450 SMC: The 10mm Killer
BY Herschel Smithdata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bb8c7/bb8c79357724292758ba28352f4cab5ee80431aa" alt=""
Well, maybe it’s not quite the 10mm killer, since they’re about equal in energy delivered to target (based purely on computations, absent a gel test). But in this article I hope to explain what the 450 SMC is and why I choose to carry it for dangerous game.
I’ve written about the 450 SMC before about five years ago and also here (that’s how long I’ve been shooting it). There’s a Wikipedia page on the .45 Super, but not the 450 SMC. The 450 SMC is loaded hotter than the .45 Super and thus has a higher muzzle velocity. I will comment that the first time I shot this load, I put two rounds within a couple of inches at 30 feet in less than one second.
For the .45 Super, Wikipedia tells us that “The layout of most M1911 pistols’ chambers presents yet another challenge in that the case head is not fully supported in the cartridge feed ramp area; pushing the envelope in this critical area with too much pressure risks a catastrophic failure, resulting in a case bursting in the chamber. To rule out such a dangerous possibility, Grennell chose to use brass formed from the stronger and more modern .451 Detonics, shortened to the overall length of the .45 ACP design.”
The 450 SMC isn’t too different in design philosophy, in that it uses a thicker case.
The good folks over at Double Tap are always pushing the envelope on power. They might have out-done themselves with the new 450 SMC. This new round is meant to be fired through any firearm that is chambered for 45 ACP +P. It pushes a 185 gr JHP to 1350 fps, a 230 gr JHP to 1200 and a 255 gr hardcast to 1100.
Did you catch that? It came pretty fast. A 185 grain jacketed hollow point, from a 1911, running at 1,350 feet per second. For those of you keeping score at home, that is fast.
How can they do this in a chamber designed for 45 ACP you ask? They use a special cartridge case. The case is essentially a cut down .308. This gives it thicker walls to hold up to the charge.
At the moment Double Tap are the only folks who offer this cartridge. Neither the 450 SMC nor the .45 Super are SAAMI spec cartridges. In order to push the bullets so fast, the primer is changed over from a typical pistol primer to a rifle primer, leaving more room in the case for powder. So the advertised muzzle velocity of the 450 SMC for a 230 grain bullet is 1130 FPS. But also at the moment, Double Tap doesn’t have what I carry for dangerous game in stock, i.e., jacketed flat nose. In my experience they make several runs of this ammunition every year, so you have to watch for it to come in stock.
American Hunter has a nice featured article on the history of the 450 SMC.
Among the best-known and longest-serving military and civilian defensive pistol calibers in the United States is the .45 ACP. Many enthusiasts still praise this member of John Moses Browning’s Automatic Colt Pistol (ACP) cartridge family, which was developed in 1905. It was eventually paired with Browning’s 1911A1 semi-automatic pistol to form one of the most successful gun and ammunition combinations in this country’s shooting-sports history.
But when it comes to more recent online conversations regarding defensive handguns for use on the trail, the .45 ACP often gets short shrift. Polymer-framed 10mm Auto pistols are taking up more holster space in bear country these days. So much so, that even long-time trail-gun favorites, including double-action revolvers chambered in .357 Magnum and .44 Magnum, are taking a back seat.
But despite the 10mm Auto’s popularity, I was not quite ready to write off the .45 ACP cartridge, and the many popular pistols chambered in it, as trail gun options just yet. Recently I found myself in possession of a pair of Taurus TH series pistols, one chambered in .45 ACP and the other in 10mm Auto. I did my best to line up comparable loads in both calibers and shot them side-by-side to compare the performance numbers. But it came as no surprise that even when using +P-rated .45 ACP ammunition, the 10mm was the superior performer.
As an editorial remark, I wouldn’t ever brush aside the 45 ACP as a dangerous game cartridge, and I especially wouldn’t brush aside the .44 magnum. But more on that later. For jacketed ball .45 ACP, I have found that Browning has some they claim will achieve nearly 1000 FPS. I would never carry hollow point for dangerous game defense.
