Comments

1. On March 9, 2025 at 11:41 pm, Dan said:

   Not sure why anyone would be surprised by this. Islam and the Koran COMMANDS that it’s adherents kill or enslave EVERYONE who isn’t muslim. And unless opposed by effective physical force that is exactly what you can count on them to do.

2. On March 10, 2025 at 2:20 am, Georgiaboy61 said:

   Islam is portrayed in most mainstream media sources as one of the world’s great monotheistic religions, but decades of Cultural Marxism and educational rot and decay have buried a once widely-known truth: Islam is the oldest and most-determined enemy of the West and of what used to be known as Christendom. It is likewise the enemy of all non-Muslim civilizations and peoples.

   There have been several dozen serious attempts by Muslims to invade and conquer Europe over the last 1,400 years, and literally too many to count smaller raids, attacks and acts of jihad. The Moors invaded the Iberian peninsula in the period c. 712-720, and it took until 1492, and the reign of King Ferdinand and Queen Isabella to repel the Mohammedans from what they call “al-Andalus,” a period of nearly eight centuries. The rest of Europe was spared only because the Christian armies of King Charles “The Hammer” Martel triumphed against superior odds at the Battle of Tours in 732, a victory which most historians regard as pivotal in assuring that the West would remain Christian.

   The greatest mass murderers in history have been the soldiers of Allah, who have slain an estimated 800 million people, mostly non-Muslims (kafirs) since Mohammed rode out of the Arabia desert 1,400 years ago. That is the estimate reached by esteemed historians Will and Ariel Durant in their multipart “The Story of Civilization.”

   The largest single act of genocide was also committed by the sons of Allah. During the mid-1500s under the Mughal empire’s conquest of the Indian subcontinent, an estimated fifty million Hindus and other infidels were slain over a period of years – the largest act of mass murder in human history.

   The Muslims complete this trifecta of violence by being the most-prolific slavers in history. By a wide margin, the Muslim world has been responsible for more slavery and human bondage than any other in human history. Muslims have not only been the most-prolific takers and owners of slaves in history, they have also been the most-prolific traders.

   How deeply is slavery embedded in the Islamic world? Most westerners are utterly unaware of the fact that slavery is still widely practiced across the Islamic world, and that it is only in the 21st century that the last holdouts in which the practice was legal have finally passed laws making slavery illegal. Muritania, Sudan and a number of other African nations had practiced it up until only a decade or so ago. The Sunni Arab states had only outlawed it a few decades ago.

   Even today, the taking of slaves is rampant across the Islamic world, wherever it comes into contact with non-Muslim societies. The fierce Janjaweed tribesmen of the Sudan raided Christian and other settlements so frequently and so violently that non-Muslims had to split off and form their own nation, the South Sudan, to gain a measure of peace and tranquility. They had to take arms, as well – for the Jamjaweed were not dissuaded by peaceful requests to stop.

   Slavery has not gone away in the Islamic world; it has simply moved under ground and out of sight of newspapers and TV. Ads in places like the Philippines speak of glamorous high-paying jobs for nannies and governesses for young women in the Arab world; when the applicants arrive, they are taken captive as slaves before they can do anything to stop it.

   Many of the readers of this website are undoubtedly familiar with the notorious grooming gangs who have terrorized Europeans from the U.K. to Sweden to Italy. These young men either strong-arm children and young women into their reach or lure them with money, sweets and other gifts. Once under their control, the captives are addicted to narcotics and made slaves and prostitutes. Most are never seen again by their families.

   Islamic doctrine divides the world into two and only two spheres: Dar al-Islam, which means “The House of Islam/House of Submission,” and Dar al-Harb, which means “The House of War.” All infidel lands and infidels/non-Muslims/kafirs are considered the enemy, regardless of where they reside. It is only when the whole of the world lies inside Dar al-Islam and all are believers that the mujahadeen (holy warriors) may lay down their swords.

   In other words, Islam is a creed of perpetual warfare of the believers against the unbelievers. Most acts of violence which non-Muslims consider to be “terrorism” are actually considered lawful under sharia law as valid acts of jihad, “holy war” in the name of the faith.

3. On March 10, 2025 at 2:35 am, Georgiaboy61 said:

   @ Herschel Smith

   Perhaps you know the storied history of the M1911 pistol in 45 ACP/Auto, namely that its potent 230-grain FMJ “hardball” round came about directly because of the need for a handgun potent-enough to stop charging Islamic Moro tribesmen during the Philippine Insurrection 1898-1913.

