Five American small arms adopted by the Taliban – Disgusting!
BY Herschel Smith
3 years, 4 months ago
We surely don’t want these weapons of war coming across the ocean like the disposed Afghans surely will and through the porous border. We need gun control – now!
Maybe this was all planned. Maybe somebody is trying to cover their tracks by handing over weapons technology that ultimately ends up in the hands of Iran, Pakistan and China.
Maybe.
On August 22, 2021 at 9:19 pm, Done. said:
I’m sure the Taliban could set up a mail order service for all those old AK’s…..or something.
On August 22, 2021 at 9:31 pm, George 1 said:
Undoubtedly there was some reason to leave these weapons behind. An evil agenda is in play. Not even this administration is that stupid.
On August 23, 2021 at 9:58 am, penses said:
The “administration” is a facade and yes, incredibly stoopid. But it is not running the country.
Upset. Is that all.
The Government is bringing planes full of Taliban here. Ten uniparty gov’ners have thrown out a wellcoming mat for them. Over 300,000 men and their families. No mention of vetting.
Middle East men of military age are coming across the southern border by the hundreds while the border patrol is baby sitting thousands of children.
All the paleface soldiers defending the country are not wanted. Guess who is going to fill in the slots. As we speak the French, German and Aussie governments are beating the c–p out of their native born citizens using foreign mercs hired to be “policemen.” In this country there are towns and cities with Sharia Law Police.
I would think a man would be more than upset.
“Maybe this was all planned.” Let’s see, correlation, collaboration, consonance, accordance, are those all in my dictionary. But not coincidence.
On August 23, 2021 at 8:41 pm, Georgiaboy61 said:
@ penses
Re: “The Government is bringing planes full of Taliban here. Ten uniparty gov’ners have thrown out a wellcoming mat for them. Over 300,000 men and their families. No mention of vetting.”
The so-called “Red-Green” alliance exists, and it is very real and a threat. This bit of linguistic shorthand or slang refers to the color of the communists, red, and a color characteristic of Islam, green. The “Red-Green” alliance, then, is the joining forces of the communists and the Muslims.
Politics it is said, makes for strange bed-fellows, and we can amend that to geopolitics as well. Under normal conditions, these two factions would seem as incompatible as oil and water, but these are not normal times and they have put aside whatever differences they might normally have in the cause of destroying that which both the communists and Muslims hate and abhor – namely, western civilization, the United States and Christianity.
“The enemy of my enemy is my friend,” and all of that. There may come a time when the useful idiots of the left have exhausted their usefulness to the Saracens, and when that happens, things may get interesting and exciting in all of the wrong kinds of ways for the Reds, but in the meantime, they’re in this alliance. It is also germane to note that it is fashionable on the political left already, and has been for some years now, to convert to Islam, much in the manner the flower-power generation a half-century ago converted to being Hare-Krishnas.
For Trad-Americans this is not good news, since it marks the strategic union of two of the most-genocidal ideologies in human history. Used to be that the Saracens were the uncontested champs in that particular type of blood-letting, but the communists have come on strong in the last century or so.
Muslims have been flooding into the West and the non-Islamic world now for decades, and a number of patterns of behavior have emerged, if one pays attention to such things. One of these patterns, repeated across national lines and borders, is that whenever/wherever Muslims commit acts of jihad (holy war) and crime, and are apprehended, they get treated extremely leniently by the authorities, if they are punished at all.
As author/spy Ian Flemming said, “Once is happenstance, twice is coincidence, three times is enemy action.” What can be inferred from such episodes, which have occurred too often and in too-consistent a pattern to be explained by chance or randomness alone?
One inference is that there is some sort of modus vivendi, some sort of agreement or arrangement which has been worked between the powers-that-be in the Islamic and non-Islamic worlds. Perhaps amongst the globalists themselves, whose ranks we know include a number of Sunni Arab oil billionaires.
Another conclusion is that the continued ransacking and pillage of Old Europe, for example, by Islamic interlopers – indicates just how far the rot has gone. Specifically, the degree to which those in power are also those who hate our civilization and most-hallowed beliefs.
