Obviously, none of them actually care about Trump. Trump isn’t even a speed bump in their operation. It’s quite bazaar to continue in the notion that any of this has anything at all to do with Trump. What’s being done to America is a century old now. Trump wasn’t even born when this started. Is he a minor annoyance? Maybe, but if so, he sure does play along nice. Why, logically, wouldn’t they leave Trump installed? He’s been completely ineffective as any kind of a counter to the communists and dances rather nicely to what he is told. No, this isn’t about Trump at all. Trump is a fiction at this point. In fact, it’s more advantageous to the mission of commies to leave him installed because of the, straw man or real opponent that is a motivating factor of the Left. Nah, they don’t care about Trump beyond his usefulness…that’s the lesson, they don’t care about anyone or anything beyond it’s usefulness to the Revolution.
On June 1, 2020 at 12:56 pm, George 1 said:
You are right Fred. This started long ago. The 1965 Immigration Act made it a sure thing. Then Ronald Reagan signed the 1986 Immigration Act. The 1986 Act sped the decline up about 30 years.
Anyway this is late stage empire and was all perfectly predicable. It is how all empires end up.
On June 1, 2020 at 5:23 pm, Lori G said:
So let me get this straight…..Nato is our enemy, maybe China and Russia are our friends? I would agree that this is like a color revolution, but at it’s root is communism, not NATO. Communists do want NATO disbanded, though, and so they discredit it.
NATO generals and resources were neck deep in the McCain, Graham, Petraeus, etc., plan to topple Libya, Syria and the entirety of Northern Africa, and open supply lines for precious metals, gems, money, weapons and children.
NATO, like these men, along with various military contractors, was deeply involved in human trafficking through that part of the world, as well as the setup for ISIS and arming them.
On June 1, 2020 at 8:27 pm, Fred said:
Additionally, NATO is an international organization. At it’s core is a supposed military function between post WWII allied western powers. But, and this is what he is primarily talking about, it provides cover of diplomatic immunity for travel and transport among a much wider swath of “pro western” countries and areas for mid level staffer types and “military liaison” officers and such.
War is politics. NATO is ostensibly the shooting arm of that politics for a collection of nations. Turkey is still a member while hoards of barbarians are purposefully delivered into the West. Tells you all you need to know about the seriousness of NATO as a military umbrella to protect Europe.
NATO, just another covenant broken. Period.
On June 1, 2020 at 10:43 pm, George 1 said:
I remember when the video of McCain meeting with the “freedom fighters” of Syria came out. In the video one of the “freedom Fighters” was clearly Al Baghdadi himself. McCain later denied it was Baghdadi but it was certainly him.
This article is filed under the category(s) Politics and was published June 1st, 2020 by Herschel Smith.
If you're interested in what else the The Captain's Journal has to say, you might try thumbing through the archives and visiting the main index, or; perhaps you would like to learn more about TCJ.
On June 1, 2020 at 12:23 pm, Fred said:
Obviously, none of them actually care about Trump. Trump isn’t even a speed bump in their operation. It’s quite bazaar to continue in the notion that any of this has anything at all to do with Trump. What’s being done to America is a century old now. Trump wasn’t even born when this started. Is he a minor annoyance? Maybe, but if so, he sure does play along nice. Why, logically, wouldn’t they leave Trump installed? He’s been completely ineffective as any kind of a counter to the communists and dances rather nicely to what he is told. No, this isn’t about Trump at all. Trump is a fiction at this point. In fact, it’s more advantageous to the mission of commies to leave him installed because of the, straw man or real opponent that is a motivating factor of the Left. Nah, they don’t care about Trump beyond his usefulness…that’s the lesson, they don’t care about anyone or anything beyond it’s usefulness to the Revolution.
On June 1, 2020 at 12:56 pm, George 1 said:
You are right Fred. This started long ago. The 1965 Immigration Act made it a sure thing. Then Ronald Reagan signed the 1986 Immigration Act. The 1986 Act sped the decline up about 30 years.
Anyway this is late stage empire and was all perfectly predicable. It is how all empires end up.
On June 1, 2020 at 5:23 pm, Lori G said:
So let me get this straight…..Nato is our enemy, maybe China and Russia are our friends? I would agree that this is like a color revolution, but at it’s root is communism, not NATO. Communists do want NATO disbanded, though, and so they discredit it.
On June 1, 2020 at 6:47 pm, Herschel Smith said:
NATO generals and resources were neck deep in the McCain, Graham, Petraeus, etc., plan to topple Libya, Syria and the entirety of Northern Africa, and open supply lines for precious metals, gems, money, weapons and children.
NATO, like these men, along with various military contractors, was deeply involved in human trafficking through that part of the world, as well as the setup for ISIS and arming them.
On June 1, 2020 at 8:27 pm, Fred said:
Additionally, NATO is an international organization. At it’s core is a supposed military function between post WWII allied western powers. But, and this is what he is primarily talking about, it provides cover of diplomatic immunity for travel and transport among a much wider swath of “pro western” countries and areas for mid level staffer types and “military liaison” officers and such.
War is politics. NATO is ostensibly the shooting arm of that politics for a collection of nations. Turkey is still a member while hoards of barbarians are purposefully delivered into the West. Tells you all you need to know about the seriousness of NATO as a military umbrella to protect Europe.
NATO, just another covenant broken. Period.
On June 1, 2020 at 10:43 pm, George 1 said:
I remember when the video of McCain meeting with the “freedom fighters” of Syria came out. In the video one of the “freedom Fighters” was clearly Al Baghdadi himself. McCain later denied it was Baghdadi but it was certainly him.