45-70 Versus 30-30

BY Herschel Smith
2 years, 9 months ago

Field & Stream.

This cartridge became available in 1895 in Winchester’s Model 1894 lever action rifle. It was America’s first sporting cartridge to be loaded with smokeless powder and was originally loaded with a 160-grain bullet and 30 grains of powder. This produced a muzzle velocity of about 1950 fps. The cartridge got its name from its .30-caliber (.308-inch) bullet and the 30 grains of powder that fueled it. Since then, the cartridge has been chambered in a wide range of rifles but gained its fame and popularity in the 94 and the Marlin 336.

When it comes to modern .30-30 ballistics, things are a bit improved today. The most common loading is a 150-grain bullet at an advertised 2390 fps. However, for common 20-inch barreled traditional lever guns, real muzzle velocities are closer to 2300 fps. This is a powerful combination and has been used effectively on everything from feral hogs all the way up to moose. You can also get 125 and 170-grain loads, but neither offer any practical advantage over 150-grain loadings, especially the excellent 150-grain Federal HammerDown, which has been specifically tuned for lever guns.

However, there is another option. Hornady offers 140- and 160-grain LEVERevolution loads. What sets these apart is that they utilize a spitzer instead of a round nose bullet. Round nose bullets have always been required in tube fed lever guns, but the soft rubber FlexTip used by Hornady makes these pointy bullets safe in the magazine tube. With the LEVERevolution ammunition the .30-30 has a 13% flatter trajectory and retains about 6% more energy. Regardless the loading, a traditional 30-30 lever gun will recoil between 10 and 13 foot-pounds of energy.

[ … ]

When most think of a 45-70, they think of a 45-70 lever action rifle. However, the first 45-70 was not a lever gun. The cartridge was adopted by the U.S. military in 1873 in the single shot Trapdoor Springfield rifle. The ballistics of original .45-70 ammo was nothing to crow about by today’s standards. It was originally loaded with a 405-grain .45-caliber bullet ahead of 70 grains of black powder, hence the name 45-70. This load had a muzzle velocity of around 1300 fps and compared to modern .45-70 ballistics; it was like throwing a rock. At 200 yards the bullet would drop more than two feet.

With the arrival of the .30-30 Winchester and the 20th Century, interest in the .45-70 waned. It simply could not compete with the flatter shooting .30-30 or the even more modern .30-06. However, in the early 70s Marlin reintroduced their 1895 lever action rifle chambered for the .45-70. A version of Marlin’s much more robust 336 action, the new 1895 could handle ammunition loaded with much higher pressures. Soon, we began to see the second power level of .45-70 ammunition, which included 300-grain bullets being pushed to around 1800 fps. These carried more than 1000 foot-pounds of energy to 200 yards, with trajectories twice as flat as the original loading.

But the advancement in .45-70 ammo did not stop there. The 1895 is a very strong action and companies like Buffalo Bore began loading third power level “heavy” .45-70 ammunition. Recoil is however brutal; out of a Marlin 1895 these heavy loads generate nearly 50 foot-pounds of shoulder shoving punch.

He goes on to discuss some of the advantages and disadvantages, and ends up recommending the 30-30 for white tail and 45-70 for moose and elk (or bear and other dangerous game).

From my perspective, I just don’t want that much shoulder punch.  I’m of the opinion that shooting ought to be a reasonably pleasurable experience, and if it is I’ll do it more and get better at it.

A 30-30 lever action rifle is easy to shoot.  Really easy.  Fun, accurate and pleasurable.

Then again, there are folks who have shot all of these guns so much that it doesn’t really matter.  They’re already that good at it all, so no need for much more time at the range or in the field plinking or target shooting.

And if the really big bore gun meets your needs the best, that’s why we have variety.

By the way, I once knew a Marine Scout Sniper who shot the Barret .50.  He came away with headaches every day from the range because of the concussive blast.


Comments

  1. On March 9, 2022 at 11:34 pm, BRVTVS said:

    This article gets a few historical details wrong. I’m fairly sure the original 1873 loading was closer to 500gr. A reduced recoil loading was later issued with a 405gr bullet and a reduced powder charge for the carbine versions of the trapdoor rifle.

