Under Obama There Came To Be A Cancer In the Pentagon
BY Herschel Smith5 years, 1 month ago
Do you remember when Obama started purging the upper echelons in the Pentagon, sometimes under cover of law, sometimes under cover of darkness? After the pullout from Iraq, Obama had a little list of those people he didn’t want to see serving anymore in America’s military. Some he fired outright. Others he treated so shabbily that they had no option put to leave.
Just in the first five years of his presidency, Obama fired almost 200 military officers:
[W]hat has happened to our officer corps since President Obama took office is viewed in many quarters as unprecedented, baffling and even harmful to our national security posture. We have commented on some of the higher profile cases, such as Gen. Carter Ham. He was relieved as head of U.S. Africa Command after only a year and a half because he disagreed with orders not to mount a rescue mission in response to the Sept. 11, 2012, attack in Benghazi.
Rear Adm. Chuck Gaouette, commander of the John C. Stennis Carrier Strike Group, was relieved in October 2012 for disobeying orders when he sent his group on Sept. 11 to “assist and provide intelligence for” military forces ordered into action by Gen. Ham.
[ … ]
Retired Army Major General Paul Vallely: The White House protects their own. That’s why they stalled on the investigation into fast and furious, Benghazi and Obamacare. He’s intentionally weakening and gutting our military, Pentagon and reducing us as a superpower, and anyone in the ranks who disagrees or speaks out is being purged.
I know some readers have brought this up in the past, but it’s good to see some folks have gone public with Obama’s treachery.
One interesting factoid for me is that I’d never seen in publication before that General Carter Ham was relieved because he disagreed with the decision not to mount a rescue.
Benghazi is on the Obama administration’s shoulders. God will hold them accountable in eternity. They are murderers.
On October 30, 2019 at 8:40 am, George said:
Obama is in fact a mass murderer. He ordered the overthrow of the Ukrainian, Libyan, Syrian and Egyptian governments. In Syria alone the number of innocent dead cannot be rounded off to the nearest 100,000. Christian communities that existed for thousands of years were decimated, the people killed by Islamist forces, many of Obama’s and his minions making. Those who managed to live were scattered to the winds. Remember the famous photo of John McCain meeting with the “good terrorists” with Al Baghdadi himself in the photo.
Trump continues the terrorism. Get of of Syria my rear end. We have deployed more soldiers to “protect” the oilfields. Can someone tell me where we get the moral or legal authority to sequester the resources of another country from that country? Resources that might be used to rebuild a country that WE helped destroy for some nefarious reason.
On October 30, 2019 at 10:33 am, Fred said:
George,
Yep, Hussein Obama is responsible for the deaths of perhaps half a million Christians in the middle east through the four “wars” you mention. Christians in Egypt are literally and actually crucified for Christ due to Obama. And baby bush is responsible for all the Christians killed in Iraq but hey, we need to protect Israel even if it means killing every last Christian on earth who isn’t a Zionist.
From the article: “viewed in many quarters as unprecedented, baffling and even harmful to our national security posture.”
What quarters are those? Retard quarters where people don’t know what a Communist Revolution looks like, and no, Trump is not stopping the Revolution at all but is accelerating it by Red Flag weapon seizures based upon a person beliefs and by profligate spending, and increased Police State funding and support. There are those who are thinking that Trump is a plant, after all he’s a New York liberal who’s shown no attempt at actually curtailing anything that he said he would and the true believer’s in him are unknowingly or unwittingly useful idiots further helping the Revolution by playing right into it’s hands.
On October 30, 2019 at 11:16 am, George said:
Fred: With regard to Iraq. You might convince someone that the CIA was incompetent enough to believe that Iraq was developing nuclear weapons. Maybe. But I will never believe that Mossad did not know what was going on. Not much goes on in Israel’s backyard that they do not know about.
So IMHO the Israeli Prime Minister was lying through his teeth when he told Congress that Huessin was developing nukes. Israel just wanted US to take out Saddam for them and we did.
On October 30, 2019 at 1:01 pm, Fred said:
“…we need to protect Israel even if it means killing every last Christian on earth who isn’t a Zionist.”
This was /sarc. I should have warned you. I was there in daddy “NWO” bush’s Desert Storm, albeit comfortable in the AC far from battle but, it was OBVIOUSLY nothing but a battlefield prep job. That we later invaded, and under baby bush to boot, wasn’t even mildly news to me. I’m not exactly a fan of the Israeli regime (warning: this is a sarcastic understatement), although I do admire their nationalism and sadly lament that ours is not as robust and unapologetic as theirs( Not sarc).
On October 30, 2019 at 1:41 pm, George said:
Thanks for your service Fred.
Take Care