My Unmet Challenge On Smart Guns
BY Herschel Smith
5 years, 1 month ago
Via this smart post, I saw a researcher at Sandia National Laboratory had been working in the past on smart guns. In the past he has observed the following concerning smart guns.
There are many items that the models could not demonstrate to the officers. A few of these are the technology’s cost, reliability, and adversarial strengths. Items like these will remain a concern for officers until a fieldable prototype is thoroughly tested.
Yea, I’ll bet. To this, I’ll say the following as I’ve said before.
Perform a fault tree analysis of smart guns. Use highly respected guidance like the NRC fault tree handbook.
Assess the reliability of one of my semi-automatic handguns as the first state point, and then add smart gun technology to it, and assess it again. Compare the state points. Then do that again with a revolver. Be honest. Assign a failure probability of greater than zero (0) to the smart technology, because you know that each additional electronic and mechanical component has a failure probability of greater than zero.
Get a PE to seal the work to demonstrate thorough and independent review. If you can prove that so-called “smart guns” are as reliable as my guns, I’ll pour ketchup on my hard hat, eat it, and post video for everyone to see. If you lose, you buy me the gun of my choice. No one will take the challenge because you will lose that challenge. I’ll win. Case closed. End of discussion.
Care to take the challenge, Mr. Weiss?
|
|
On October 27, 2019 at 10:51 am, Skid Marx said:
Smart guns, stupid phones, text gibberish for communication, a mongoloid sub 85 IQ nation. A Zimbabwe, Cuba, North Korea hybrid utopia.
The Great Leap Forward.