Continuation Of The Obscene Putnam County Sheriff’s Department Saga
BY Herschel Smith
4 years, 9 months ago
Recall that one crud, vulgar, obscene Putnam County Sheriff’s Deputy violated a man’s rights guaranteed under the second and fourth amendments by an illegal and unconstitutional detention?
Also recall that we covered the violation of the fourth amendment by Putnam County Deputies about three weeks ago?
The lawyer in these cases has a new video up with more than we linked in the last video. Watch it entirely.
His name is John H. Bryan, and he’s doing God’s work. His web site is thecivilrightslawyer.com, and he has a new post up on the current status of the open carry case.
The judges in this case were very dismissive of the Fourth Circuit decision in Black because they just don’t care about the constitution, but I hope he carries this all the way to the Supreme Court if needed.
Further, I’ll say one more time, it never even needed to get to the point of citing Black. West Virginia is not a “stop and identify” state, and this wasn’t a “Terry Stop.” The state courts should have struck this all down and reprimanded the Sheriff’s department.
I’ll also say once again that Sheriff Steve Deweese should resign in shame, and remember his contact information: sdeweese@putnamwv.org.
Also remember this man. prosecutingattorney@putnamwv.org (Mark A. Sorsaia, Office of the Prosecuting Attorney, Putnam County Judicial Building).
The deputies, crooks and thugs they are, are merely following the leadership set before them. Followers always behave like their leaders. To the Sheriff, you need to get up in front of your church, beg for forgiveness, ask to be placed under the discipline of the leaders of your church, resign your post, and do something you’re qualified to do, like dig ditches while serving your time in prison.
On March 6, 2020 at 8:25 am, Ned said:
So we now need video surveillance systems to record Armed Government Workers trespassing on our property. Without the video, the evidence would consist of a swearing contest between a citizen and a group of deputies.
AGW testimony is always preferred by courts over mere citizens.
On March 7, 2020 at 5:56 pm, X said:
Hollow rhetoric… does not apply to SAFE Act, Sullivan Law, or red flag… what’s the point???
https://www.democratandchronicle.com/story/news/2020/03/07/new-york-town-defy-future-state-gun-restrictions-others-may-join/4985279002/