  2. On March 10, 2022 at 12:25 pm, Ned said:

    I used to handload 30-30 with 100 – 110 short jacket roundnose and HP bullets at around 2700 fps. Very low recoil, and accurate to 100 yards in every rifle (3) that we tried them in. 125 HPs also make a low recoil fast load in 30-30 rifles. Remington used to make one. I’m certain they would make a great short distance antipersonnel load as well.

    if you have a 30-30, try light bullets for plinking. You’ll like it.

    Also went the other way and loaded 200 gr GC cast bullets at subsonic velocities. Good results there as well.

    Still love a 45-70 though, despite the recoil.

  3. On March 10, 2022 at 3:05 pm, Ozark Redneck said:

    Having killed both deer and hogs with the 30-30 & 45-70. The old 45-70 load with the 405gr will work just fine at close range. Dropped a hog last year at about 30 yards with that load, shot him in the ear, dropped straight down. I have hand-loaded some hotter ‘bear’ loads, but don’t shoot them much, a couple of rounds of those, like you said.. shoulder punch.

  4. On March 10, 2022 at 3:15 pm, Georgiaboy61 said:

    @ Ned

    Re: “I used to handload 30-30 with 100 – 110 short jacket roundnose and HP bullets at around 2700 fps. Very low recoil, and accurate to 100 yards in every rifle (3) that we tried them in. 125 HPs also make a low recoil fast load in 30-30 rifles. Remington used to make one.”

    That’s a darned fine idea! Thanks for sharing it with us. Would 110-gr. round-nose work OK, similar to what got used in the .30 Carbine round?

    Got a tip in return; maybe you already know it: Lever guns with tube magazines require round-nose or the like for safety reasons, so that under recoil, one or more rounds in the magazine does not get lit off by being pushed against the tip of those behind it. However, there is in theory nothing which prevents the single-loading of a spitzler (pointed) bullet in these rifles. As long as one does not place them end-to-end in the tube magazine, one should be good-to-go.

    It’s sort of a work-around which allows one to extend the useful range of the cartridge while still using the 30-30 case. Of course, now that Hornady has Flex-Tips, the appeal of this may not be what it once was. YMMV.

    Re: “From my perspective, I just don’t want that much shoulder punch. I’m of the opinion that shooting ought to be a reasonably pleasurable experience, and if it is I’ll do it more and get better at it.”

    I am speaking from a position of ignorance in that I do not own a lever-gun in 45-70, nor have I even shot one. However, with that disclosure up-front, it seems to me that many people love lever-guns so much – how handy they are, how well they work for people on horses or in vehicles, how easy they are to pack into the wild – that they put up with punishing recoil from cartridges like 45-70 in order to get those benefits.

  5. On March 10, 2022 at 3:51 pm, Furminator said:

    Had an 1895 guide gun that was quite pleasant to shoot with standard pressure 400 grain loads. Got some Buffalo Bore 400 grain +Ps and shot one wearing a heavy coat with a neoprene knee brace folded up between my shoulder and the gun. Lets just say when I sold the rifle it included 19 rounds of BB ammo.

  6. On March 10, 2022 at 4:01 pm, Herschel Smith said:

    @Furminator,

    Yea. ^^^THAT^^^

  7. On March 10, 2022 at 8:15 pm, Jimmy said:

    Ok, I have to chime in here. I have owned both Marlins and Henrys in 45-70. All of you who think the recoil is “punishing” must not have ever fired one.

    For sure, it depends on the ammo. I shoot the Remington ammo of 405gr at about 1200fps. It’s a pussycat. Everyone that I let shoot it, after the first shot, looks back at me and smiles. “I didn’t know it was so nice to shoot!” is the standard reply.

    405gr at 1200fps is nothing to sneeze at either. It wouldn’t be my first choice for large bear, but consider this. Practice and enjoy the lighter loads. If you are in bear country and have to use a heavier load, I seriously doubt you’ll notice ANY recoil due to adrenaline.

    For you older guys (I’m in my 60’s), the 45-70 is a very enjoyable rifle to shoot. I put it’s recoil at LESS than my .308. FAR less than a 12g semi as well. I love my lever actions.

  8. On March 10, 2022 at 8:59 pm, Fred said:

    Yep, I’m with Jimmy on this. 45-70 is smooth as butter.

  9. On March 10, 2022 at 9:51 pm, Georgiaboy61 said:

    @ Jimmy

    Re: “For you older guys (I’m in my 60’s), the 45-70 is a very enjoyable rifle to shoot. I put it’s recoil at LESS than my .308. FAR less than a 12g semi as well. I love my lever actions.”

