450 SMC: The 10mm Killer

BY Herschel Smith
3 days, 2 hours ago

Well, maybe it’s not quite the 10mm killer, since they’re about equal in energy delivered to target (based purely on computations, absent a gel test). But in this article I hope to explain what the 450 SMC is and why I choose to carry it for dangerous game.

I’ve written about the 450 SMC before about five years ago and also here (that’s how long I’ve been shooting it). There’s a Wikipedia page on the .45 Super, but not the 450 SMC. The 450 SMC is loaded hotter than the .45 Super and thus has a higher muzzle velocity. I will comment that the first time I shot this load, I put two rounds within a couple of inches at 30 feet in less than one second.

For the .45 Super, Wikipedia tells us that “The layout of most M1911 pistols’ chambers presents yet another challenge in that the case head is not fully supported in the cartridge feed ramp area; pushing the envelope in this critical area with too much pressure risks a catastrophic failure, resulting in a case bursting in the chamber. To rule out such a dangerous possibility, Grennell chose to use brass formed from the stronger and more modern .451 Detonics, shortened to the overall length of the .45 ACP design.”

The 450 SMC isn’t too different in design philosophy, in that it uses a thicker case.

The good folks over at Double Tap are always pushing the envelope on power. They might have out-done themselves with the new 450 SMC. This new round is meant to be fired through any firearm that is chambered for 45 ACP +P. It pushes a 185 gr JHP to 1350 fps, a 230 gr JHP to 1200 and a 255 gr hardcast to 1100.

Did you catch that? It came pretty fast. A 185 grain jacketed hollow point, from a 1911, running at 1,350 feet per second. For those of you keeping score at home, that is fast.

How can they do this in a chamber designed for 45 ACP you ask? They use a special cartridge case. The case is essentially a cut down .308. This gives it thicker walls to hold up to the charge.

At the moment Double Tap are the only folks who offer this cartridge. Neither the 450 SMC nor the .45 Super are SAAMI spec cartridges. In order to push the bullets so fast, the primer is changed over from a typical pistol primer to a rifle primer, leaving more room in the case for powder. So the advertised muzzle velocity of the 450 SMC for a 230 grain bullet is 1130 FPS. But also at the moment, Double Tap doesn’t have what I carry for dangerous game in stock, i.e., jacketed flat nose. In my experience they make several runs of this ammunition every year, so you have to watch for it to come in stock.

American Hunter has a nice featured article on the history of the 450 SMC.

Among the best-known and longest-serving military and civilian defensive pistol calibers in the United States is the .45 ACP. Many enthusiasts still praise this member of John Moses Browning’s Automatic Colt Pistol (ACP) cartridge family, which was developed in 1905. It was eventually paired with Browning’s 1911A1 semi-automatic pistol to form one of the most successful gun and ammunition combinations in this country’s shooting-sports history.

But when it comes to more recent online conversations regarding defensive handguns for use on the trail, the .45 ACP often gets short shrift. Polymer-framed 10mm Auto pistols are taking up more holster space in bear country these days. So much so, that even long-time trail-gun favorites, including double-action revolvers chambered in .357 Magnum and .44 Magnum, are taking a back seat.

But despite the 10mm Auto’s popularity, I was not quite ready to write off the .45 ACP cartridge, and the many popular pistols chambered in it, as trail gun options just yet. Recently I found myself in possession of a pair of Taurus TH series pistols, one chambered in .45 ACP and the other in 10mm Auto. I did my best to line up comparable loads in both calibers and shot them side-by-side to compare the performance numbers. But it came as no surprise that even when using +P-rated .45 ACP ammunition, the 10mm was the superior performer.

As an editorial remark, I wouldn’t ever brush aside the 45 ACP as a dangerous game cartridge, and I especially wouldn’t brush aside the .44 magnum. But more on that later. For jacketed ball .45 ACP, I have found that Browning has some they claim will achieve nearly 1000 FPS. I would never carry hollow point for dangerous game defense.