Another hypothesis is that the vast numbers of Muslim military-age men being airlifted to different cities and countries around the world constitute some sort of advanced force in place, whose purpose must include conquest, colonization or both. These young men function, de facto, not unlike Hitler’s SA (“Sturmabteilung”) or Brownshirts, an organized force of paramilitary thugs who acted as shock troops for the national socialists… only they’re doing it in the 21st century and for a different set of masters.
Airlifting in the Taliban would be an act of considerable chutzpah, even for the Left-Deep State, but stranger things have happened.
Re: “In this country there are towns and cities with Sharia Law Police.”
As little as two decades ago, Minneapolis-St. Paul, Minnesota, was considered one of the jewels of the upper-Midwest…. prosperous, clean, scenic, safe, and a pleasant place to call home. Now, among certain people anyway, it is termed “Little Mogadishu,” because it now contains one of the largest concentrations of Somalis anywhere in the world outside of Somalia proper. And it didn’t happen by accident, no matter what the nice little old lady down the street tells you.
On August 24, 2021 at 8:35 am, Alex Lund said:
Do you allow me to be a heretic?
We all know that western governments ship weapons to the supporters of their enemies, e.g. muslims who fight against Syrias Assad etc.
Just imagine the Taliban would do the same. Shipping weapons to the Australian people who are against their lockdown hungry government.
Wouldnt that be irony…
On August 24, 2021 at 10:33 am, penses said:
“Red-Green” alliance” @Georgiaboy61
It’s nothing new. A European alliance with Islam, of one sort or another, goes back a long way.
Dancing with the Devil is a hobby with Western Civilization. European governments from Roman Emperors, to Popes, to the worlds longest lived democracy, Venice, has allied themselves with Muslims. The closest Europe came to being muzzied was when the Turks were in control. The Balkans were easy pickings. The Bulgars, Magyars and others were tribes with Turkish bloodlines. The Serbs put up a good fight but were crushed. The rest of Europe yawned. European countries would ally themselves with the Turks against other Europeans on a regular basis. “The French conquests of Nice (1543) and Corsica (1553) occurred as a joint venture between the forces of the French king Francis I and Suleiman, and were commanded by the Ottoman admirals Barbarossa Hayreddin Pasha and Turgut Reis.”
“The Crimean War was a military conflict fought from October 1853 to March 1856 in which the Russian Empire lost to an alliance of France, Britain, the Ottoman Empire and Sardinia. The immediate cause involved the rights of Christian minorities in the Holy Land, which was a part of the Ottoman Empire. The French promoted the rights of Roman Catholics, while Russia promoted those of the Eastern Orthodox Church. The longer-term causes involved the decline of the Ottoman Empire and the unwillingness of Britain and France to allow Russia to gain territory and power at Ottoman expense. It has widely been noted that the causes, in one case involving an argument over a key, have never revealed a “greater confusion of purpose”, yet led to a war noted for its “notoriously incompetent international butchery.”–infogalactic.com
But Europe didn’t succumb to the Ottomans. Military technology and economics won the battle. The Turks constant warfare bled the empire dry and a refusal to adapt and use new weapons and strategy led to their defeat. The Balkans, like the Reconquesta in Spain, had to fight themselves out from under the Ottoman yoke with little help from “Christian” Europe.
The European lust for land and power and religious hatred resulted in a constant civil war, lasting centuries, ending in 1945. There was never an endeavor similar to the Crusades to push the Turks and Arabs out of Europe or the Middle East. The enemy not only stayed within the gates but he was accepted as a member of the Christian West with the admission of Turkey into NATO in 1952.
Dance with the Devil, the Devil does not change, you do.
On August 24, 2021 at 1:34 pm, Georgiaboy61 said:
@ Alex Lund
Re: “Just imagine the Taliban would do the same. Shipping weapons to the Australian people who are against their lockdown hungry government.