    Thanks for the info…. always great to learn something new.

  10. On March 10, 2022 at 11:00 pm, Daniel K Day said:

    I load the 170-gr Lasercast flatnose bullet with 7 or 8 grains of Unique. Feels like shooting a .22, and very accurate in a Marlin 336.
    The worst-kicking 30/30 I ever fired, maybe twice?, was a takedown version of a Mod. 94 a guy had with a curved steel buttplate. That hurt. He regretted it as an impulse purchase. I don’t know if he even has it any more.

  11. On March 11, 2022 at 7:55 am, Ned said:

    GB61 – I used to use both 110 grain HPs and 100 grain short jacket rounds for the 30 carbine. The Hornady round actually has a round nose and a small flat tip. While it may be worrysome to some to not use a flat point in a tubular magazine, it actually takes a pretty serious jolt to detonate a primer in a tubular magazine. (I had data on that once that’s probably not retrieveable.) Recoil is seriously reduced in the 30-30 with these tips even at high velocities (2700+ FPS) so I wasn’t worried about primer detonation even if the tip doesn’t span the distance between the primer and the rim of the cartridge case and appears to rest solely on the primer. Because of the shape, it would have to crush a lot of surface to get a primer to detonate.

    It should be noted that all data was retrieved from reloading manuals, and they are all notoriously conservative in their approach to safety. (YMMV)

    These loads are also explosive on varmints while being gentle on both the shoulder and the pocket book. I never shot a coyote with one, but I expect it would work well. I’ve shot thousands of them, and they’re quite fun and addictive in the 30-30.

  12. On March 11, 2022 at 12:14 pm, xtphreak said:

    @Ned
    I too have loaded .30-30 with 100gr Speer RN half jacket & 110gr Speed HP half jacket for plinking / small game.
    Light recoil and accurate.
    During the Obama .22 LR famine, I even went to a .32 muzzleloader ball (.310″) over 3.5 gr Bullseye.
    Not much if any louder than a .22 LR and satisfying for squirrels.

    Started on “gallery loads” for a 32″ Sharps.
    A 0.457″ round ball over 5 gr Unique is just fun in a heavy long barreled rifle.

    I found the recipe in an old Lyman’s reloading manual for a 144 gr “collar stud” (Lyman mold 457130) that was developed to equivalent weight of a round ball for gallery shooting.

    You hear the hammer click, the gun kinda”snorts” and a “whack” as it hits the target.

    Next I’ll get going on my “bee loads” for snap shooting carpenter bees attacking my log cabin with a .44 Mag (or SPL) or a .45 Colt or a .357 Mag revolver.

    Neighbors think I’m nuts standing there popping bees with a big ole revolver.

  13. On March 11, 2022 at 12:23 pm, xtphreak said:

    By the way the Sharps is a .45/70.

    The bee loads are Ancini de Pepe (tiny pasta beads) over 3.5 gr Bullseye, a cardboard was, fill with ancini de pepe, cover with another was, seal with a drop of wax.

    Vaporizes the bees at 6-8 ft.
    Knocks em down at 10-12 ft.

    I know I shouldn’t shoot the bees, but they’re eating my house and it’s great snap shooting practice!

    To balance it out, the pasta loads are bio-degradable and won’t hurt the finish on wood surfaces.

    Reloading is the only way to develope alternative loads.

    With a assortment of bullets and a few powders, you can use one rifle for a lot of things, revolvers too.

  14. On March 11, 2022 at 12:27 pm, xtphreak said:

    Wow

    The “…cardboard was…” Should read “…cardboard wad…”

    Stoopid smartphone “correcting” me.

  15. On March 12, 2022 at 11:07 am, Ned said:

    XTP – I too have experimented with gallery loads. There’s info in some older manuals. Haven’t tried 45-70 yet. Nice bug load info – thanks.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Leave a comment


You are currently reading "45-70 Versus 30-30", entry #29623 on The Captain's Journal.

This article is filed under the category(s) Firearms,Guns and was published March 9th, 2022 by Herschel Smith.

If you're interested in what else the The Captain's Journal has to say, you might try thumbing through the archives and visiting the main index, or; perhaps you would like to learn more about TCJ.