Simply stated, the 10mm Auto can hit harder than a .45 ACP. This is due in no small part to differences in cartridge case pressure tolerance levels. Remember, the 10mm Auto, as envisioned by Colonel Jeff Cooper, was developed to stretch the 1911 pistol’s effective range out to 50-yards. This was done by launching .40-caliber bullets from cartridges operating at a maximum average pressure (MAP) of 37,500 psi. Standard pressure .45 ACP ammunition operates at a maximum of 21,000 psi with the +P loads topping out at 23,000 psi. No matter how you slice it, the 10mm Auto cartridge has the bullet energy potential edge for semi-automatic pistols. Or does it?
Efforts to develop a more powerful, but still .45 ACP-compatible, pistol cartridge can be traced back to the mid 1980s. Gun writer Dean Grennell took the .451 Detonics Magnum cartridge case (which in turn is based on the .45 Winchester Magnum case) and trimmed the length down to match that of the .45 ACP. Operating at up to 28,000 psi, early loads were capable of launching 185-grain bullets at 1,300 fps. which represented an impressive boost in performance. Working in conjunction with Ace Hindman of Ace Custom 45s, the .45 Super cartridge was born.
Unfortunately, the .45 Super would become encumbered by an unusual business choice made by the late Ace Hindman’s son, Garey Hindman. He trademarked the cartridge name “.45 Super.” This meant that any cartridge case, ammunition or firearm manufacturer who stamped .45 Super on their products would have to pay royalties to Hindman. Even though he kept the offering alive, none of the big players in the industry would promote the cartridge which, in turn, resulted in no reliable source for .45 Super brass.
In 1994 the owner of Triton Cartridge, Fernando Coelho, reached out to Garey Hindman to offer his services on behalf of the .45 Super. However, Coelho ran into issues which inspired him to develop his own potent .45 ACP pistol-compatible cartridge starting in 2001. It was dubbed the .450 SMC (Short Magnum Cartridge) so as to not be bound by the .45 Super trademark. Coelho would also modify his cartridge to use a small rifle primer in place of a large pistol primer. This solved the problem of primer flow (the primer flattening out when fired) and made room for additional metal to reinforce the cartridge base.
Triton Cartridge soon began shipping factory-made .450 SMC rounds loaded to 32,000 psi. Although this is not as high of a pressure potential as the 10 mm Auto (37,500 psi), it launches larger bullets. This levels the playing field, especially when compared to standard .45 ACP, .45 ACP +P and .45 Super bullet energy levels. But the .450 SMC would run into some setbacks of its own.
In 2003, Triton Cartridge went out of business. As a result, it looked like this souped-up .45-caliber pistol round was going to slip into obscurity along with it. However, Mike McNett, founder of DoubleTap Ammunition, would swoop in to save the day. In business since 2002, McNett had launched DoubleTap by offering full-power 10mm Auto loads not available from other manufacturers at that time. Recognizing the .450 SMC’s potential, he purchased the rights and tooling to the cartridge and spent a few years tweaking it to get it just right before adding it to the company’s now expansive catalog of pistol and rifle calibers.
Today DoubleTap offers six different loads topped with bullet weighing between 160-grains to 255-grains, with bullet styles including jacketed hollow points, full-metal jacket and hard-cast lead flat nose. Although DoubleTap has offered .450 SMC for some time, it has yet to be officially recognized by the Sporting Arms and Ammunition Manufacturers’ Institute (SAAMI), and thus remains a wildcat cartridge. This ‘unofficial’ cartridge status, along with the lack of pistols built specifically for this round, keeps the .450 SMC flying relatively low on the trail-gun caliber scene.
I’ve mentioned before that I carry my 450 SMC in a modified 1911. The modification is simple. I replaced the 18# recoil spring with a 22# recoil spring from Wolff Gunsprings. American Hunter does bring up the need to pay attention to the spring.