   The rifles and shotguns arming American soldiers, sailors and Marines were potent-enough to do the job, but the .38 caliber revolvers then in use proved to be anemic, and not enough to do the job. The Moros, many of whom drugged themselves and also wrapped their extremities tightly using cloth strips to slow bleeding from gunshot and other wounds, proved to be fanatical and committed enemies – and the 38 just wasn’t getting the job done.

   There is evidence to suggest that the M1911 pistol made into U.S. hands in the Philippines for the final campaigns and battles of the insurrection, before the “Juramentados” (“Believers”) were put down for good. The Battle of Bud Bagsak in 1913 is one example.

   During the interval while the M1911 was being developed, many of the old Colt “Peacemakers” were brought out of mothballs and put to their intended use. Since these were in hard-hitting cartridges such as the 45 Colt and 44-40, they probably did the job for the men in the Philippines.

   The famous Texas Ranger Joacquin Jackson, whose career began in 1966, was once asked why he carried a Colt 45 M1911. His reply became legend: “Because they don’t make a Colt 46!”

   Back in the old days between the world wars, the saying was “They all fall to hardball!” They were talking about the 230-grain “hardball” round….

4. On March 10, 2025 at 3:43 am, dave in pa. said:

   I always liked the 185 grain soft nose myself. but 230 grain lead flat nose works really well too. as for the rag heads, this is what they always have done. if they have the numbers, they will make life for anyone not like them hell on earth.
   we used to get into fights with the “turks” back in West Berlin back in the day.
   funny the German cops never gave us any grief about it either. I guessing the way it is now over there, they would like to see G.I.’s pounding the “Turk” bastards again
   then again, maybe not as they did invite them in a few years ago.

5. On March 10, 2025 at 4:10 am, Mark Matis said:

   Europe (including Britain) s owned by the Rothshchilds, and Europe does whatever their owners want done.

6. On March 10, 2025 at 5:20 am, Joe Blow said:

   Its so heartbreaking watching that video, you know those men were driven into the desert and shot dead moments afterwards.
   Which begs the question… and I’ve seen video’s like this before, especially with the cartel and various isis propaganda videos. No doubt the people know they aren’t going to survive this encounter. Why not fight back? Why not resist? Why die on your knee’s begging instead of fighting to take back what is rightfully yours – your life? I’d rather lose it fighting than give it up begging? I don’t understand that. What, you think they’re just going to slap you around in the back of the truck then let you go?

7. On March 10, 2025 at 11:27 am, Georgiaboy61 said:

   @dave in pa.

   Re:” I guessing the way it is now over there, they would like to see G.I.’s pounding the “Turk” bastards again”

   Maybe, but then again, maybe not…

   Europe is today overflowing with Muslims and other “refugees,” “migrants,” or whatever they’re calling them this week – because not withstanding the wishes of ordinary people, the globalist ruling class at the EU in Brussels has flung the door open to them.

   It is no exaggeration to state that ordinary Europeans face two adversaries here: First, the soldiers of Allah themselves, the perpetrators of these violent acts. Second, the authorities and ruling elites who have engineered this gigantic population replacement scheme and are now defending and shielding, in ways great and small, the new arrivals from the consequences of their actions.

   In any civilized society governed under some semblance of the rule of law, a man who murders, rapes, assaults, commits acts of arson, foments unrest in the streets, etc. – would be considered a criminal and thrown in prison if convicted. If a foreign national or recent immigrant, he would also be deported.

   Yet, we see time and again, these young (many are young men of military age) men getting off with a slap on the wrist – or no punishment worth mentioning – for the most-ugly and heinous of crimes. “Once is happenstance, twice is coincidence, three times is enemy action,” to quote Ian Flemming. Once or twice, such leniency can be written off to incompetence or error, but not when such a long-standing pattern emerges. In the infamous Rotherham grooming scandal in the U.K.,
   the authorities have known about the crimes and the gangs for thirty years, yet have done little to stop them!

   In reality, the fact that Muslims can commit most any crime they choose against the kafirs means that places like the U.K., Germany and Sweden are – de facto – already living under sharia (Islamic religious) law, not withstanding the legal codes they have on the books.

8. On March 10, 2025 at 5:27 pm, Steady Steve said:

   Islam and its’ adherents need to be completely wiped out. And no, it’s not genocide as it encompasses many racial groups.

