Montana Considers Gun Nullification Bill
BY Herschel Smith7 years, 8 months ago
The House of Representatives gave preliminary approval Tuesday to a bill meant to preserve Montanans’ right to bear arms by prohibiting the enforcement of any federal ban on firearms.
Senate Bill 99 would establish the “Montana Federal Firearm, Magazine, and Ammunition Ban Enforcement Prohibition Act.” The bill passed out of the Senate in February on a 30-20 vote.
Republican Rep. Seth Berglee is carrying the bill in the House for Republican Sen. Cary Smith.
“We did add a couple of amendments to it to allow for federal assistance, as long as it is not for the primary purpose of prohibiting, restricting or requiring any of the federal bans,” Berglee said.
At the bill’s first hearing in the House, lobbyist for School Administrators of Montana Patrick Audet opposed the bill. He says the bill would allow firearms on school campuses.“If an officer couldn’t enforce that law, that would be a problem. We would be opposed to that,” Audet said.
Kansas had a similar law called the Second Amendment Protection Act. Two gentlemen then got caught up in the web of cowardice when one of them fabricated and sold a suppressor, and the other one bought it. Both men were found guilty of violation of the NFA. And what did the brave patriots in Kansas do about it? They did nothing.
I warned future “patriots” about this sort of thing.
I’ve said before, don’t even consider something like nullification unless you’re willing to go the mattresses for your people. The lawmakers could have handed the governor the tools to deal with the federal intrusion, and the governor could have had the balls to do it.
But none of this obtained, and the citizens suffered as a result. Unless you’re willing to arrest federal agents who attempt to enforce these laws and throw them in the state penitentiary with the other prisoners, don’t even consider nullification.
Nullification laws made for show are immoral. Nullification laws made for real are admirable, but states have to be willing to back it all up with force.
I see no difference between suppressors and any other kind of firearm or associated equipment. If Montana actually intends to enforce this law against federal agents who attempt to arrest people when they run afoul of federal laws, current or future, then I applaud this law.
On the other hand, if it’s another gimmick for votes or show-law for the purpose of making a statement, or in other words, if this law will have no teeth because Montana has the same kind of cowards in government and law enforcement as Kansas, then stop right here.
Don’t do it. It’s time for a gut check for Montanans. What will it be?
No comments yet.
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL
Leave a comment