Because We Can’t Have People Defending Their Lives In Our State
BY Herschel Smith
5 years, 5 months ago
A 64-year-old New York state man who was arrested for possession of an illegal handgun after he fatally shot a pair of prowlers rooting through his home Tuesday afternoon reportedly told the district attorney the weapon he used in self-defense was his dead father’s and he forgot to register it.
Ronald A. Stolarczyk was charged with felony possession of an illegal handgun, New York State Police said in a news release.
At about 2:40 p.m., officials say Stolarczyk interrupted a man and woman burglarizing his home in Deerfield, New York, located about four hours north of New York City. Stolarczyk then shot the two suspects, according to police.
But the 64-year-old was later arrested after authorities said they determined the handgun used in the shooting was illegally owned.
One of the alleged burglars, identified by state police as 57-year-old Patricia Anne Talerico of Utica, was pronounced dead at the scene. The second alleged intruder, her nephew, 27-year-old Nicholas Talerico of Utica, was transported to a hospital and died of his injuries.
“The word that we had originally was a possible home invasion, possible suspect running at large,” New York State Police Trooper Jack Keller told WSYR-TV. “We were able to quickly identify who those people were identified as…but also we were able to determine quickly that there was no one else and the public was not in danger at all.”
Police said they found items belonging to Stolarczyk at Nicolas Talerico’s home, indicating he may have burglarized his home before, WCSI reported. It’s unclear if Stolarczyk knew him.
Stolarczyk was arrested and charged with criminal possession of a firearm and was transported to the Oneida County Jail, where he’s awaiting centralized arraignment, according to state police.
The District Attorney’s office and police continue to investigate Stolarczyk and the potential motive of the burglars.
Because the only people made in God’s image in New York are law enforcement officers, we can’t let you do that. You’re the real criminal here, and not only that, we will investigate you until we find a motive behind this that justifies the home invasion.
Just because. Suck it. They don’t call us controllers for nothing, capisce?
|
|
On May 31, 2019 at 6:31 am, mobius said:
criminal(ised) possession of a firearm.
Fixed it for them.
On May 31, 2019 at 6:38 am, ragman said:
No better than the Soviet Union, East Germany, Cambodia or any other totalitarian government. People that live in that dump are subjects not citizens. I refuse to spend one penny in the people’s republic of NY. Money is one thing they understand and they ain’t getting any of mine.
On May 31, 2019 at 7:21 am, Frank Clarke said:
So the NYStaPo got him, huh?
Demand a jury trial, hire a lawyer “for procedural advice only”, and represent yourself in court so you can argue the law is both immoral and unconstitutional.
Yes, the judge will forbid him making such arguments. Argue them anyway. What’s the judge going to do, throw him in jail for contempt?
There’s a good chance, based on the historical record, that the jury will walk him. If not, perhaps the NYSRPA would like to take THIS one to the Supreme Court.
NY’s hired lawyers will balk at arguing such a case at ANY level of the soi-disant “justice system”. They’ll wet themselves at the thought of telling 9 SCOTUS judges how inherently proper is their prohibition on armed self-defense.
On May 31, 2019 at 7:44 am, Fred said:
This is really sad, I agree, the po po is going to try to pin some stuff on him so the gun registration thing will go to the back burner, or just because. The tone is awful, it’s Stasi, the po po got some old man defending himself and will pile on charges?
What of God?
On May 31, 2019 at 8:04 am, Bram said:
As long as this guy has a clean criminal record and the gun was originally legal (not stolen, etc.) – sounds like a perfect test case for NRA lawyers to appeal all the way. They probably won’t, but they should.
On May 31, 2019 at 10:46 am, revjen45 said:
Hey, at least he killed them both. What else would one expect? Bernie Goetz shot all those ghetto chimps in self defense and got a gun beef too.
When they tell us they support 2A this is what they mean.
On May 31, 2019 at 11:03 am, George said:
Clown World indeed!!
On May 31, 2019 at 4:34 pm, Pat Hines said:
I hope some group takes up his case and challenges the state of New York on their egregious laws.
If there was real justice in New York the cops who arrested Mr. Stolarczyk and the DA who is prosecuting him would be arrested, charged, convicted, and imprisoned.
On May 31, 2019 at 9:25 pm, Heywood said:
@Bram
NRA lawyers actually fight a battle? I think not. They prefer to snatch defeat out of the jaws of victory.
On June 1, 2019 at 4:09 am, Dan said:
Another case of “Bernie Goetz” syndrome where the state DESPERATELY wants to destroy a man for having the balls to defend himself but can’t so they do the only thing they can…..persecute him for possessing tools to
facilitate self defense.
On June 1, 2019 at 6:57 pm, Gryphon said:
Two sets of “laws”. One for the goyim sheeple, one for the (((controllers))). Look up about “Noachide Laws” and its (((origins))) in the babylonian talmud…
On June 2, 2019 at 3:01 pm, Ned2 said:
I sense a sudden increase in the sales of backhoes in New York state.
On June 2, 2019 at 7:34 pm, elysianfield said:
Apparently, the law in New York State provides that if you are unfortunate enough to become a victim, you must remain a victim….
In effect, if some scumbag targets you for some criminal activity, your life is functionally over, unless the scumbag allows you to live.
On June 3, 2019 at 7:39 am, Talktome said:
I can’t tell if this guy was indicted by a grand jury or not. If so, shame on New Yorkers that don’t live in the city for sending this case forward. I guess they all think that only the state gets to defend itself- serfs, er, I mean citizens, not so much. As others said, get a trial by jury and explain that the cops weren’t there so he had to take care of it himself. Play up the “in fear for my life” as that seems to wake the sleeping to at least consider a human is allowed to fight for their life.