“Inadvertent oversight” means Indiana deer hunters can’t use rifles on public land
BY Herschel Smith2 years ago
A state lawmaker is now admitting a mistake was made that has led to a lot of confusion and anger from Indiana deer hunters. New regulations prohibit hunters from using any kind of rifle to hunt deer on public property, like state parks. But the author of the bill that caused this said that was never the intention.
Republican State Representative Sean Eberhart (Shelbyville) authored House Bill 1415, which is at the heart of the confusion.
“First of all, it was something that nobody caught when the bill was first passed,” said Eberhart.
In 2016, rifles could be used on public land only when they shot pistol rounds, but high velocity ammunition could be used on private property. This year, lawmakers changed the existing law to clarify the rules regarding high velocity rounds.
I think that’s an error in the article. Rather than “pistol” cartridges, I think it should have read “straight wall” cartridges, which would include 350 Legend (Indiana was one of the reasons the cartridge was designed to begin with), 45-70, etc. But I’ll let an Indiana reader clarify this.
“The intent of the change was to make it more clear on what high velocity rifle rounds you could use on private property,” said Eberhart, “when that change was made, it inadvertently pulled in the pistol rounds as well [and] unfortunately the law now says that you can use those high velocity and pistol rounds in a rifle, but only on private grounds.”
That oversight has left deer hunters unhappy. Many outfitters and gun stores we spoke to on the phone said they’re getting calls from angry and confused hunters.
When questioned how neither he nor any of the law co-signers caught the oversight before it was voted on, Eberhart responded, “That’s a good question, not only did we not catch it as myself or any other legislator, LSA didn’t catch it, no other department didn’t catch it, DNR didn’t catch it, so we had a lot of eyes on this bill and no one caught that inadvertent change.”
In light of that, Eberhart hopes to fix the problem soon.
“I’m very confident we can address it come session time in January…but it’s my hope that we can address it short term as well,” said Eberhart.
What that short term fix could be and whether it can happen fast enough for this season, which starts November 18th, isn’t clear. But Eberhart reiterated that he and his fellow lawmakers are working on a solution.
Yes, this article is dated and I missed it when it came out, but after a brief search I haven’t been able to find any amelioration of this stupidity.
I’m also not convinced that this is an error or oversight. The simplest thing to do here to remove the ban on all cartridges and let hunters shoot what they want, thus ensuring ethical harvesting.
Indiana’s hunting lands are far more expansive than where I live, and we don’t shoot centerfire cartridges into homes around here. The alleged concern is a sham.
On December 11, 2022 at 9:17 pm, Heywood said:
Even the lawmaker is quoted speaking about “pistol” rounds. His whole explanation was, to quote Elon Musk, “unconvincing.” I think the main problem is we have idiots writing laws about subjects (in addition to almost every gun law) of which they are completely ignorant.
On December 11, 2022 at 9:39 pm, Frank Clarke said:
@Heywood nailed it in just three words: “idiots writing laws”.
On December 12, 2022 at 6:14 am, Joe Blow said:
Well when you have to pass a law to see whats in it….
Hang em, hang em all, from very tall trees with short lengths of rope.
On December 12, 2022 at 8:00 pm, X said:
The article’s FIVE YEARS old.
Is this still an issue?