Graphene “Razor Blades” Found In Covid Vaccine
BY Herschel Smith
2 years, 11 months ago
This would explain the massive hemorrhaging one medical professional has been telling me about in surgery. This video comes via correspondent Jeremy Proctor.
On December 2, 2021 at 11:32 pm, George 1 said:
So in addition to destroying the immune system the jab also cuts up your blood vessels.
Nice.
On December 3, 2021 at 5:38 am, Joe Blow said:
I do not believe that man is a native German speaker. His language is not high Deutsch, it’s pigeon Deutsch. Listen to the English mixed in? Said with a cherman accent, totally believable, lol, NOT!!!
On December 3, 2021 at 9:03 am, Frank Clarke said:
I admit I didn’t watch it, but… “one atom layer thick…”?? It would be so thin that the slice it made in a cell wall or blood vessel would be too small to allow a single blood cell to escape. If one is trying to cause hemmorage, a larger tool is required.
On December 3, 2021 at 9:20 am, Chris said:
Did you He committed “Suicide” very recently.
Look it up, his wife’s vid. Its ingerman though
On December 3, 2021 at 10:25 am, Herschel Smith said:
@Frank,
Surely you thought about the capillaries being a pressure vessel and delta-P induced expansion of the perforations before making your comment, right?
On December 3, 2021 at 8:10 pm, BRVTVS said:
@ Frank Clarke
Graphene layers are one atom thick, but much wider and quite strong. In a lab setting, the stuff is often made by lifting layers off of graphite with scotch tape. Assuming these claims are correct, think of it as a very sharp razor.
On December 4, 2021 at 10:53 am, Todd said:
So, any idea why this graphemes hydroxide is in these shots? Does it serve some purpose? Is it listed on the ingredients? Is it part of the inert ingredients they don’t have to disclose? I can’t come up with a good reason for this. It’s interesting that this sorta jibes with another article on the wildly disparate adverse reactions per lot of the Pfizer and modern a chemical injections. Could this be a cause? Could it be inept application of the shot, hitting a vein instead of intramuscular injection? Could those lots with high incidence of bad reactions have been dispensed by morons or lower skilled techs (like pharmacy assistants) vs. more skilled “shooters”? It’s almost like we should have some sort of regulatory agency to get curious about side effects rather than just pushing a single solution.
On December 5, 2021 at 1:56 pm, Hudson H Luce said:
This has been making the rounds lately, with a bunch of other dodgy stuff. The guy claimed to be a chemist, engineer, inventor, activated carbon expert, and nutritional advocate – “Er bezeichnet sich selbst als “Chemiker, Ingenieur, Erfinder, Aktivkohleexperte und Nährstoff Erklärer”(https://www.psiram.com/de/index.php/Andreas_Noack) He studied chemistry at Technisch Universität Darmstadt, but no word as to him getting any kind of degree – and he ended up as essentially a salesman. So I think his use of the word “Doctor” to describe himself is a bit of a stretch.
On this one I think he was simply wrong. We’re looking at half of a milliliter of liquid volume per shot, and the shot is mostly water, so we’re not looking at a lot of graphene oxide (even though he claims that “graphene hydroxide” is present, but blood isn’t acidic enough to accomplish this protonation reaction…), probably no more than a couple of micrograms of graphene oxide per shot. And it’s used in other vaccines as an adjuvant, it’s nothing terribly new, and those other vaccines haven’t had the same terrible effects as this one. Have a look at this – https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/labs/pmc/articles/PMC7557932/ – “Graphene oxide (GO) is a unique single-atom-thick and two-dimensional carbon material arranged in a hexagonal lattice. GO and its derivatives are of immense interest to nanomedicine researchers due to their remarkable electronic, mechanical and thermal properties [113]. GO is widely used as an antibacterial and anticancer agent [114]. GO act as antiviral agent through inactivation of the pathogenic agent of hand-foot-and-mouth disease, EV71 and endemic gastrointestinal avian influenza A virus H9N2 [115]. Nanocomposites consisting of GO and partially reduced sulfonated GO (rGO-SO3) composite showed antiviral activity against HSV-1 by inhibiting HSV-1 from attaching to host cells [116]. The antiviral activity of GO and reduced GO was evaluated against PRV (a DNA virus) and PEDV (an RNA virus) revealing that GO significantly suppressed the infection of PRV and PEDV by a 2-log reduction in virus titers at non-cytotoxic concentrations. GO inhibited viral entry into the host cells by structural destruction [117]. Nanocomposites consisting of GO and AgNPs showed potential antiviral activity against enveloped and non-enveloped viruses, for example, FCoV and IBDV, respectively. Viral inhibition assays demonstrated that GO-AgNPs inhibited FCoV infection by 25% and IBDV by 23%, whereas GO alone only inhibited FCoV infection by 16% but showed no antiviral activity against IBDV infection. Therefore, the combination of GO and AgNPs exhibited better antiviral activity compared to either GO or silver alone [77]. Curcumin-Loaded GO exhibited a significant inhibitory effect on RSV infection with significant biocompatibility. GO inactivates directly by inhibiting the virus from attaching to host cells and considered to be coupled with prophylactic and therapeutic effects on the virus. The combination of GO and curcumin was more effective than either single agent against RSV infection [118]. Iannazzo et al. (2018) reported that the conjugation of GO and QDs (GQDs) potentially inhibited the replication of HIV [119]. Hypericin (HY)-loaded GO protected against novel duck reovirus (NDRV) disease, which is a serious infectious disease of poultry. The antiviral activity of the complex (GO/HY) was studied in DF-1 cells and in ducklings infected with NDRV TH11 strain. GO/HY showed a dose-dependent inhibition of NDRV replication, which may be attributed to direct virus inactivation or inhibition of virus attachment [120].”
So I don’t think the presence of graphene oxide is of great concern. And unless he separated the graphene (oxide/hydroxide) from the blood plasma, and obtained it in a pure state, he’s going to pick up hydroxyl stretching bands from the water in the blood plasma, not the graphene. So it’s a misidentification on his part, and I really don’t think he found graphene hydroxide. As for this “razor blades” stuff, it’s nonsense. He claims that these molecules form “jagged chains” 50 nanometers long. 1 nanometer (nm) is 1×10**(-9) meter – one billionth of a meter. One micron is one millionth of a meter, so these chains are 0.05 micron long. The diameter of a capillary is between 5 to 10 microns, so 100 such chains would be needed to “cut” such capillaries. So I think that claim is just nonsense, and I’d wonder about this guy’s credentials, this is just undergrad stuff here.
And further claims he makes in his video are just totally out to lunch, like saying that polyaromatic hydrocarbon sheets are 1 Ångstrom thick, that’s the length of a C-H sp3 hybridized single bond… and that in the blood, around pH7, that the hydroxy form of graphene oxide, can somehow lose a proton… I checked this guy out, couldn’t find anything in the scientific literature, he claims to be a chemist and an engineer, but I doubt either of those is the case. He had a company which made nutraceuticals, and frankly, I think the guy is an out and out fraud.
On December 5, 2021 at 2:11 pm, Hudson H Luce said:
We know that the vaccines don’t produce immunity, they don’t stop transmission, and they produce huge quantities of cytotoxic spike protein. That’s enough to know, right there, to stop using them or not use them in the first place.