9. On March 10, 2025 at 9:59 pm, Georgiaboy61 said:

   @ Steady Steve

   You don’t know me or have any reason to take advice from me, but perhaps all the same, you will consider doing so.

   Regarding a generalized war against the entire Islamic world….

   Be careful what you wish for – you might just get it.

   Afghanistan is just one relatively small part of the Islamic world, Dar al-Islam, but look what trouble, suffering and privation it has cost us (meaning the U.S. and her allies) these last twenty-odd years since 2001. Not only in blood, suffering and the death of some of our finest young people, but the enormous waste and drain of our resources. Not for nothing is that place known as “The graveyard of empires”….

   The Founders warned us of going abroad in search of monsters to destroy, and they were correct. That is the road to ruin. Not only is the United States nowhere near powerful-enough to undertake such a project, it would result in the destruction of what remains of our republic.

   A better and more-feasible strategy for dealing with the Islamic world is to isolate and quarantine it from the non-Muslim world to the degree possible, and – as stated by military theorist William Lind – “fold it in upon itself.”

10. On March 11, 2025 at 7:02 am, Joe Blow said:

    More and more I find I am in agreement with GeorgiaBoy61 on stuff. This one too.

    However, I tend to try to make decisions binary in my head – just a reduction process I go through when faced with complex problems. Anyone can do it, just ask ‘what then’ or ‘what if’… and repeat, until you can’t.
    My point? Take the comment by Steady Steve that elicited GeorgiaBoy61’s response: Wipe ’em out. If you take a sober view of the world and it’s history the last 2000 years or so, tell me any other outcome that is successful and durable. I’ll wait, we’ve tried for about 1500 years, can’t seem to come up with one.

    When I play that logic game, I inevitably come back to conflict between that religion and the world. And that’s really the crux, as they see it, it’s them vs. the world.

    I’m not a violent guy, truthfully I tell you. But islam needs to be exterminated from this earth. It’s simply not compatible with anything else. It’s not like they tolerate Sihk’s, or maybe they’ll let the buddhists live since they’re so peaceful. Nope, their ‘religion’ demands they rape and kill all non-believers. So you are either converting people to islam and killing the ones who refuse, or you are believer yourself. Binary, nothing in between. Kefir are to be slaughtered, literally says that on page 25 of the holy book.

    That’s their choice, not mine. I believe in letting other people live their lives and worship how they choose, so long as it doesn’t interfere with me…. And that last sentence is a problem for them. So they are the ones who chose this outcome, not me. I am merely following through with it (my God/religion gives me the right to defend my life against trespassers). Christianity preaches tolerance and acceptance, islam teaches domination and subservience. It’s their religion’s choice to pit their followers against everyone else. So be it, you chose your side with your own free will, so that is how you shall live and die.
    People don’t grok that, which is sad. This shit going on in the world, the global stuff, the middle east, that’s what the fighting is about. Who’s religion will be worshipped. The jews are fighting to force everyone onto their plantation, the arabs fighting over which version of their plantation will dominate, and the christians are all running around saying “stop it!” with the strongest lisp and limpest wrist they can muster. Everyone is in an existential tizzy.
    Disgusting, frankly.
    Never once did it occur to the people that they could be wrong (the correct answer was “Mormon”…. Trey Parker, SouthPark)

11. On March 11, 2025 at 5:05 pm, Latigo Morgan said:

    Seems those “godless” Russians are the only ones who give a damn about them.

    https://x.com/CilComLFC/status/1899195963761217713

12. On March 11, 2025 at 5:23 pm, Miles said:

    I remember a former pastor, and still good friend, relating a story told to him by the missionary Peter Hammond.
    He was at a village church service and noticed a tree just outside the entrance festooned with AKs of various models and condition being guarded by a deacon.
    He was informed that even though it was for all intents illegal for the populace to possess arms, the church, village, and near surrounding area had little troubles with the constabulary, or insurgents for that matter.

13. On March 11, 2025 at 9:08 pm, Ozark Redneck said:

    Thanks for bringing this important issue for our discernment and discussion. I agree with all above, this has been an ongoing problem for 1500 years, there is no easy answer. But here at home we must be aware, identify the threat, plan according and be prepared to execute that plan. If you haven’t read “The Attack” by Kurt Schlichter, it is well worth reading.