Simply stated, the 10mm Auto can hit harder than a .45 ACP. This is due in no small part to differences in cartridge case pressure tolerance levels. Remember, the 10mm Auto, as envisioned by Colonel Jeff Cooper, was developed to stretch the 1911 pistol’s effective range out to 50-yards. This was done by launching .40-caliber bullets from cartridges operating at a maximum average pressure (MAP) of 37,500 psi. Standard pressure .45 ACP ammunition operates at a maximum of 21,000 psi with the +P loads topping out at 23,000 psi. No matter how you slice it, the 10mm Auto cartridge has the bullet energy potential edge for semi-automatic pistols. Or does it?

Efforts to develop a more powerful, but still .45 ACP-compatible, pistol cartridge can be traced back to the mid 1980s. Gun writer Dean Grennell took the .451 Detonics Magnum cartridge case (which in turn is based on the .45 Winchester Magnum case) and trimmed the length down to match that of the .45 ACP. Operating at up to 28,000 psi, early loads were capable of launching 185-grain bullets at 1,300 fps. which represented an impressive boost in performance. Working in conjunction with Ace Hindman of Ace Custom 45s, the .45 Super cartridge was born.

Unfortunately, the .45 Super would become encumbered by an unusual business choice made by the late Ace Hindman’s son, Garey Hindman. He trademarked the cartridge name “.45 Super.” This meant that any cartridge case, ammunition or firearm manufacturer who stamped .45 Super on their products would have to pay royalties to Hindman. Even though he kept the offering alive, none of the big players in the industry would promote the cartridge which, in turn, resulted in no reliable source for .45 Super brass.

In 1994 the owner of Triton Cartridge, Fernando Coelho, reached out to Garey Hindman to offer his services on behalf of the .45 Super. However, Coelho ran into issues which inspired him to develop his own potent .45 ACP pistol-compatible cartridge starting in 2001. It was dubbed the .450 SMC (Short Magnum Cartridge) so as to not be bound by the .45 Super trademark. Coelho would also modify his cartridge to use a small rifle primer in place of a large pistol primer. This solved the problem of primer flow (the primer flattening out when fired) and made room for additional metal to reinforce the cartridge base.

Triton Cartridge soon began shipping factory-made .450 SMC rounds loaded to 32,000 psi. Although this is not as high of a pressure potential as the 10 mm Auto (37,500 psi), it launches larger bullets. This levels the playing field, especially when compared to standard .45 ACP, .45 ACP +P and .45 Super bullet energy levels. But the .450 SMC would run into some setbacks of its own.

In 2003, Triton Cartridge went out of business. As a result, it looked like this souped-up .45-caliber pistol round was going to slip into obscurity along with it. However, Mike McNett, founder of DoubleTap Ammunition, would swoop in to save the day. In business since 2002, McNett had launched DoubleTap by offering full-power 10mm Auto loads not available from other manufacturers at that time. Recognizing the .450 SMC’s potential, he purchased the rights and tooling to the cartridge and spent a few years tweaking it to get it just right before adding it to the company’s now expansive catalog of pistol and rifle calibers.

Today DoubleTap offers six different loads topped with bullet weighing between 160-grains to 255-grains, with bullet styles including jacketed hollow points, full-metal jacket and hard-cast lead flat nose. Although DoubleTap has offered .450 SMC for some time, it has yet to be officially recognized by the Sporting Arms and Ammunition Manufacturers’ Institute (SAAMI), and thus remains a wildcat cartridge. This ‘unofficial’ cartridge status, along with the lack of pistols built specifically for this round, keeps the .450 SMC flying relatively low on the trail-gun caliber scene.

I’ve mentioned before that I carry my 450 SMC in a modified 1911. The modification is simple. I replaced the 18# recoil spring with a 22# recoil spring from Wolff Gunsprings. American Hunter does bring up the need to pay attention to the spring.

DoubleTap maintains in their literature that the .450 SMC cartridge can be safely fired in any .45 ACP pistol, revolver or carbine which is rated for .45 ACP +P ammunition, no modifications required. Although this statement is technically correct, it’s also incomplete. If you spend any time researching the .45 Super or similar cartridges, the one thing that gets mentioned time and again is the benefit of using a heavier recoil spring weight.

There is much more about the testing at American Hunter. But the money is here in the table of results.

G21 shooting results

And then finally, in this table.

Table 2

It’s just not true that 10mm is a better option than 45, if you assume that the ammunition of choice is 450 SMC.

