Now you can see why the vaccines were a mistake
BY Herschel Smith
2 years, 11 months ago
If you throw those four mutations into Delta, you have a version that uses your vaccine induced antibody response to its own advantage.
[ … ]
In other words, its mutations look pretty much identical to what the Japanese scientists were warning would allow Delta to use your vaccine induced antibody response to its own advantage. Oops.
[ … ]
I give it two months at most, before you’ll be starting to see a consensus shift: These vaccines were a big mistake. Now you can see why. A new variant emerges that seems to have evolved in someone who was HIV positive while infected for an extended period of time with SARS-COV-2, giving the virus ample time to figure out an optimal solution to the vaccine induced immune response.
The other awkward question they don’t want to address is as following: How are you going to avoid an original antigenic sin response to your new variant specific strain? How do you make sure your new vaccine updated for this new strain isn’t just going to boost the antibodies originally developed against the original strain you vaccinated everyone against? They have no solution. In fact, this new strain spreads so fast that if it escapes our attempts to contain it (which all evidence suggests will be the case), the new variant specific vaccine will come far too late to make a difference.
The post is involved and you can read it for yourself.
But this part in the comments piqued by interest.
DOES NOBODY READ ” FIELDS VIROLOGY PART 1 AND 2 6e EDITION ”
NEVER ! NEVER! NEVER! VACCINATE DURING AN OUTBREAK OR PANDEMY UNLESS YOUR VACCINE KILLS THE PATHOGEN FOR 100% !!!
Later upon request, this link is provided for the text.
I wish I could say that I have the capabilities of an android and have already studied this, but that wouldn’t be true.
For those among us who (a) have a medical background, and (b) have studied this text, feel free to give us the pedestrian summary on why you never vaccinate in the middle of a pandemic unless the vaccine kills the pathogen 100%.
And if you’re in the medical community, you can follow that up by explaining if you were against administration of the vaccine to patients, and if not, why not, based on your knowledge of the material in this text?
On November 29, 2021 at 7:21 am, EJ the nurse said:
I think Geert VandenBossch has addressed this several time in more depth and with more clarity than most can. He was warning about why not to vaccinate in a pandemic publicly before most were.
He has the credentials and work background to address this topic.
Vaccination into a pandemic creates selective evolutionary pressure for resistant strains to propagate. The current vaccines only look at one protein from the virus, also one of the parts changed most. Immune system will over prepare for this protein and not be ready for a different one or possibly seasonal flu too.
Boosters may cause the body’s cellular defense budget is all spent on the last battle’s tactics and can’t adapt to new tactics. We can have a Maginot line against the alpha variety when the next variant is a blitzkrieg.
The problem is is that this was foreseeable for people in the know. It’s also like the countries that were significantly more than two doses of vaccine for every person in their population. Vaccines and boosters seem to be a means as defeating Covid is not their end goal.
On November 29, 2021 at 7:28 am, VietVet said:
The vaccines aren’t a mistake. They are a weapon.
On November 29, 2021 at 7:29 am, Matt said:
Don’t have a medical background but have been following the SARS-CoV2 science for almost two years.
The problem with a non sterilizing vaccine during a pandemic is that while it may keep the vaccinated individual from getting seriously ill, it also has the side effect of making them into a laboratory for the virus to mutate in ways that enable it to escape the vaccine induced immune response.
In short it puts a lot of evolutionary pressure on the virus.
On November 29, 2021 at 8:59 am, Fred said:
“evolved in someone who was HIV positive while infected for an extended period of time with SARS-COV-2, giving the virus ample time to figure out an optimal solution to the vaccine induced immune response.”
I’m pretty sure this was done in a lab.
On November 29, 2021 at 9:52 pm, BRVTVS said:
And here’s another nail in the vaccine coffin:
From https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/circ.144.suppl_1.10712
“We conclude that the mRNA vacs dramatically increase inflammation on the endothelium and T cell infiltration of cardiac muscle and may account for the observations of increased thrombosis, cardiomyopathy, and other vascular events following vaccination.”