Sixth Circuit Bump Stock Ruling
BY Herschel Smith
3 years, 5 months ago
A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service has voted for rehearing en banc of this case. Sixth Circuit Rule 35(b) provides as follows: The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket sheet as a pending appeal. Accordingly, it is ORDERED, that the previous decision and judgment of this court are vacated, the mandate is stayed, and this case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal.
Short and to the point. This isn’t over yet. It shouldn’t be. It was an awful usurpation of power, and a stupid thing for Trump to do.
|
|
On June 28, 2021 at 8:57 am, Scott said:
Wasn’t the first nor will it be last stupid thing that Trump does. There are no good politicians, or there are no-good politicians!
On June 28, 2021 at 2:22 pm, Fred said:
Trump missed the opportunity and what I perceived to be his actual basis for assuming the position which was the restructuring of the economy back to a US first position. Instead he appointed all the same career flunkies and think tankers with their trickle down money printers that have run government since raygun. William Barr at DoJ was the last ( willful or ignorant I don’t care ) straw. Leopards don’t change their own spots.
Whether knowingly or not, trump turned out to be an agent of the of foreign occupying bankers cartel.
All of that said; I’ve been watching the (real) economy long enough to remember organic and self propelling
On June 28, 2021 at 2:26 pm, Fred said:
I hate the internet. Anyway, organic growth was just catching a spark, something the controllers greatly fear because they hate you and any opportunity for wealth creation outside their control. The shutdowns came at the exact time to crush those hopes.
On June 29, 2021 at 12:19 am, Hudson H Luce said:
This might explain a few things as to the federal government: https://www.fff.org/2020/12/11/the-national-security-establishment-is-in-charge/
This might explain a few more things: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nE5byTkvRXs “The Deep State – Or Double Government”- Michael Glennon, Professor of International Law, Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy, Tufts University: “National security policy in the United States has remained largely constant from the Bush Administration to the Obama Administration. This continuity can be explained by the “double government” theory of 19th-century scholar of the English Constitution Walter Bagehot. As applied to the United States, Bagehot’s theory suggests that U.S. national security policy is defined by the network of executive officials who manage the departments and agencies responsible for protecting U.S. national security and who, responding to structural incentives embedded in the U.S. political system, operate largely removed from public view and from constitutional constraints. The public believes that the constitutionally-established institutions control national security policy, but that view is mistaken. Judicial review is negligible; congressional oversight is dysfunctional; and presidential control is nominal. Absent a more informed and engaged electorate, little possibility exists for restoring accountability in the formulation and execution of national security policy.” https://fletcher.tufts.edu/sites/default/files/pubs_glennon-michael-national-security-double-government.pdf
Of course, since judicial review is negligible; congressional oversight is dysfunctional; and presidential control is nominal, elections might not be a remedy.