26th MEU (10)
Abu Muqawama (12)
ACOG (2)
ACOGs (1)
Afghan National Army (36)
Afghan National Police (17)
Afghanistan (704)
Afghanistan SOFA (4)
Agriculture in COIN (3)
AGW (1)
Air Force (40)
Air Power (10)
al Qaeda (83)
Ali al-Sistani (1)
America (22)
Ammunition (285)
Animals (297)
Ansar al Sunna (15)
Anthropology (3)
Antonin Scalia (1)
AR-15s (379)
Arghandab River Valley (1)
Arlington Cemetery (2)
Army (87)
Assassinations (2)
Assault Weapon Ban (29)
Australian Army (7)
Azerbaijan (4)
Backpacking (3)
Badr Organization (8)
Baitullah Mehsud (21)
Basra (17)
BATFE (230)
Battle of Bari Alai (2)
Battle of Wanat (18)
Battle Space Weight (3)
Bin Laden (7)
Blogroll (3)
Blogs (24)
Body Armor (23)
Books (3)
Border War (18)
Brady Campaign (1)
Britain (38)
British Army (35)
Camping (5)
Canada (17)
Castle Doctrine (1)
Caucasus (6)
CENTCOM (7)
Center For a New American Security (8)
Charity (3)
China (16)
Christmas (16)
CIA (30)
Civilian National Security Force (3)
Col. Gian Gentile (9)
Combat Outposts (3)
Combat Video (2)
Concerned Citizens (6)
Constabulary Actions (3)
Coolness Factor (3)
COP Keating (4)
Corruption in COIN (4)
Council on Foreign Relations (1)
Counterinsurgency (218)
DADT (2)
David Rohde (1)
Defense Contractors (2)
Department of Defense (210)
Department of Homeland Security (26)
Disaster Preparedness (5)
Distributed Operations (5)
Dogs (15)
Donald Trump (27)
Drone Campaign (4)
EFV (3)
Egypt (12)
El Salvador (1)
Embassy Security (1)
Enemy Spotters (1)
Expeditionary Warfare (17)
F-22 (2)
F-35 (1)
Fallujah (17)
Far East (3)
Fathers and Sons (2)
Favorite (1)
Fazlullah (3)
FBI (39)
Featured (190)
Federal Firearms Laws (18)
Financing the Taliban (2)
Firearms (1,803)
Football (1)
Force Projection (35)
Force Protection (4)
Force Transformation (1)
Foreign Policy (27)
Fukushima Reactor Accident (6)
Ganjgal (1)
Garmsir (1)
general (15)
General Amos (1)
General James Mattis (1)
General McChrystal (44)
General McKiernan (6)
General Rodriguez (3)
General Suleimani (9)
Georgia (19)
GITMO (2)
Google (1)
Gulbuddin Hekmatyar (1)
Gun Control (1,675)
Guns (2,343)
Guns In National Parks (3)
Haditha Roundup (10)
Haiti (2)
HAMAS (7)
Haqqani Network (9)
Hate Mail (8)
Hekmatyar (1)
Heroism (5)
Hezbollah (12)
High Capacity Magazines (16)
High Value Targets (9)
Homecoming (1)
Homeland Security (3)
Horses (2)
Humor (72)
Hunting (43)
ICOS (1)
IEDs (7)
Immigration (115)
India (10)
Infantry (4)
Information Warfare (4)
Infrastructure (4)
Intelligence (23)
Intelligence Bulletin (6)
Iran (171)
Iraq (379)
Iraq SOFA (23)
Islamic Facism (64)
Islamists (98)
Israel (19)
Jaish al Mahdi (21)
Jalalabad (1)
Japan (3)
Jihadists (81)
John Nagl (5)
Joint Intelligence Centers (1)
JRTN (1)
Kabul (1)
Kajaki Dam (1)
Kamdesh (9)
Kandahar (12)
Karachi (7)
Kashmir (2)
Khost Province (1)
Khyber (11)
Knife Blogging (7)
Korea (4)
Korengal Valley (3)
Kunar Province (20)
Kurdistan (3)
Language in COIN (5)
Language in Statecraft (1)
Language Interpreters (2)
Lashkar-e-Taiba (2)
Law Enforcement (6)
Lawfare (14)
Leadership (6)
Lebanon (6)
Leon Panetta (2)
Let Them Fight (2)
Libya (14)
Lines of Effort (3)
Littoral Combat (8)
Logistics (50)
Long Guns (1)
Lt. Col. Allen West (2)
