Opinion.
I am asking everyone to consider the folly of passing State Law S-139 (Open Carry).
As a gun owner, concealed carry weapons permit holder and a member at a local shooting range. I applaud our state’s concealed carry permitting program and my fellow South Carolinians who have taken advantage of it. It is comforting to know that so many of our residents are responsible and committed gun owners.
The proposed changes to S 139 (with or without a permit) do nothing to ensure gun rights. In fact, they would do more to erode the rights of the majority of our population who do not choose to arm themselves every time they leave home. Instead, they would become vulnerable to a minority of individuals who, for reasons of their own, feel they must display their power on their hip.
Perhaps the armed stranger has had hours of classroom and range time … perhaps not. How would we know?
I have written before that “I don’t want an amateur with a gun anywhere near me. I certainly don’t want to be one.” By passing constitutional carry/open carry, we are not serving our citizens. In fact, it is just the opposite. We allow a portion of our population to endanger themselves and their neighbors.
If we have learned anything from the opioid epidemic, it is that a large number of people simply cannot be trusted to behave. We fail this population and their victims by promoting open carry and the display of firearms with or without a permit.
We have an opportunity in South Carolina to set the bar for gun rights, gun safety and responsible stewardship of the Second Amendment. With or without a permit, constitutional/open carry accomplishes none of this.
Bill Ware, Spartanburg
Well Bill, I think you have psychological problems.
First, as to your remark “Perhaps the armed stranger has had hours of classroom and range time … perhaps not. How would we know?,” you’ve neglected to address the very issue that defeats your argument. Concealed carry, which you allege to support.
You also don’t know whether a person is carrying concealed, you see? You’ve stated that the only problem as you see it is that when someone hides a weapon, you don’t have to think about the fact that someone could intend to bring your harm, but when they openly carry, you must think about that fact.
This is entirely a mental problem with you, you see? This has nothing whatsoever to do with the question can someone be safe with a firearm, can someone bring you harm, can someone be trusted. It has only to do with your mental state. I refuse to be part of your twisted mental world where hiding problems makes them go away. I hope South Carolina residents see this the way I do.
Second, as to your statement that “a large number of people simply cannot be trusted to behave,” you don’t know that. You just made it up. You’re in the same category of the chicken little naysayers in Texas, Oklahoma and elsewhere who said “There will be blood running in the streets” if this law passes.
And none of that happened. In fact, I live in an open carry state, and there isn’t blood running in the streets. So you see, you made a problem out of something that isn’t. You fabricated a falsehood.
Finally, since the RKBA is a God-given right, I’m not beholden to your views of making the world a better place for you and other collectivists. That’s not the purpose of the second amendment. The second amendment is a right, not a license for you to try to control other people.
You have things exactly backwards.