There are handguns that will shoot 450 SMC which are larger frame polymer pistols if that’s your choice, but I choose to use a 1911. This is for several reasons. My arthritis has swollen the knuckles on my right hand almost beyond recognition (I can still pull a trigger with ease), but I like the 1911 for its narrow frame. Also, I don’t shoot striker-fired handguns. I only have hammer fired handguns, and I very much like the tactile trigger.

As for magazine capacity, it’s true that the most you will find with the usual 1911 magazines is eight rounds (or maybe seven). But if you desire, both Wilson Combat and Chip McCormick sell 10-round magazines (although they’re slightly longer). The single stack design doesn’t bother me – again, I like it and choose to shoot the 1911 exactly for this reason.

Shooting Illustrated claims that the 450 SMC generates 78% more recoil than the .45 ACP. As I’ve said, I cannot confirm that from shooting the cartridge, although I’ve never measured it. My experience with the cartridge just doesn’t bear that out. I find it about as easy to shoot as .45 ACP.

If you want more, there’s always the .44 magnum in a wheel gun, or for semi-auto design, you can do a conversion to 460 Rowland. I have hiked out West and carried a .44 magnum and a 1911 with 450 SMC. I’ve never felt under-gunned with either firearm, although if I spent more time out West, I would probably lean towards the .44 magnum.

In the East, for dangerous game defense, we would primarily face black bear, Coyotes and feral hogs (if they’re “runners” they turn and try to get away – though I’ve seen the opposite before, and with the tusks the males sport, your femoral artery is in danger). For the West, brown and grizzly bears are a different story. For the record, while in Colorado, according to conversations with folks who had been where I was headed, Moose were the most dangerous threat (they will stomp you). Without any hesitation, I carried the 450 SMC and never felt vulnerable.

In the end what you carry is up to you. But don’t believe the hype that the only choice in a semiautomatic handgun is the 10mm. That cartridge is a viable choice, but it’s not the only one. There is 450 SMC, and then there is 460 Rowland for a slight step up. I’ve carried 450 SMC hiking in dangerous game territory, and may carry it while hunting, but for hunting it depends on how accessible I intend to keep my rifle. If my hunting is near a deer stand, I may carry a smaller caliber.


Comments

  1. On February 16, 2025 at 8:27 pm, Georgiaboy61 said:

    The 450 SMC looks like a very capable cartridge. The desirability of using a stouter recoil spring is mentioned, but what about getting stiffer and faster magazine springs? Did this prove to be necessary? I know that in the 460 Rowland conversion, stiffer and faster mag springs are needed so that the slide velocity doesn’t out-run the ability of the magazine spring to get the top cartridge into place at the right time.

    FYI, Starline Brass makes 460 Rowland brass factory new; it is built to withstand the pressures of that cartridge, and would probably work for 450 SMC. Come to think of it, I believe Starline also makes 450 SMC. Anyway, check them out if need be….

    Herschel, your points in favor of the M1911 resonate with me. I am not as against striker-fired handguns as you are – but I do come back to John Browning’s timeless design as being my ideal in a handgun. And given a choice between a striker-fired HG and one using a hammer, these days I am apt to pick the latter.

    Thanks for the article…

  2. On February 17, 2025 at 8:21 am, Latigo Morgan said:

    Out on the ranch, a seen coyote is a dead coyote. Years ago, we found we missed a lot of opportunities with a rifle, just because it was slower to get it out of the truck and into play. We carried 1911’s and one guy had a Glock, and got pretty good at hitting a running song dog with the pistols. But, we didn’t get them all. So, a friend of mine came up with a quicker load – a 185 gr. XTP at just over 1,000 fps. It made a huge difference for us. A running coyote hit with one of these will turn ass over teakettle. It got to be a bit of a contest as to who could get the most flips out of one.

    I’m not out on the ranch anymore, and when I see a coyote run across the road in front of me, I start vibrating, but I reckon the neighbors would get upset if I started shooting – even though they have all lost cats, dogs, and chickens to them. I still carry some of those 185’s around with me for my 1911 – just in case.

    But, I sure like that 450 SMC. If I can find some loading data for it, I’ll get some brass and a recoil spring and put some together for myself. Out in the mountains, my preferred sidearm is a .44 mag in a flap holster on my hip. I haven’t run into any moose yet, but they are migrating this direction. A couple have been seen in New Mexico with one having been reported as far south as Santa Fe, until some poachers got him near Espanola.

