Arguments Set For Case Of Ohio Gun Owner Drunk Inside House
BY Herschel Smith
5 years, 1 month ago
Via David Codrea, yes, you read the title line correctly. Nanny state now wants to intrude into your home.
The Ohio Supreme Court will hear arguments in February to decide whether a law prohibiting gun owners from carrying firearms while intoxicated should be applied inside a gun owner’s home.
Lawyers for a Clermont County man arrested in 2018 after he acknowledged having an unloaded shotgun while drunk say the law is unconstitutional when applied to homeowners.
They say a person’s sobriety or intoxication level should have nothing to do with possessing a weapon “in the hearth and home.”
Gun control advocates argue the safety of Ohio residents and responding police officers would be jeopardized if the court overturned the arrest.
A man’s home, where cops shouldn’t be anyway. Now they want to control your actions inside your own home if you happen to have a gun.
It never stops. Note. The controllers never stop. Compromise has always been a one-way street, because the pathological drive of the controllers is always to seek more control over your lives.
|
|
No comments yet.
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL
Leave a comment