Justice Clarence Thomas On Failure To Grant Certiorari
BY Herschel Smith4 years, 5 months ago
That inaction continued today. Once again, the Court refused to hear a major Second Amendment case. And once again, the Court’s failure to act prompted a sharp complaint from Justice Clarence Thomas, who upbraided his colleagues this morning for “prolonging our decade-long failure to protect the Second Amendment.”
Thomas’ complaint came in the form of a dissent from the denial of certiorari in Rogers v. Grewal. The case dealt with New Jersey’s requirement that any person seeking to get a handgun carry permit must first demonstrate to the satisfaction of the authorities “that he has a justifiable need to carry a handgun.” Among other things, the applicant must “specify in detail the urgent necessity for self-protection, as evidence by specific threats or previous attacks which demonstrate a special danger to the applicant’s life that cannot be avoided by means other than by issuance of a permit to carry a handgun.” Under the rules, “generalized fears for personal safety are inadequate.”
Thomas Rogers, who operates a business that services automated teller machines, wanted to carry a gun for self-defense while out on the job. But he failed to meet the state’s exacting standards. The Supreme Court today declined to take up his constitutional challenge to the gun control regulation.
“In several jurisdictions throughout the country,” Justice Thomas observed of Rogers’ case and others like it, “law-abiding citizens have been barred from exercising the fundamental right to bear arms because they cannot show that they have a ‘justifiable need’ or ‘good reason’ for doing so. One would think that such an onerous burden on a fundamental right would warrant this Court’s review.” Indeed, Thomas continued, “this Court would almost certainly review the constitutionality of a law requiring citizens to establish a justifiable need before exercising their free speech rights. And it seems highly unlikely that the Court would allow a State to enforce a law requiring a woman to provide a justifiable need before seeking an abortion. But today, faced with a petition challenging just such a restriction on citizens’ Second Amendment rights, the Court simply looks the other way.”
Justice Clarence Thomas. The last remaining honorable man and scholar on the Supreme Court. Kavanaugh signed on to the dissent, excepting section 2. Go read section 2. There is no good reason any liberty minded patriot should refuse to sign on to section 2.
The Supreme Court has become a college of swine, a gaggle of clowns; frauds, liars and shysters in robes of tyranny. Roberts is the head clown, the high priest of swindle.
On June 17, 2020 at 8:36 am, Frank Clarke said:
How odd that justices nominated by Republicans are so reticent about defending the Constitution! (Just kidding… it’s not the least bit odd.)
A litmus-test question for anyone about to be elevated to the SC (or any court for that matter) should be:
“Why is there government?”
If the answer isn’t:
“All men are created equal and are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights. To secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men”, the candidate is disqualified.
On June 17, 2020 at 10:15 am, X said:
“The Supreme Court has become a college of swine, a gaggle of clowns; frauds, liars and shysters in robes of tyranny.”
Not a new development. It’s been that way for at least 80 years.