DoubleTap maintains in their literature that the .450 SMC cartridge can be safely fired in any .45 ACP pistol, revolver or carbine which is rated for .45 ACP +P ammunition, no modifications required. Although this statement is technically correct, it’s also incomplete. If you spend any time researching the .45 Super or similar cartridges, the one thing that gets mentioned time and again is the benefit of using a heavier recoil spring weight.
There is much more about the testing at American Hunter. But the money is here in the table of results.
And then finally, in this table.
It’s just not true that 10mm is a better option than 45, if you assume that the ammunition of choice is 450 SMC.
There are handguns that will shoot 450 SMC which are larger frame polymer pistols if that’s your choice, but I choose to use a 1911. This is for several reasons. My arthritis has swollen the knuckles on my right hand almost beyond recognition (I can still pull a trigger with ease), but I like the 1911 for its narrow frame. Also, I don’t shoot striker-fired handguns. I only have hammer fired handguns, and I very much like the tactile trigger.
As for magazine capacity, it’s true that the most you will find with the usual 1911 magazines is eight rounds (or maybe seven). But if you desire, both Wilson Combat and Chip McCormick sell 10-round magazines (although they’re slightly longer). The single stack design doesn’t bother me – again, I like it and choose to shoot the 1911 exactly for this reason.
Shooting Illustrated claims that the 450 SMC generates 78% more recoil than the .45 ACP. As I’ve said, I cannot confirm that from shooting the cartridge, although I’ve never measured it. My experience with the cartridge just doesn’t bear that out. I find it about as easy to shoot as .45 ACP.
If you want more, there’s always the .44 magnum in a wheel gun, or for semi-auto design, you can do a conversion to 460 Rowland. I have hiked out West and carried a .44 magnum and a 1911 with 450 SMC. I’ve never felt under-gunned with either firearm, although if I spent more time out West, I would probably lean towards the .44 magnum.
In the East, for dangerous game defense, we would primarily face black bear, Coyotes and feral hogs (if they’re “runners” they turn and try to get away – though I’ve seen the opposite before, and with the tusks the males sport, your femoral artery is in danger). For the West, brown and grizzly bears are a different story. For the record, while in Colorado, according to conversations with folks who had been where I was headed, Moose were the most dangerous threat (they will stomp you). Without any hesitation, I carried the 450 SMC and never felt vulnerable.
In the end what you carry is up to you. But don’t believe the hype that the only choice in a semiautomatic handgun is the 10mm. That cartridge is a viable choice, but it’s not the only one. There is 450 SMC, and then there is 460 Rowland for a slight step up. I’ve carried 450 SMC hiking in dangerous game territory, and may carry it while hunting, but for hunting it depends on how accessible I intend to keep my rifle. If my hunting is near a deer stand, I may carry a smaller caliber.
On February 16, 2025 at 8:27 pm, Georgiaboy61 said:
The 450 SMC looks like a very capable cartridge. The desirability of using a stouter recoil spring is mentioned, but what about getting stiffer and faster magazine springs? Did this prove to be necessary? I know that in the 460 Rowland conversion, stiffer and faster mag springs are needed so that the slide velocity doesn’t out-run the ability of the magazine spring to get the top cartridge into place at the right time.
FYI, Starline Brass makes 460 Rowland brass factory new; it is built to withstand the pressures of that cartridge, and would probably work for 450 SMC. Come to think of it, I believe Starline also makes 450 SMC. Anyway, check them out if need be….
Herschel, your points in favor of the M1911 resonate with me. I am not as against striker-fired handguns as you are – but I do come back to John Browning’s timeless design as being my ideal in a handgun. And given a choice between a striker-fired HG and one using a hammer, these days I am apt to pick the latter.
Thanks for the article…
On February 17, 2025 at 8:21 am, Latigo Morgan said:
Out on the ranch, a seen coyote is a dead coyote. Years ago, we found we missed a lot of opportunities with a rifle, just because it was slower to get it out of the truck and into play. We carried 1911’s and one guy had a Glock, and got pretty good at hitting a running song dog with the pistols. But, we didn’t get them all. So, a friend of mine came up with a quicker load – a 185 gr. XTP at just over 1,000 fps. It made a huge difference for us. A running coyote hit with one of these will turn ass over teakettle. It got to be a bit of a contest as to who could get the most flips out of one.
