“We do not decide whether DACA (Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals) or its rescission are sound policies. We address only whether the agency complied with the procedural requirement that it provide a reasoned explanation for its action. Here the agency failed to consider the conspicuous issues of whether to retain forbearance and what if anything to do about the hardship to DACA recipients.”
Huh? Is there a logical train of thought here or is it just my dementia kicking in.
Penumbras I guess. Anyway, the Rump in Chief is going to cave and give them all citizenship. It gets browner every day.
OT: Anybody out there from Oklahoma. In its McGirt v Oklahoma ruling SCOTUS basically declared half of OK official Indian Reservation land. The Supreme Court ruled that a huge swath of the state of Oklahoma is Native American land for certain purposes, siding with a Creek Nation man who challenged his conviction by state authorities in the territory.
This includes most of the residents of Tulsa. The gist of the decision takes the States authority to police the area and gives it to the Federal government which was in the wording of the original treaty. Not that this is unfair. Per every treaty with Native American tribes, the US signed the treaty with no intention of ever honoring it. If they wanted room for growth they ought to have added an expiration clause, but they reasoned that they didn’t need one. Now the arrogance of the paleface is coming right back into their face.
After the genocide and the broken treaties this comes no where close to justice. But it is a beginning.
This article is filed under the category(s) Donald Trump,Supreme Court and was published June 19th, 2020 by Herschel Smith.
If you're interested in what else the The Captain's Journal has to say, you might try thumbing through the archives and visiting the main index, or; perhaps you would like to learn more about TCJ.
On July 13, 2020 at 8:55 am, penses said:
Well, I guess it is all over but the crying.
“We do not decide whether DACA (Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals) or its rescission are sound policies. We address only whether the agency complied with the procedural requirement that it provide a reasoned explanation for its action. Here the agency failed to consider the conspicuous issues of whether to retain forbearance and what if anything to do about the hardship to DACA recipients.”
Huh? Is there a logical train of thought here or is it just my dementia kicking in.
Penumbras I guess. Anyway, the Rump in Chief is going to cave and give them all citizenship. It gets browner every day.
OT: Anybody out there from Oklahoma. In its McGirt v Oklahoma ruling SCOTUS basically declared half of OK official Indian Reservation land. The Supreme Court ruled that a huge swath of the state of Oklahoma is Native American land for certain purposes, siding with a Creek Nation man who challenged his conviction by state authorities in the territory.
This includes most of the residents of Tulsa. The gist of the decision takes the States authority to police the area and gives it to the Federal government which was in the wording of the original treaty. Not that this is unfair. Per every treaty with Native American tribes, the US signed the treaty with no intention of ever honoring it. If they wanted room for growth they ought to have added an expiration clause, but they reasoned that they didn’t need one. Now the arrogance of the paleface is coming right back into their face.
After the genocide and the broken treaties this comes no where close to justice. But it is a beginning.