Brady Center To New Mexico Sheriffs: We Want Your EMails
BY Herschel Smith
5 years, 7 months ago
ALBUQUERQUE – A nonprofit that pushes for gun-control laws nationwide sent letters Wednesday to numerous New Mexico sheriffs, asking them to provide records related to their coordinated stance against gun-control laws that they do not plan to enforce.
The Brady Center, a Washington, D.C.-based organization, said it requested emails from the sheriffs under the state’s Inspection of Public Records Act, with demands for emailed communication among sheriffs and gun-lobby representatives.
Attorney Jonathan Lowy of the Brady Center said his group is seeking the emails to learn “what possible basis” the sheriffs have for declaring they won’t enforce the laws. Brady also wants to obtain any communication the law enforcement officials had with the National Rifle Association and other gun-rights groups.
I’d be nice to tell them to blow it out of their collective asses, but since it comes with a requirement by law, the Sheriffs are answering.
But I can answer for them. Concerning “what possible basis,” it violates the constitution. There, I’m glad I could be of assistance. Now, go back to your worship of Baal, you pagans.
|
|
On March 29, 2019 at 3:46 pm, Pat Hines said:
Two things. First, I hope the respective sheriffs kept the Inspection of Public Records Act in mind when they communicated. Some of them likely did that, but not all.
Second, they need to have their tax funded attorney’s drag out the process and then hammer them with the constitutional defense method.
Yes, it’s a God granted right to self defense, but one must deal with the communists.
On March 29, 2019 at 3:51 pm, Pat Hines said:
Almost forgot. The Sheriffs need to file charges against the Brady Center for violation of https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/241
The Brady Center certainly qualifies for a conspiracy against rights.
18 U.S. Code § 241. Conspiracy against rights
If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or because of his having so exercised the same; or
If two or more persons go in disguise on the highway, or on the premises of another, with intent to prevent or hinder his free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege so secured—
They shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, they shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 696; Pub. L. 90–284, title I, § 103(a), Apr. 11, 1968, 82 Stat. 75; Pub. L. 100–690, title VII, § 7018(a), (b)(1), Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4396; Pub. L. 103–322, title VI, § 60006(a), title XXXII, §§ 320103(a), 320201(a), title XXXIII, § 330016(1)(L), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 1970, 2109, 2113, 2147; Pub. L. 104–294, title VI, §§ 604(b)(14)(A), 607(a), Oct. 11, 1996, 110 Stat. 3507, 3511.)
On March 30, 2019 at 6:40 am, DAN III said:
JUDICIAL WATCH has a multitude of lawsuits against fedgov agencies. Reason being those fedgov scoundrels IGNORE the Freedom Of Information requests by JUDICIAL WATCH. Fedgov is breaking THEIR own laws when refusing legitimate requests. And no one goes to jail.
Perhaps the involved sheriffs should take a page from fedgov’s own playbook. Ignore the communists of The Brady Center. Let them sue for release of their demanded information ! Oh, and another fedgov trick…redact the crap out of the demanded communications so nobody can make any sense of the document.