Marine Corps (280)
Marines in Bakwa (1)
Marines in Helmand (67)
Marjah (4)
MEDEVAC (2)
Media (68)
Medical (146)
Memorial Day (6)
Mexican Cartels (42)
Mexico (63)
Michael Yon (6)
Micromanaging the Military (7)
Middle East (1)
Military Blogging (26)
Military Contractors (5)
Military Equipment (25)
Militia (9)
Mitt Romney (3)
Monetary Policy (1)
Moqtada al Sadr (2)
Mosul (4)
Mountains (25)
MRAPs (1)
Mullah Baradar (1)
Mullah Fazlullah (1)
Mullah Omar (3)
Musa Qala (4)
Music (25)
Muslim Brotherhood (6)
Nation Building (2)
National Internet IDs (1)
National Rifle Association (97)
NATO (15)
Navy (30)
Navy Corpsman (1)
NCOs (3)
News (1)
NGOs (3)
Nicholas Schmidle (2)
Now Zad (19)
NSA (3)
NSA James L. Jones (6)
Nuclear (63)
Nuristan (8)
Obama Administration (221)
Offshore Balancing (1)
Operation Alljah (7)
Operation Khanjar (14)
Ossetia (7)
Pakistan (165)
Paktya Province (1)
Palestine (5)
Patriotism (7)
Patrolling (1)
Pech River Valley (11)
Personal (73)
Petraeus (14)
Pictures (1)
Piracy (13)
Pistol (4)
Pizzagate (21)
Police (659)
Police in COIN (3)
Policy (15)
Politics (986)
Poppy (2)
PPEs (1)
Prisons in Counterinsurgency (12)
Project Gunrunner (20)
PRTs (1)
Qatar (1)
Quadrennial Defense Review (2)
Quds Force (13)
Quetta Shura (1)
RAND (3)
Recommended Reading (14)
Refueling Tanker (1)
Religion (495)
Religion and Insurgency (19)
Reuters (1)
Rick Perry (4)
Rifles (1)
Roads (4)
Rolling Stone (1)
Ron Paul (1)
ROTC (1)
Rules of Engagement (75)
Rumsfeld (1)
Russia (37)
Sabbatical (1)
Sangin (1)
Saqlawiyah (1)
Satellite Patrols (2)
Saudi Arabia (4)
Scenes from Iraq (1)
Second Amendment (687)
Second Amendment Quick Hits (2)
Secretary Gates (9)
Sharia Law (3)
Shura Ittehad-ul-Mujahiden (1)
SIIC (2)
Sirajuddin Haqqani (1)
Small Wars (72)
Snipers (9)
Sniveling Lackeys (2)
Soft Power (4)
Somalia (8)
Sons of Afghanistan (1)
Sons of Iraq (2)
Special Forces (28)
Squad Rushes (1)
State Department (23)
Statistics (1)
Sunni Insurgency (10)
Support to Infantry Ratio (1)
Supreme Court (63)
Survival (205)
SWAT Raids (57)
Syria (38)
Tactical Drills (38)
Tactical Gear (15)
Taliban (168)
Taliban Massing of Forces (4)
Tarmiyah (1)
TBI (1)
Technology (21)
Tehrik-i-Taliban (78)
Terrain in Combat (1)
Terrorism (96)
Thanksgiving (13)
The Anbar Narrative (23)
The Art of War (5)
The Fallen (1)
The Long War (20)
The Surge (3)
The Wounded (13)
Thomas Barnett (1)
Transnational Insurgencies (5)
Tribes (5)
TSA (25)
TSA Ineptitude (14)
TTPs (4)
U.S. Border Patrol (6)
U.S. Border Security (19)
U.S. Sovereignty (24)
UAVs (2)
UBL (4)
Ukraine (10)
Uncategorized (100)
Universal Background Check (3)
Unrestricted Warfare (4)
USS Iwo Jima (2)
USS San Antonio (1)
Uzbekistan (1)
V-22 Osprey (4)
Veterans (3)
Vietnam (1)
War & Warfare (419)
War & Warfare (41)
War Movies (4)
War Reporting (21)
Wardak Province (1)
Warriors (6)
Waziristan (1)
Weapons and Tactics (79)
West Point (1)
Winter Operations (1)
Women in Combat (21)
WTF? (1)
Yemen (1)

December 2024
November 2024
October 2024
September 2024
August 2024
July 2024
June 2024
May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006

about · archives · contact · register

Copyright © 2006-2024 Captain's Journal. All rights reserved.