  3. On February 17, 2025 at 9:01 am, John said:

    What about using 45 SMC in a S&W 625 45 ACP moon clip wheel gun?

  4. On February 17, 2025 at 11:34 am, Herschel Smith said:

    @Georgiaboy61,

    Great question. I haven’t had any problems with the 22# spring cycling the slide before the mag spring puts another round in. YMMV.

    @ John,

    Whew. Great question. I called S&W customer service, and it was pretty worthless to be quite honest. They said, “We recommend only firing ammunition the firearm is marked for.” Of course.

    So the answer is, IDK.

  5. On February 17, 2025 at 1:07 pm, Phillip Bromley said:

    So one thing I’m missing is, what does this cartridge do that .460 Rowland doesn’t do better? The .460 Rowland sends a 255gr at 1500FPS. Quite literally .44 Magnum energies in a 1911 sized gun.

  6. On February 17, 2025 at 1:16 pm, Herschel Smith said:

    @Phillip,

    I’m not claiming that this cartridge does anything better than 460 Rowland. The Rowland is yet another purchase while this is an easy and inexpensive conversion. In fact, I have found that the 22# spring doesn’t interfere with the use of 45 ACP in the gun (I assume, as long as I don’t use cheap ammo that will generate MV on the low end).

  7. On February 17, 2025 at 2:18 pm, Bones said:

    Thanks for this. I have been working up .451 Detonics Magnum loads for my Detonics Scoremaster using 460 Rowland cases trimmed down. I might have to look into the 45 SMC.

    I passed on the 460 Rowland because of the necessity of a compensator or long slide mod.

  8. On February 17, 2025 at 2:19 pm, Georgiaboy61 said:

    @P.B.

    Re: “So one thing I’m missing is, what does this cartridge do that .460 Rowland doesn’t do better?”

    As an owner of a 460 Rowland conversion, I can still see the appeal of having a M1911 set-up for 450 SMC. Here’s why…

    The 460R conversion is more-expensive than 450 SMC, and requires that one have a muzzle compensator installed, which is necessary so that the action cycles properly. The “4600 Rowland” website explains the physics behind it if you wish to know more. Since the handgun is now longer and bulkier, it no longer fits many holsters designed for 1911-style handguns.

    The conversion only works – and is only done by their shop – on handguns rated for the higher chamber pressure. Which in turn means choosing from the list on their website, or perhaps getting an after-market barrel for your handgun, depending on your situation.

    If you choose to do the 460 Rowland conversion, you’ll need to have faster, stiffer mag springs installed in some of your magazines. Any handgun so modified can still utilize standard 45 Auto/ACP ammo but they advise leaving some magazines in standard/OEM form for this purpose.
    You end up with two sets of mags. If you mark them, no big deal – but some may not want the inconvenience.

    I have not shot a handgun configured for 450 SMC, but I have used 10mm Auto and 460 Rowland. The Rowland is a powerhouse; very capable but it isn’t for everyone. I had an FN FNX 45 done. It is a large, bulky, somewhat heavy handgun. The ergonomics are good, and it shoots well – but it is a handful. I imagine that the 450 SMC is an easier, more-pleasant handgun to use – but still plenty powerful.

    The muzzle device from the conversion precludes use of a suppressor, which may matter to some people.

    I suppose it boils down to the question of “How much performance do you need?”

    I wanted a semi-auto handgun without giving up too much performance to something like a 44 Magnum, specifically for use as a trail/hiking sidearm, for dangerous game/bear defense.
    The hottest 460 Rowland loads fall mid-range on the power scale for 44 Magnum; it shines in terms of capacity, though. No revolver can compete with it there. And I shoot accurately with the FN FNX conversion – better than I do with a 44 Mag wheel-gun; of course YMMV.

  9. On February 17, 2025 at 4:54 pm, Paul B said:

    So, pardon my confusion. 450 SMC can be shot out a a bone stock 1911 in 45 ACP? Even if you need to change out the recoils spring that would be a good thing. I have 5 1911’s so one could be reconfigured pretty easy.

  10. On February 17, 2025 at 5:21 pm, Herschel Smith said:

    @Paul,

    That’s what I do, so yes.

