So Just How Bad Are The NRA’s Troubles?
BY Herschel Smith5 years, 7 months ago
If the New York attorney general Letitia James found sufficient cause and evidence that the NRA was violating the rules and regulations governing nonprofits, she could attempt to force the dissolution of the organization. This would undoubtedly set off a massive legal fight and ironically, be one of the most galvanizing threats the NRA could ever want. You want to get a lot more donations and renewed memberships? Argue that the New York state government is attempting to destroy the organization.
A more likely scenario is that James puts the organization through the wringer, legally, exposing every bloated contract, every dubious expenditure, and every violation of state regulations. She may not dissolve the organization, but she is likely to attempt to impose a massive fine, crippling the organization’s already-shaky finances. What’s more, depending upon what the investigation found, it could dispirit many NRA members, exacerbating existing concerns among some members that their membership dues and donations are being spent on luxuries.
In other words, what the NRA is being investigated about has very little to do with gun laws.
The NRA’s board of directors is operating in extraordinarily tight-lipped manner but referred certain matters to their internal ethics committee Monday. As discussed this weekend, if they did want to remove an officer such as executive vice president Wayne LaPierre, it would take 15 days and a hearing, and three-quarters of the board’s 76 members would have to agree.
Two years ago, at the NRA convention in Atlanta, LaPierre was on top of the world. Donald Trump, once a supporter of certain gun-control proposals, had been elected president with resolutely pro–Second Amendment stance and the help of the NRA. Neil Gorsuch was on the Supreme Court, and a pro–Second Amendment majority on the nation’s highest court appeared secure. A pro-gun GOP majority controlled the House and Senate.
LaPierre has been executive vice president of the NRA — and the guy really running the show day to day — since 1991. His watch has seen the enactment of the Assault Weapons Ban and its expiration, the Columbine shootings and our chilling ongoing era of school shootings, the enormously consequential Heller decision at the Supreme Court, booming gun sales during the Obama years, and the formation of new, exceptionally well-funded gun control groups by former New York City mayor Mike Bloomberg. He’s seen the gradual extinction of pro-gun Democratic elected officials, particularly in Washington. After Trump won, some wondered if he would ride off into the sunset and let someone else take over the NRA.
After this past week, he may wish he had.
When a man gets power, he rarely likes to give it up. Corrupt men desire power over others, but when they get that power, the power itself corrupts further.
As I’ve said, I suspect the Board of Directors bears a lot of financial and legal liability for what’s going on, and they may wish they had taken tighter control of things before this is all over.
On May 2, 2019 at 3:33 am, Nosmo said:
No idea how to successfully, and with reasonable impartiality, to institute it, but it’s becoming apparent there’s a need for term limits in the “executive leadership” offices, and a lot fewer than 76 seats on the board.
I’m not suggesting the actions of the NYAG are, or will be, productive for the NRA – it’s a direct attack on the organization which avoids the appearance of being about gun laws but the attack isbecause of gun laws – but I’m not convinced putting some NRA blood on the floor is a completely Bad Thing; the organization is desperately in need of some serious re-focusing.
On May 2, 2019 at 1:35 pm, Fred said:
“Two years ago, at the NRA convention in Atlanta, LaPierre was on top of the world. Donald Trump, once a supporter of certain gun-control proposals, had been elected president with resolutely pro–Second Amendment stance and the help of the NRA. Neil Gorsuch was on the Supreme Court, and a pro–Second Amendment majority on the nation’s highest court appeared secure. A pro-gun GOP majority controlled the House and Senate.”
None of this is true. If you believed it then, well, even though it wasn’t true, that’s one thing. If you still believe it, that’s one twisted religion you’ve got there.