To really test deflection, I’d suggest 2 targets arranged so as to shoot through the first, passing through the foliage and into the second target. This has two benefits; comparing the patterns on the first and second targets should allow you to identify the true deflection, and having a target in front of the brush allows a clear sight picture. Thanks for the videos, I enjoy your work a great deal.
That’s a great suggestion and I guess I wouldn’t have thought of it.
On the other hand, there’s the issue of not being able to see anything through foliage. It might take use of cordage or lasers to get the lines right. I guess it’s how I would have done it and what I thought when I watched the vid.
I saw a good test in a magazine years ago. The test medium was a rack with removable dowels. A bullet would strike two dowels in a rack placed before the target. I liked the test because the “brush” strikes were repeatable and the dowels were the same size and the same distance in front of the target. If memory serves, the results of big heavy and slow “brush busting” projectiles were not necessarily as good as smaller bore faster and longer bullets – which was surprising to me.
This article is filed under the category(s) Firearms,Guns and was published June 25th, 2020 by Herschel Smith.
If you're interested in what else the The Captain's Journal has to say, you might try thumbing through the archives and visiting the main index, or; perhaps you would like to learn more about TCJ.
On June 26, 2020 at 11:54 am, Marlow said:
To really test deflection, I’d suggest 2 targets arranged so as to shoot through the first, passing through the foliage and into the second target. This has two benefits; comparing the patterns on the first and second targets should allow you to identify the true deflection, and having a target in front of the brush allows a clear sight picture. Thanks for the videos, I enjoy your work a great deal.
On June 26, 2020 at 12:00 pm, Herschel Smith said:
Marlow,
That’s a great suggestion and I guess I wouldn’t have thought of it.
On the other hand, there’s the issue of not being able to see anything through foliage. It might take use of cordage or lasers to get the lines right. I guess it’s how I would have done it and what I thought when I watched the vid.
On June 26, 2020 at 4:04 pm, Sanders said:
I do enjoy Paul Harrel’s videos.
On June 26, 2020 at 10:02 pm, BRVTVS said:
IV8888 did a few tests on brush deflection a while back. I thought they did a fairly good sequence of tests. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P5dve7vAY9I
On June 27, 2020 at 12:29 am, Ned said:
I saw a good test in a magazine years ago. The test medium was a rack with removable dowels. A bullet would strike two dowels in a rack placed before the target. I liked the test because the “brush” strikes were repeatable and the dowels were the same size and the same distance in front of the target. If memory serves, the results of big heavy and slow “brush busting” projectiles were not necessarily as good as smaller bore faster and longer bullets – which was surprising to me.