    I don’t feed that particular gun a steady diet of 450 SMC (it’s too expensive anyway). I practice just a bit with it before carrying it out.

    If you used it a lot at the range and fed it a steady diet of 450 SMC, I suspect there would be parts wear issues that exceeded what you would get with 45 ACP, mostly associated with recoil.

  11. On February 17, 2025 at 9:00 pm, Dan said:

    Ammo availability is an issue. 10mm is relatively easy to find. 45 Super/45 SMC is difficult…at best…to find. And 10mm is going to be cheaper. Other than that there’s nothing wrong with either of these offerings.

  12. On February 18, 2025 at 12:28 am, Georgiaboy61 said:

    @ Paul B.

    Re: “So, pardon my confusion. 450 SMC can be shot out a a bone stock 1911 in 45 ACP? Even if you need to change out the recoils spring that would be a good thing.”

    Yes, that’s right. If you want to do a 450 SMC conversion, all you’d need to do is to swap out your recoil spring for a suitable heavier one. As our host has indicated, you needn’t do a swap in your mag springs. If you own multiple M19011-style handguns, then choose one which is rated to high pressure loads, preferably one in which the case is “fully supported” or enclosed. If you are uncertain about which models would work, you can always contact the manufacturer.

    The dilemma is that the venerable 45 Auto/ACP cartridge was designed to operate at pretty modest pressures on the order of 16000-18000 psi. SAAMI sets their limit at 21,000 psi, while their European counterpart CIP sets theirs at 19,000. Modern hot-rodded cartridge designs can as much as double these pressures or more, so you see what is at stake.

    And if you don’t see what you need, there is always a drop-in after-market barrel/chamber rated for higher than stock/OEM pressures.

  13. On February 18, 2025 at 5:32 pm, Brutus said:

    There’s also a nice data set for 45 super at http://ballisticsbytheinch.com/45super.html .

  14. On February 18, 2025 at 10:33 pm, Paul B said:

    Thanks for the input. My 45 are two rugers, two Remingtons, the newest one is one a big box had for sale. Would have to look and see what it is. I also have an H&K 45 which might be the best choice over all. It is not a 1911. I looked at the results @Brutus had but the went after rifles and (spit) glocks.

  15. On February 18, 2025 at 10:37 pm, Latigo Morgan said:

    I found some guys on a forum saying they are using Federal .45 ACP +P small primer brass to load up 450 SMC using small rifle primers. This might work out for me. Just need to figure out a workable powder charge.

  16. On February 19, 2025 at 11:33 am, xtphreak said:

    Herschel

    I’m confused by your statement “…In order to push the bullets so fast, the primer is changed over from a typical pistol primer to a rifle primer, leaving more room in the case for powder.”.

    Since a large rifle primer is taller, (0.1230″ – 0.1360″) and the pocket is deeper (0.1250″ – 0.1320″) than either a small rifle/small pistol/large pistol (0.1150″ – 0.1260″ height) & (0.1170″ – 0.1230″ depth), it isn’t clear to me where this extra case capacity comes from?

    Dimensions source: https://ballistictools.com/articles/primer-pocket-depth-and-diameter.php#:~:text=Table_content:%20header:%20%7C%20Primer%20Type%20%7C%20Height,Min:%200.1150%20%7C%20Height%20Max:%200.1260%20%7C

    Havea Good Day

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Leave a comment


You are currently reading "450 SMC: The 10mm Killer", entry #37242 on The Captain's Journal.

This article is filed under the category(s) Firearms,Guns and was published February 16th, 2025 by Herschel Smith.

If you're interested in what else the The Captain's Journal has to say, you might try thumbing through the archives and visiting the main index, or; perhaps you would like to learn more about TCJ.

