Professor Mark Smith Breaks Down The Rahimi Case
BY Herschel Smith
1 year, 4 months ago
It would be nice if the justices saw Garland’s ploy for what it is, i.e., to amend the protocol in the NYSRPA v. Bruen case (analogue laws at the time of the founding as the only justification for a gun control law today). Garland and the rest of the communists in NY, Illinois, Hawaii, Massachusetts, New Jersey and elsewhere utterly hate the Bruen decision. You see, they know the Bruen test should force them to lose the case, but they are going for the sympathy vote, and if they get it, the SCOTUS will have violated its on standard, thus modifying the Bruen protocol.
It would be nice if the SCOTUS didn’t just ignore the fact that Rahimi is a fairy bad actor and celebrate it as an example of constitutional protections for everyone, not just those whom the communists feel have good moral character. That standard is malleable and will go to serve no one’s interests except for the communists.
But I doubt that all of the justices who voted in the affirmative for Bruen will find the same way in Rahimi. I doubt that Roberts, Barrett and Cavanaugh will be on our side.
Mark Smith breaks the case down.
No comments yet.
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL
Leave a comment