Appeal Filed After Judge Rules For Bump Stock Ban
BY Herschel Smith
5 years, 9 months ago
“Codrea also asserts that the bump stock rule violates the Takings Clause because it fails to provide compensation to current bump stock owners who must destroy or abandon their property. Regardless of the merits of Codrea’s takings challenge, however, it does not justify preliminary injunctive relief.”
Just because she says so, and she has all the power.
Where we stand now is unless the D.C. Appeals Court grants the appeal with expedited treatment, on March 26 I and others will become felons if we do not surrender or destroy property previously deemed lawful by the same bureau now saying it’s not.
And the FedGov has filed an opposition to expedite. Of course.
Good on David for soldiering on and going through what will likely be a losing battle.
|
|
On February 28, 2019 at 9:16 am, Fred said:
I certainly do hope he loses the ‘takings’ challenge. A medium term fear that I have regarding Trump’s Red Flag laws is that a challenge will be made under ‘takings’ and be successful, setting the stage for a national gun buyback, a la Australia.
There is really only one question left; who do we have to end to make this all stop?
On March 2, 2019 at 10:12 pm, Dan said:
The ‘bump stock ban’…..like all the 20,000 plus gun laws already ‘on the books’ is a blatant violation of the Second Amendment. The courts simply DO NOT CARE. To virtually all judges…..like virtually ALL politicians, the Constitution is a relic. Something to be ignored as needed and called upon ONLY when doing so serves the agenda. Anyone who actually believes that they a court ANYWHERE in the US will rule IN FAVOR of the
Second Amendment and overturn any of these laws is a fool on a fools errand. One can probably count on two hands ( with fingers left over) the number of judges in America that TRULY believe in the Bill of Rights and will rule in support of them.