14. On March 11, 2025 at 11:56 pm, Georgiaboy61 said:

    @ Joe Blow

    Thank you for your comments and your time. You are of course entirely correct that the conflict between Islam and us – between Islam and the rest of humanity – is not one we brought upon ourselves, but that has been trust upon us by the other side.

    There may indeed some a time when something has to be done about it, about the problem. In places like northern and western Europe, it is getting more and more obvious that Germany, Sweden, Britain, France, et al. are not suffering under a crime wave, but a sustained Islamic insurgency. It is getting more difficult by the day for the authorities there to hide this fact, which is one reason why censorship is being increased and the cracking down upon dissidents and protestors is being ratcheted up.

    And if it comes to a broader conflict, then our side must do whatever it takes to win.

    Re: “Seems those ‘godless’ Russians are the only ones who give a damn about them.”

    One of the many reasons the American left hate the Russians at the moment, is that Moscow doesn’t pussy-foot around when it comes to dealing with Islamic aggression. Not only is it in their national DNA going back centuries to the time when the Ottoman Empire and others prayed upon them, recent events such as the Beslan School hostage-standoff have taught the Russians that the Chechens and others like them respect only strength, or as Osama Bin Laden said, “the strong horse”….

    Likewise the nations of Eastern Europe, i.e., Poland, Czechia, Slovakia, Hungary, et al. who have also suffered under the whip hand of Islam down through the years.

    One of the primary reasons the Russians would make very good allies in a conflict against the Islamic world is that they would allow the U.S. and the rest of the nations allied with Moscow to be energy-independent. Since at the first sign of such a conflict, the Sunni Arabs would surely embargo the West.

    @ Miles

    I am familiar with Dr. Peter Hammond; he and his people are very brave indeed going where they go and doing what they do. He was witness to the decades-long liquidation of Sudanese Christians and other sectarian minorities in Sudan when General Omar al-Barshir was in power, the Islamic dictator and head of Sudan for many years. The general used the Sudanese Air Force, specifically Hind helicopter gunships, to attack and raze Christian villages, churches, etc. from the air. Straight-up mass murder; no reason to attack other than the fact that they were infidels.

    @ Ozark Redneck

    Agreed, Schlicter’s book “The Attack” is a good read and worth the time…

    Matt Bracken’s “The Red Cliffs of Zerhoun” is not only informative, but a great adventure story, if you have the chance to look at it.

15. On March 12, 2025 at 6:29 pm, Steady Steve said:

    Joe Blow (great screen name BTW) you understand perfectly. Islam can never, will never have peace with the non Muslim world. Right now Europe is being conquered by the Muslim horde. Looks like the East Europeans will have to do the heavy lifting again in driving them out. Eventually the US will have to ban any Islamic immigration as their religion/political system is not compatible with our Constitution. As it is the god they worship is not that of our fathers but His enemy.

16. On March 12, 2025 at 11:36 pm, Georgiaboy61 said:

    @Steady Steve

    Most current-day Americans don’t know it – civics and our early national history not being taught very well if at all these days – that several of the Founding Fathers debated the pros-and-cons of adding an amendment to the U.S. Constitution prohibiting the exercise of Islam within the new republic of the United States of America.

    Thomas Jefferson, John Adams and John Quincy Adams debated and discussed the issues at length, and all three men had to make national defense decisions relating to our relations with the Islamic world, i.e., at that time, the Barbary Pirates of Tripoli, et al.

    A new nation, the U.S. was quite poor and consequently when the jihadists/pirates of the Pasha of Tripoli took several American-flagged vessels and their crews hostage and demanded ransom monies be paid. Back in the U.S. President Adams reluctantly paid the ransom – but that did not end the attacks.

    When Thomas Jefferson took office, he faced the same problem, and finally threw caution to the wind and authorized the U.S. Navy and Marine Corps to raid the port of Tripoli, free our hostages, and give the pasha a bloody nose he would not soon forget. That highly-successful raid is now immortalized in the Marine Corps Hymn, i.e., “… To the shores of Tripoli…” and went down as the very first war we fought as an independent nation.

    Why was an amendment not passed banning Islam? Probably because the Founders could not imagine a time would ever come when it would become necessary.

17. On March 18, 2025 at 9:38 am, Bradley Graham said:

    Make sure to get a copy of the book ” Sword and Scimitar” by Raymond Ibrahim.
    The so called religion of peace is ready and willing to slaughter at the drop of a hat.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Leave a comment