What If Millions Of People Get Gun Suppressors?
BY Herschel Smith
7 years, 8 months ago
The debate is whether the benefits of more silencers would outweigh the costs.
Really? There’s such a debate?
Silencers are “used to conceal the fact that you are firing a weapon,” said Rep. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.). “There will be more crimes committed, more people killed” if the current bill passes.
Ah, I see. Chicken little runs on stage. “The sky is falling. The sky is falling.”
But it gets better.
Not everyone is convinced that shooting-related hearing loss is a problem that needs another solution.
“You already have the answer,” said Kris Brown, chief strategy officer at the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence. “There are things available on the market to protect hearing.”
Why are gun controllers so anti-science? And here I thought the answer to the question was that if millions of gun owners get suppressors, they will get a better cheek weld on their rifles and prevent hearing loss.
|
|
On March 14, 2017 at 10:50 am, Archer said:
And here I thought the answer to the question was that if millions of gun owners get suppressors, they will get a better cheek weld on their rifles….
[sarcasm]
You mean to say, mass shooters will be able to aim better and become even more deadly, right?
[/sarcasm]
Because according to the anti-freedom crowd, any gun owner is nothing more than a mass shooting waiting to happen.
On March 14, 2017 at 1:00 pm, Jack Crabb said:
Anti-gunners continue to prove on a regular basis that they are liberty-hating fools incapable of rational, logical thought, and in many cases, honesty.
On March 14, 2017 at 1:00 pm, Jack Crabb said:
Anti-gunners continue to prove on a regular basis that they are liberty-hating fools incapable of rational, logical thought, and in many cases, honesty.
On March 15, 2017 at 1:58 am, Henry said:
“There are things available on the market to protect hearing.”
Them earlobe things… that go up.