I’m not out on the ranch anymore, and when I see a coyote run across the road in front of me, I start vibrating, but I reckon the neighbors would get upset if I started shooting – even though they have all lost cats, dogs, and chickens to them. I still carry some of those 185’s around with me for my 1911 – just in case.
But, I sure like that 450 SMC. If I can find some loading data for it, I’ll get some brass and a recoil spring and put some together for myself. Out in the mountains, my preferred sidearm is a .44 mag in a flap holster on my hip. I haven’t run into any moose yet, but they are migrating this direction. A couple have been seen in New Mexico with one having been reported as far south as Santa Fe, until some poachers got him near Espanola.
On February 17, 2025 at 9:01 am, John said:
What about using 45 SMC in a S&W 625 45 ACP moon clip wheel gun?
On February 17, 2025 at 11:34 am, Herschel Smith said:
@Georgiaboy61,
Great question. I haven’t had any problems with the 22# spring cycling the slide before the mag spring puts another round in. YMMV.
@ John,
Whew. Great question. I called S&W customer service, and it was pretty worthless to be quite honest. They said, “We recommend only firing ammunition the firearm is marked for.” Of course.
So the answer is, IDK.
On February 17, 2025 at 1:07 pm, Phillip Bromley said:
So one thing I’m missing is, what does this cartridge do that .460 Rowland doesn’t do better? The .460 Rowland sends a 255gr at 1500FPS. Quite literally .44 Magnum energies in a 1911 sized gun.
On February 17, 2025 at 1:16 pm, Herschel Smith said:
@Phillip,
I’m not claiming that this cartridge does anything better than 460 Rowland. The Rowland is yet another purchase while this is an easy and inexpensive conversion. In fact, I have found that the 22# spring doesn’t interfere with the use of 45 ACP in the gun (I assume, as long as I don’t use cheap ammo that will generate MV on the low end).
On February 17, 2025 at 2:18 pm, Bones said:
Thanks for this. I have been working up .451 Detonics Magnum loads for my Detonics Scoremaster using 460 Rowland cases trimmed down. I might have to look into the 45 SMC.
I passed on the 460 Rowland because of the necessity of a compensator or long slide mod.
On February 17, 2025 at 2:19 pm, Georgiaboy61 said:
@P.B.
Re: “So one thing I’m missing is, what does this cartridge do that .460 Rowland doesn’t do better?”
As an owner of a 460 Rowland conversion, I can still see the appeal of having a M1911 set-up for 450 SMC. Here’s why…
The 460R conversion is more-expensive than 450 SMC, and requires that one have a muzzle compensator installed, which is necessary so that the action cycles properly. The “4600 Rowland” website explains the physics behind it if you wish to know more. Since the handgun is now longer and bulkier, it no longer fits many holsters designed for 1911-style handguns.
The conversion only works – and is only done by their shop – on handguns rated for the higher chamber pressure. Which in turn means choosing from the list on their website, or perhaps getting an after-market barrel for your handgun, depending on your situation.
If you choose to do the 460 Rowland conversion, you’ll need to have faster, stiffer mag springs installed in some of your magazines. Any handgun so modified can still utilize standard 45 Auto/ACP ammo but they advise leaving some magazines in standard/OEM form for this purpose.
You end up with two sets of mags. If you mark them, no big deal – but some may not want the inconvenience.
I have not shot a handgun configured for 450 SMC, but I have used 10mm Auto and 460 Rowland. The Rowland is a powerhouse; very capable but it isn’t for everyone. I had an FN FNX 45 done. It is a large, bulky, somewhat heavy handgun. The ergonomics are good, and it shoots well – but it is a handful. I imagine that the 450 SMC is an easier, more-pleasant handgun to use – but still plenty powerful.
The muzzle device from the conversion precludes use of a suppressor, which may matter to some people.
I suppose it boils down to the question of “How much performance do you need?”
