its-done-and-so-is-the-historic-american-nation/
On September 12, 2018 at 3:16 pm, JoeFour said:
…and here Tucker Carlson of Fox News asks, “Exactly how is diversity our strength?”…worth watching:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1OOl50sjwwY
On September 14, 2018 at 4:47 am, DAN III said:
ALCON,
This sudden awakening to the fact that DoD and it’s branches have been pushing the death knell of diversity is a day late and a dollar short. DA has been hanging diversity posters in Army facilities for YEARS ! Since the usurpation of soetoro-obama ALL federal entities have embraced diversity….all minorities and females good; white, Christian males bad.
How about this diversity, implemented by soetoro-obama…..females in combat arms. Infantry, armor, artillery. Hell, even the Veterans Administration is on board with diversity. VA has publicly stated they must and will hire more females and colored folks because, well….the armed forces have multitudes of females, negroes and other “colored” troops in their ranks. We, the VA, must reflect the social justice programs of DoD by implementing diversity (the Left’s term for discrimination) to support the social justice enlistments/commissionings with social justice hires of our own. Example, my local VA has 13 primary care people assigned. Only three are men. The rest are females. And if the female’s ethnicity is that of a downtrodden minority, that is even better.
ERWACHE.
On September 14, 2018 at 4:59 am, DAN III said:
SGT BAG @ 0824,
The social justice efforts go back to 1976 when the service academies implemented social justice allowing females into the academies. West Point ceased being a manufacture of combat arms leadership. It became and remains a diversity academy to implement social just. Not win wars.
Having a service academy degree means nothing to me. All it means is the American taxpayer got and continues to get, ripped off.