Andrew Napolitano On The Second Amendment
BY Herschel Smith5 years, 2 months ago
Last weekend’s mass murders in El Paso, Texas, and Dayton, Ohio, have produced a flood of words about everything from gun control to mental illness to white nationalism. Most of those words have addressed the right to keep and bear arms as if it were a gift from the government. It isn’t.
The U.S. Supreme Court has twice ruled in the past 11 years that the right to keep and bear arms is an individual pre-political liberty. That is the highest category of liberty recognized in the law. It is akin to the freedoms of thought, speech and personality. That means that the court has recognized that the framers did not bestow this right upon us. Rather, they recognized its pre-existence as an extension of our natural human right to self-defense and they forbade government — state and federal — from infringing upon it.
He’s right about the pre-theoretical nature of rights, but wrong about one thing. We have no natural right to anything except to be judged by God. We are His creatures, and the clay has no say over what the potter does (Romans 9). We have a God-given right to bear arms, not a “natural right.” I loath the term natural rights, and I am not a follower of Hobbes, Locke or any of their ilk.
It would be exquisitely unfair, profoundly unconstitutional and historically un-American for the rights of law-abiding folks — “surrender that rifle you own legally and use safely because some other folks have used that same type of weapon criminally” — to be impaired in the name of public safety.
It would also be irrational. A person willing to kill innocents and be killed by the police while doing so surely would have no qualms about violating a state or federal law that prohibited the general ownership of the weapon he was about to use.
[ … ]
Can the government constitutionally outlaw the types of rifles used by the El Paso and Dayton killers? In a word: No. We know that because in the first Supreme Court opinion upholding the individual right to keep and bear arms, the court addressed what kind of arms the Second Amendment protects. The court ruled that the Second Amendment protects individual ownership of weapons one can carry that are of the same degree of sophistication as the bad guys have — or the government has.
So he’s right about this. But don’t expect the congress or president to know anything about this. Washington, D.C., is the home of gargoyles, demons and pit vipers.
On August 12, 2019 at 3:35 pm, Mack said:
However, the Progressive rationale persists; perhaps is even dominant. Such as:
The Danger of Claiming That Rights Come From God
Better to acknowledge that rights arise from human progress
* https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/our-humanity-naturally/201610/the-danger-claiming-rights-come-god
The danger of God-given rights
* https://religionnews.com/2017/12/15/the-bill-of-rights-thomas-jefferson-and-the-danger-of-god-given-rights/
These views are dangerous; even lethal.