Further Fisking Of Chuck Canterbury’s Second Amendment Credentials
BY Herschel Smith
5 years, 6 months ago
A reader sends the following references today.
First of all, Senators Feinstein, Warner, Schumer and DeWine claimed support from the Fraternal Order of Police when they introduced a renewed “assault weapons” ban in 2006. This is exactly within Canterbury’s tenure, who has been president since 2003.
But is this accurate? According to NBC news it is.
National police organizations such as the International Association of Chiefs of Police, the International Brotherhood of Police Officers and the Fraternal Order of Police all support the renewal of the ban. President Bush has said he would sign such a bill if Congress passed it.
To be precise, this report is from two years earlier when Bush was president, but it does show support for a renewed AWB (by the way, did you know that Bush had agreed in principle to renewal of the ban?).
Finally, the Fraternal Order of Police is credited with assisting Vice President Biden in formulating the language of the renewed ban, and FOP representatives were standing on stage during the presentation as a show of support for a renewed ban.
But according to Chuck Canterbury, who also supports universal background checks and complete law enforcement access to medical records, “I take a back seat to no one in my reverence for the Second Amendment.”
So in addition to knowing that he is a gun controller, you now know that he is a shameless liar.
|
|
On May 29, 2019 at 11:04 pm, Pat Hines said:
From NAGR:
Breaking News! Anti-Gunner Nominated as Next ATF Director
https://nationalgunrights.org/resources/news/breaking-news-anti-gunner-nominated-as-next-atf-director/
On May 30, 2019 at 7:16 am, Mark Matis said:
So what does the NRA say about him???
On May 30, 2019 at 7:18 am, Fred said:
“…reverence for the Second Amendment.”
I was going to mention this yesterday but since it’s here again today I’ll say that I don’t think that he isn’t lying. It’s the way their minds work. He has reverence for it in the sense of it being a museum piece, a thing of the past to be admired is it turns to dust. Or, perhaps, he understands it being godless and desirous of mass murder in that he sees it as giving positive rights to the government ‘militia’ but I don’t think that he’s lying. He’s a true believer, a very dangerous type of man. A man that believes the fables of his mind’s own creation is to avoided at all times.