26th MEU (10)
Abu Muqawama (12)
ACOG (2)
ACOGs (1)
Afghan National Army (36)
Afghan National Police (17)
Afghanistan (704)
Afghanistan SOFA (4)
Agriculture in COIN (3)
AGW (1)
Air Force (40)
Air Power (10)
al Qaeda (83)
Ali al-Sistani (1)
America (22)
Ammunition (290)
Animals (297)
Ansar al Sunna (15)
Anthropology (3)
Antonin Scalia (1)
AR-15s (383)
Arghandab River Valley (1)
Arlington Cemetery (2)
Army (87)
Assassinations (2)
Assault Weapon Ban (29)
Australian Army (7)
Azerbaijan (4)
Backpacking (3)
Badr Organization (8)
Baitullah Mehsud (21)
Basra (17)
BATFE (235)
Battle of Bari Alai (2)
Battle of Wanat (18)
Battle Space Weight (3)
Bin Laden (7)
Blogroll (3)
Blogs (24)
Body Armor (23)
Books (3)
Border War (18)
Brady Campaign (1)
Britain (38)
British Army (35)
Camping (5)
Canada (17)
Castle Doctrine (1)
Caucasus (6)
CENTCOM (7)
Center For a New American Security (8)
Charity (3)
China (16)
Christmas (17)
CIA (30)
Civilian National Security Force (3)
Col. Gian Gentile (9)
Combat Outposts (3)
Combat Video (2)
Concerned Citizens (6)
Constabulary Actions (3)
Coolness Factor (3)
COP Keating (4)
Corruption in COIN (4)
Council on Foreign Relations (1)
Counterinsurgency (218)
DADT (2)
David Rohde (1)
Defense Contractors (2)
Department of Defense (213)
Department of Homeland Security (26)
Disaster Preparedness (5)
Distributed Operations (5)
Dogs (15)
Donald Trump (27)
Drone Campaign (4)
EFV (3)
Egypt (12)
El Salvador (1)
Embassy Security (1)
Enemy Spotters (1)
Expeditionary Warfare (17)
F-22 (2)
F-35 (1)
Fallujah (17)
Far East (3)
Fathers and Sons (2)
Favorite (1)
Fazlullah (3)
FBI (39)
Featured (191)
Federal Firearms Laws (18)
Financing the Taliban (2)
Firearms (1,816)
Football (1)
Force Projection (35)
Force Protection (4)
Force Transformation (1)
Foreign Policy (27)
Fukushima Reactor Accident (6)
Ganjgal (1)
Garmsir (1)
general (15)
General Amos (1)
General James Mattis (1)
General McChrystal (44)
General McKiernan (6)
General Rodriguez (3)
General Suleimani (9)
Georgia (19)
GITMO (2)
Google (1)
Gulbuddin Hekmatyar (1)
Gun Control (1,679)
Guns (2,356)
Guns In National Parks (3)
Haditha Roundup (10)
Haiti (2)
HAMAS (7)
Haqqani Network (9)
Hate Mail (8)
Hekmatyar (1)
Heroism (5)
Hezbollah (12)
High Capacity Magazines (16)
High Value Targets (9)
Homecoming (1)
Homeland Security (3)
Horses (2)
Humor (72)
Hunting (45)
ICOS (1)
IEDs (7)
Immigration (122)
India (10)
Infantry (4)
Information Warfare (4)
Infrastructure (4)
Intelligence (23)
Intelligence Bulletin (6)
Iran (171)
Iraq (379)
Iraq SOFA (23)
Islamic Facism (64)
Islamists (98)
Israel (19)
Jaish al Mahdi (21)
Jalalabad (1)
Japan (3)
Jihadists (82)
John Nagl (5)
Joint Intelligence Centers (1)
JRTN (1)
Kabul (1)
Kajaki Dam (1)
Kamdesh (9)
Kandahar (12)
Karachi (7)
Kashmir (2)
Khost Province (1)
Khyber (11)
Knife Blogging (7)
Korea (4)
Korengal Valley (3)
Kunar Province (20)
Kurdistan (3)
Language in COIN (5)
Language in Statecraft (1)
Language Interpreters (2)
Lashkar-e-Taiba (2)
Law Enforcement (6)
Lawfare (14)
Leadership (6)
Lebanon (6)
Leon Panetta (2)
Let Them Fight (2)
Libya (14)
Lines of Effort (3)
Littoral Combat (8)
Logistics (50)
Long Guns (1)
Lt. Col. Allen West (2)
Marine Corps (280)
