Kamala Harris Trolls The Second Amendment
BY Herschel Smith
5 years, 8 months ago
Harris is pulling one of the oldest cons in the book, the “I’m a gun owner but” dodge, and in this case, her “but” is huge. Here’s another trick she’s employing: When she offers a couple of “gun laws” she believes she can pass off as “practical solutions,” note she prefaces them with the phrase “which include.” That means there are plenty more she hasn’t mentioned. Then she ends her pitch with “Period,” as if that’s the end game.
It’s not. What she won’t do is define what new edicts would finally be enough for her to say “No more.” That’s because if she thought she could, she’d be going after a total monopoly of violence. There are some things it’s not prudent to admit just yet, especially since she’s now playing to a bigger crowd than California, and has to at least pretend to be “one of us.”
But it only matters to idiots who don’t know history. The controllers never go after their own – they just go after their enemies so that they can’t defend themselves against [a] individuals, or [b] the state, or in other words, the controllers.
As reader The Alaskan always says, those who want to take your guns are planning on keeping theirs. But of course, her position is essentially no different than that of Pete Buttiegieg or any other democratic candidate.
Finally, we all know that when Ms. Lindsey Graham sends her red flag gun confiscation bill to Trump, he’ll sign it. It was Trump’s idea, just like the bump stock ban. I fear that it someone sent him a new assault weapons ban, he’d sign that too. I can see him wagging his righteous finger at us saying, “No one needs a weapon of war except …”
Because Ms. Graham is a controller too. There isn’t a dime’s worth of difference between Ms. Graham and Kamala Harris.
On April 15, 2019 at 4:19 am, Roger J said:
“Military style semi automatic” is an expandable term which might include the M1 Garand rifle, the M1 Carbine, M1911 and Hi-Power pistols, SIGs and Glocks. And, that is the idea. That’s why the anti-gun media have embraced the “MSSA” term previously specific to New Zealand firearm regulations.
On April 15, 2019 at 12:51 pm, DAN III said:
How about someone addressing the fact that Harris is NOT A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN ? She is no more than another usurper to the United States Constitution, Article 2, Section 1, Clause V. She is the product of misinterpretation of Amendment 14 and thus considered a “citizen”. However, she is not a natural born citizen. Thus ineligible to be POTUS ! Harris’ parents were foreign nationals birthing her on American soil. Harris is an anchor baby ! Of course that didn’t stop the illegal Indonesian soetoro-obama from being a fraudulent POTUS ! Nor did the US Constitution prevent non-natural born Canadian-Amerikan Ted Cruz or Cuban-Amerikan Marco Rubio from running for POTUS, did it ?
The U.S. Constitution is long-dead. Every Article, every Amendment has been compromised and ignored. Or rewritten by a federal judge to mean other than what it actually means !
Isn’t it time we dismiss the likes of Constitutional frauds like Harris, soetoro-obama, Cruz and Rubio from having any legitimacy ? Codrea lends credence to usurpers like Kamala Harris by recognizing her attacks on the Constitution as having any pertinent meaning.
Perhaps David Codrea and other journalists/bloggers need to start acknowledging the United States Constitution. Without delay or asinine excuses, start dismissing anything usurpers have to say about the 2nd Amendment or any part of the United States Constitution !
Harris is a fraud ! Dismiss her and the aforementioned usurpers from any political legitimacy. Otherwise, just say a prayer for the Republic. May she rest in peace.
On April 16, 2019 at 8:09 am, Ned said:
When the Democrat debates happen, it will likely be a whorefest of who can take away guns the fastest and give people who won’t work lots of your money.