Wouldnt that be irony…”
No, friend, that is known as playing right into the hands of the opposition. The first and only person to accept aid of any kind from the Taliban – let alone weapons or anything that goes “bang” – would henceforth doom the entire group to which he/she belonged – as “supporters of the Taliban.” Or “jihadists” or “terrorists,” etc.
In other words, be careful – very careful – how you pick your allies. Despite the (temporary) utility of their having exposed Crazy Joe as the fraud and senile old man that he is, they are no friends of anyone who considers themselves civilized.
And any non-Muslim who trusts a Muslim is placing himself at grave risk.
On August 24, 2021 at 2:02 pm, Georgiaboy61 said:
@ penses
Re: “The European lust for land and power and religious hatred resulted in a constant civil war, lasting centuries, ending in 1945. There was never an endeavor similar to the Crusades to push the Turks and Arabs out of Europe or the Middle East. The enemy not only stayed within the gates but he was accepted as a member of the Christian West with the admission of Turkey into NATO in 1952.”
“Dance with the Devil, the Devil does not change, you do.”
Your analysis is quite correct. You’ve obviously cracked a history book or two yourself, so well-done in that department.
The soldiers of Allah may be the oldest enemies of western civilization – Christendom as it was then known – but they have a certain integrity insofar as they have beliefs that they won’t compromise and which aren’t for sale.
Over the centuries, however, the Saracens have done a very good job of using divisions within the Christian/non-Muslim world as weapons against that same world. Sometimes, as your post indicates, they didn’t have to do anything at all except sit back and watch us fight internally. “Never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake,” and all of that.
There are two well-researched and written histories of the Islamic conflict with the West, both recent and both by authors known and respected for their insight and knowledge: “The History of Jihad” by Robert Spencer, and “Sword and Scimitar” by Raymond Ibrahim. If one studies these and other histories of the 1,400 year long conflict between Islam and the West (here using the term in its widest possible latitude to include the non-Muslim world), it quickly becomes apparent that fifth-columnists, opportunists, and traitors of various kinds within the West pose at least as much of a danger as any outward threat, perhaps more.
In trying to gain advantage over their fellow Europeans, the Catholics and Protestants sold one-another out to the Ottomans, and when they weren’t betraying each other, they were plotting against the Eastern Orthodox church or the Russian Orthodox church. France vs. England/Great Britain, the Dutch versus the Spanish, the Italian city-states going their own way. The major nations of Europe against Russia. The Hundred Years War; the Thirty Years War; and other smaller conflicts too numerous to recount here.
All of this internecine and sectarian strife provided openings for the soldiers of Allah, which they – as often as not – exploited to their gain.
The nations of the Balkans and Eastern/Southern Europe – to include parts of modern-day Russia – are today more-awake to the Muslim geopolitical threat in part because of the fact that they were all, to a greater or lesser degree, under the Islamic boot of conquest at one time or another over the last 1,400 years. Spain and Portugal, too, since they endured some seven-hundred years of rule by the Moors before King Ferdinand and Queen Isabella finally kicked them out for good in 1492.
Jumping ahead to the post-war world, what “genius” came up with the idea of letting the Turkish fox inside the European hen-house? Regardless of whatever else you may think of the Muslims, they do know how to play the long game, whereas westerners seem always to be so preoccupied with the present and near-term future, that they focus on the short – and get bested every time.
The foreign policy pragmatists will argue that admitting the Turks into NATO was necessary to contain the Soviet Black Sea fleet during the Cold War, and insofar as that is what matters, they were correct in the narrow sense of the word. But by being so short-sighted, they let the oldest and most-determined enemy of European civilization just walk right in the front door. The Cold War is long-over, but the Turks are in Germany now in numbers, and show no sign of leaving. See what I mean? The long game.
Don’t even get me started how the American CIA brought the Muslim Brotherhood to Europe and installed them in a mosque in Munich in the heart of post-war Europe. The spooks down at Langley thought they were using the ‘Brothers, but the Ikhwan were instead playing them for the short-sighted fools they were. From that beach-head, they have spread to every corner of the continent. Again, they play the long game, we do not. Or as the believers say in places like Afghanistan, “They have the watches, we have the time.”
