Trump’s Bump Stock Ban
BY Herschel Smith
6 years, 1 month ago
These are non-negotiable terms of surrender, dictated by a “pro-gun” president, a “pro-gun” attorney general, and enabled by our “gun rights leaders.” Obey or be destroyed. Or as men standing on a green were reportedly ordered: “Throw down your arms, ye villains, ye Rebels, Disperse!”
If Trump and Sessions can get away with this naked, weasel-worded usurpation, guess what the Democrats will be able to pull, especially if enough feckless Republicans take the fire out of core supporter’s bellies and majorities flip.
Yea, I recall initially supporting someone else for President (before it came down to just two). What a shame we had the choice of bad and worse
On October 17, 2018 at 10:09 am, BRVTVS said:
Michelle Malkin also voiced serious objections to Trump early in his campaign. The problems with Cruz were that he is part of that republican establishment that always seems to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory, so he isn’t trusted by the base that’s been tricked by the GOP a few too many times and that it’d be hypocritical to object to Obama for probably being born outside the USA when we know Cruz wasn’t born here. http://constitution.org/abus/Is_Ted_Cruz_eligible_to_be_president.html
On October 17, 2018 at 11:36 am, Nutty Old Geezer said:
Cruz’s wife works for Goldman Sachs. Nuff said about where he will stand when the time comes. He is so swampy he needs chest waders in the Sahara Desert.
On October 17, 2018 at 2:44 pm, Gryphon said:
It will be just another act of Non-Compliance, just more amorphous than the State-level ‘assault weapons bans’ already being Ignored. In this case, since there is no real data on how many of these (pieces of junk, imo) are Out there, never mind how easy it is to Make one.
Eventually, (((they))) Must declare some kind of National Registration/Ban, because it is already Obvious that the ‘incremental steps’ approach has been rather ineffective in even Reducing the rate of Increase of the number of Arms in private hands. It would not Surprise Me one bit if Trump isn’t going to be the Tool used by the One Party (the party of money) to finally get the (un)Civil War they desperately seem to Want, kicked off.
On October 17, 2018 at 9:19 pm, Herschel Smith said:
@Geezer,
Enjoy the decline. Maybe we should take bets on what Trump will ban next. Or better yet, how a democratic administration will use this to ban everything.
On October 18, 2018 at 7:49 am, Fred said:
In email today:
“The Wall Street Journal has been writing stories about various regulatory proposals and is preparing a story about a rule pending at the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms at the U.S. Justice Department.
We are working with a national public research firm to help us collect information using an online survey format that should take you less than 5 minutes to complete.
Your identity, including your name and email address, will be kept confidential unless you indicate otherwise. Your answers will only be used in potential news stories when combined with other participants. At the end of the questionnaire, you will be asked if you are willing to be contacted by a reporter for The Wall Street Journal to discuss your answers further or use your name with a story.
To help us, click here [https://grimaldisurveys.cmail20.com/t/d-l-nqlha-jlidthdyud-t/], which will take you to the survey, being conducted for The Wall Street Journal by Mercury Analytics, a national public opinion research firm. Alternatively, you can go to this web address,
http://www.masurveys.com/wsj_2763?ID=7242155329
Thank you very much.
James V. Grimaldi
Senior Writer
THE WALL STREET JOURNAL
O: +1 202 862-6665
E: james.grimaldi@wsj.com“
On October 18, 2018 at 9:00 am, Ned said:
People even applauded Lindsay Graham for 5 minutes during the Kavanaugh hearings. Then he picked up his other pro-DACA-let-them-all-in hat and reminded the hoi polloi that he’s a statist intent on destroying the culture with mass immigration.
Don’t trust these people.