Marines in Bakwa (1)
Marines in Helmand (67)
Marjah (4)
MEDEVAC (2)
Media (68)
Medical (146)
Memorial Day (6)
Mexican Cartels (44)
Mexico (67)
Michael Yon (6)
Micromanaging the Military (7)
Middle East (1)
Military Blogging (26)
Military Contractors (5)
Military Equipment (25)
Militia (9)
Mitt Romney (3)
Monetary Policy (1)
Moqtada al Sadr (2)
Mosul (4)
Mountains (25)
MRAPs (1)
Mullah Baradar (1)
Mullah Fazlullah (1)
Mullah Omar (3)
Musa Qala (4)
Music (25)
Muslim Brotherhood (6)
Nation Building (2)
National Internet IDs (1)
National Rifle Association (97)
NATO (15)
Navy (30)
Navy Corpsman (1)
NCOs (3)
News (1)
NGOs (3)
Nicholas Schmidle (2)
Now Zad (19)
NSA (3)
NSA James L. Jones (6)
Nuclear (63)
Nuristan (8)
Obama Administration (221)
Offshore Balancing (1)
Operation Alljah (7)
Operation Khanjar (14)
Ossetia (7)
Pakistan (165)
Paktya Province (1)
Palestine (5)
Patriotism (7)
Patrolling (1)
Pech River Valley (11)
Personal (74)
Petraeus (14)
Pictures (1)
Piracy (13)
Pistol (4)
Pizzagate (21)
Police (663)
Police in COIN (3)
Policy (15)
Politics (987)
Poppy (2)
PPEs (1)
Prisons in Counterinsurgency (12)
Project Gunrunner (20)
PRTs (1)
Qatar (1)
Quadrennial Defense Review (2)
Quds Force (13)
Quetta Shura (1)
RAND (3)
Recommended Reading (14)
Refueling Tanker (1)
Religion (496)
Religion and Insurgency (19)
Reuters (1)
Rick Perry (4)
Rifles (1)
Roads (4)
Rolling Stone (1)
Ron Paul (1)
ROTC (1)
Rules of Engagement (75)
Rumsfeld (1)
Russia (37)
Sabbatical (1)
Sangin (1)
Saqlawiyah (1)
Satellite Patrols (2)
Saudi Arabia (4)
Scenes from Iraq (1)
Second Amendment (688)
Second Amendment Quick Hits (2)
Secretary Gates (9)
Sharia Law (3)
Shura Ittehad-ul-Mujahiden (1)
SIIC (2)
Sirajuddin Haqqani (1)
Small Wars (72)
Snipers (9)
Sniveling Lackeys (2)
Soft Power (4)
Somalia (8)
Sons of Afghanistan (1)
Sons of Iraq (2)
Special Forces (28)
Squad Rushes (1)
State Department (23)
Statistics (1)
Sunni Insurgency (10)
Support to Infantry Ratio (1)
Supreme Court (64)
Survival (207)
SWAT Raids (57)
Syria (38)
Tactical Drills (38)
Tactical Gear (15)
Taliban (168)
Taliban Massing of Forces (4)
Tarmiyah (1)
TBI (1)
Technology (21)
Tehrik-i-Taliban (78)
Terrain in Combat (1)
Terrorism (96)
Thanksgiving (13)
The Anbar Narrative (23)
The Art of War (5)
The Fallen (1)
The Long War (20)
The Surge (3)
The Wounded (13)
Thomas Barnett (1)
Transnational Insurgencies (5)
Tribes (5)
TSA (25)
TSA Ineptitude (14)
TTPs (4)
U.S. Border Patrol (8)
U.S. Border Security (22)
U.S. Sovereignty (29)
UAVs (2)
UBL (4)
Ukraine (10)
Uncategorized (101)
Universal Background Check (3)
Unrestricted Warfare (4)
USS Iwo Jima (2)
USS San Antonio (1)
Uzbekistan (1)
V-22 Osprey (4)
Veterans (3)
Vietnam (1)
War & Warfare (419)
War & Warfare (41)
War Movies (4)
War Reporting (21)
Wardak Province (1)
Warriors (6)
Waziristan (1)
Weapons and Tactics (79)
West Point (1)
Winter Operations (1)
Women in Combat (21)
WTF? (1)
Yemen (1)

February 2025
January 2025
December 2024
November 2024
October 2024
September 2024
August 2024
July 2024
June 2024
May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006

about · archives · contact · register

Copyright © 2006-2025 Captain's Journal. All rights reserved.