On August 25, 2021 at 9:20 am, penses said:
@Georgiaboy61
“The History of Jihad” by Robert Spencer, and “Sword and Scimitar” by Raymond Ibrahim are on my book shelf along with the Dupuy and Dupuy THE ENCYCLOPEDIA OF MILITARY HISTORY and Fuller’s three volume A MILITARY HISTORY OF THE WESTERN WORLD.
The CIA is all over the Balkans, flipping elections and assassinating right wing politicians, while the State Department is applying pressure to install automated voting machines similar to Dominion’s. Most of the Eastern Europe Countries are beginning to regret joining the sheep-in-wolfs-clothing NATO, which is on the fast track of becoming as repressive as the Russian bear ever was.
On August 25, 2021 at 6:05 pm, Georgiaboy61 said:
@ penses
Re: “The CIA is all over the Balkans, flipping elections and assassinating right wing politicians, while the State Department is applying pressure to install automated voting machines similar to Dominion’s. Most of the Eastern Europe Countries are beginning to regret joining the sheep-in-wolfs-clothing NATO, which is on the fast track of becoming as repressive as the Russian bear ever was.”
Playing dirty pool, so to speak, is what the CIA does and it has been that way for a very long time, pretty much since they were created during the Truman administration. It sounds like you have plenty of reading on your night-stand, but consider “Legacy of Ashes: The History of the CIA” by Tim Weiner, if you have not already read it. It will tear the blinders from your eyes and thoroughly disabuse you of any illusions you may still harbor about the spooks at Langley.
Harry S Truman – an honest man in a town not noted for that trait – possessed enough integrity to admit his mistakes – and later admitted that establishing the Central Intelligence Agency had been one of his worst. He went on to say if he’d known it would turn into what it later became, he’d never have approved its formation in the first place.
Truman was correct insofar as the nation genuinely needs intelligence experts capable of keeping an eye on our international and national interests vis-a-vis strategic information and intelligence, but the CIA is so busy doing wet ops, they don’t seem to find much time anymore for the performance of their basic mission, which was supposed to be the collection/analysis of foreign intelligence. Their fingerprints are all over recent false-flag and regime change ops in places like the Ukraine and Syria, amongst others.
NATO is thoroughly-corrupt and compromised at this late date. It may have been a good idea in the late 1940s, but what was once a great cause henceforth became a business and then degenerated in a racket. NATO doesn’t perform its basic mission of protecting Europe, as millions of “refugees” have stormed Europe’s borders and NATO hasn’t lifted so much as a finger to stop them. They’re too busy looking for non-existent Russian monsters under the bed, and otherwise serving as a tool of the globalists, I guess.
The tragedy is that there was, for a brief time, the chance for a real rapprochement with the Russians in the early-mid 1990s, after the fall of the Berlin Wall and the Iron Curtain. In exchange for concessions on certain matters by Moscow, the U.S. agreed – promised, in fact -that NATO would not expand up to the borders of Russia. A promise the Clinton regime promptly broke, poisoning the chance to repair things with Russia and repair the badly-damaged trust between the two countries.
It is germane to note that resetting relations on a firmer and better basis with Moscow does not mean that the U.S.-NATO would abandon its member states should the Russian bear suddenly get hungry again; it simply meant using a historic opportunity to deescalate tensions between the two Cold War era superpowers.
The bad-faith actions of Brussels and the EU on one hand and NATO on the other, are doing nothing to win any friends in the Visegrad Four nations alliance (Hungary, Poland, Czech Republic, Slovakia),or for that matter, in the Baltic states (Latvia, Estonia, Lithuania) and Eastern Europe/Balkans. With their Cold War past so fresh in mind, trusting Russia is hard, and their allies in the EU + NATO are looking less like friends all the time. Which is one reason they are considering their options for going their own way as an independent alliance.
Probably not a bad idea, since there is strength in numbers and they will then be able to steer the course of their own destiny and as their consciences dictate.