I wanted a semi-auto handgun without giving up too much performance to something like a 44 Magnum, specifically for use as a trail/hiking sidearm, for dangerous game/bear defense.
The hottest 460 Rowland loads fall mid-range on the power scale for 44 Magnum; it shines in terms of capacity, though. No revolver can compete with it there. And I shoot accurately with the FN FNX conversion – better than I do with a 44 Mag wheel-gun; of course YMMV.
On February 17, 2025 at 4:54 pm, Paul B said:
So, pardon my confusion. 450 SMC can be shot out a a bone stock 1911 in 45 ACP? Even if you need to change out the recoils spring that would be a good thing. I have 5 1911’s so one could be reconfigured pretty easy.
On February 17, 2025 at 5:21 pm, Herschel Smith said:
@Paul,
That’s what I do, so yes.
I don’t feed that particular gun a steady diet of 450 SMC (it’s too expensive anyway). I practice just a bit with it before carrying it out.
If you used it a lot at the range and fed it a steady diet of 450 SMC, I suspect there would be parts wear issues that exceeded what you would get with 45 ACP, mostly associated with recoil.
On February 17, 2025 at 9:00 pm, Dan said:
Ammo availability is an issue. 10mm is relatively easy to find. 45 Super/45 SMC is difficult…at best…to find. And 10mm is going to be cheaper. Other than that there’s nothing wrong with either of these offerings.
On February 18, 2025 at 12:28 am, Georgiaboy61 said:
@ Paul B.
Re: “So, pardon my confusion. 450 SMC can be shot out a a bone stock 1911 in 45 ACP? Even if you need to change out the recoils spring that would be a good thing.”
Yes, that’s right. If you want to do a 450 SMC conversion, all you’d need to do is to swap out your recoil spring for a suitable heavier one. As our host has indicated, you needn’t do a swap in your mag springs. If you own multiple M19011-style handguns, then choose one which is rated to high pressure loads, preferably one in which the case is “fully supported” or enclosed. If you are uncertain about which models would work, you can always contact the manufacturer.
The dilemma is that the venerable 45 Auto/ACP cartridge was designed to operate at pretty modest pressures on the order of 16000-18000 psi. SAAMI sets their limit at 21,000 psi, while their European counterpart CIP sets theirs at 19,000. Modern hot-rodded cartridge designs can as much as double these pressures or more, so you see what is at stake.
And if you don’t see what you need, there is always a drop-in after-market barrel/chamber rated for higher than stock/OEM pressures.
On February 18, 2025 at 5:32 pm, Brutus said:
There’s also a nice data set for 45 super at http://ballisticsbytheinch.com/45super.html .
On February 18, 2025 at 10:33 pm, Paul B said:
Thanks for the input. My 45 are two rugers, two Remingtons, the newest one is one a big box had for sale. Would have to look and see what it is. I also have an H&K 45 which might be the best choice over all. It is not a 1911. I looked at the results @Brutus had but the went after rifles and (spit) glocks.
On February 18, 2025 at 10:37 pm, Latigo Morgan said:
I found some guys on a forum saying they are using Federal .45 ACP +P small primer brass to load up 450 SMC using small rifle primers. This might work out for me. Just need to figure out a workable powder charge.
On February 19, 2025 at 11:33 am, xtphreak said:
Herschel
I’m confused by your statement “…In order to push the bullets so fast, the primer is changed over from a typical pistol primer to a rifle primer, leaving more room in the case for powder.”.
Since a large rifle primer is taller, (0.1230″ – 0.1360″) and the pocket is deeper (0.1250″ – 0.1320″) than either a small rifle/small pistol/large pistol (0.1150″ – 0.1260″ height) & (0.1170″ – 0.1230″ depth), it isn’t clear to me where this extra case capacity comes from?
Dimensions source: https://ballistictools.com/articles/primer-pocket-depth-and-diameter.php#:~:text=Table_content:%20header:%20%7C%20Primer%20Type%20%7C%20Height,Min:%200.1150%20%7C%20Height%20Max:%200.1260%20%7C
Havea Good Day