Ron Spomer On The 6mm ARC
BY Herschel Smith![](https://www.captainsjournal.com/wp-content/themes/CJ2/img/time.gif)
I’ve seen a lot on the 6mm ARC lately, all of it good.
Sort of mixed up results.
Here’s my take with this and all of the other tests I’ve seen. The 45ACP does just fine expanding within the window and accomplishing the correct penetration.
Speeding it up doesn’t necessarily help with JHPs. Stick with 45ACP or +P 45 (or if you wish, +P+ 45ACP) for self defense purposes and shoot JHP.
For hard cast ball like we would need in the bush, that’s where more velocity helps. Always carry +P or +P+ hard ball in the bush. I carry 450 SMC (or at a minimum, Underwood, Double Tap or Buffalo Bore +P+). For shooting 450 SMC, as I’ve discussed before, I had to modify a 1911 by removing the 18# spring and installing a 22# spring. There was no change to the barrel. It will achieve 1120 FPS with a 230 grain bullet. If I intended to shoot 45 Super, I would get a different barrel (or go with 460 Rowland).
In urban and suburban areas, over-penetration is always a concern. So to summarize, I’m not entirely sure why you would choose 45 Super with a JHP style bullet for any scenario.
I could probably watch him dig a ditch and make it interesting. On top of that, I learned something.
Zero with the best ammunition you will shoot, and use that for self defense. Otherwise, I agree with him. Buy what you want, but don’t expect the same performance.
This is also a reminder that shortened barrel lengths (seemingly all the rage now) create this same problem.
Seen at Gun Feed, Norma is making a move.
CHATHAM COUNTY, Ga. — An ammunition manufacturer is relocating its U.S. headquarters to Chatham County.
Norma Precision Ammunition is a subsidiary of the leading European ammunition manufacturer RUAG Ammotec.
The Swiss-based company says it develops and produces high-end ammunition for sports shooters, special operations forces, and peace officers worldwide.
“With their facilities in close proximity to the Port of Savannah – the top port for U.S. exports – and our highly-skilled pool of talent, I’m confident that RUAG Ammotec will be very pleased with their decision to invest in the Peach State,” said Georgia Governor Brian Kemp.
“I am pleased with all that Georgia has to offer our company. I am confident that with our relocation, we have chosen the right community to partner with to ensure mutual long-term success,” added President and CEO of RUAG Ammotec Christoph Eisenhardt.
RUAG Ammotec has operations in 12 different countries. The company says in 2021, Norma Precision Ammunition imported over 400 containers of ammunition from factories in Europe, while also delivering over 30 million cartridges of ammunition made in the U.S.
But are they really moving their headquarters? Where is it currently?
I couldn’t locate their headquarters, unless it’s a Swiss city. These two articles (here and here) seem to suggest that there isn’t currently one in the U.S., and they are establishing one in Georgia.
This continues gun valley moving South, or in this case, gun valley choosing South. See also Parts I, II and III.
By the way, I’ve never had any problems with Norma ammunition, and it’s always performed well for me,
“Magnum” is the perfect name for this cartridge because it does for the .22 rimfire what the .30-378 Weatherby Magnum did for the .308 Winchester: makes it shoot faster, flatter, and hit harder. And that’s been the trajectory of .22 rimfire cartridges since 1845.
Ron has a really interesting table of windage hold-offs and elevation hold-overs too.
I really love the .22 WMR, and with the advent of reliable ARs chambered in this cartridge, it’s become a legitimate home defense gun.
Although I choose to use something much bigger bore, America’s cartridge (from youth through adulthood) has always chambered the .22 caliber bullet, from the .22LR to the .22 WMR to the .223.
I learned to shoot using a .22LR plinking at trash can lids in my backyard. But the .22LR has always seemed a bit underpowered to me.
Andy with practical accuracy sends me a note with a video he did as a challenge from a commenter here at TCJ.
First of all, it’s nice to be in the mix of thing where you can affect outcomes like testing of weapons systems. Second, his results are interesting and seem to me to put to bed the notion that a 1:9 twist rate can’t stabilize a 77 grain bullet. This is the same thing Steve Mayer at Rock River Arms told me several years ago. But it’s nice to see it tested.
By the way, nice shooting Andy. A 1 MOA group is always good in my book.
And a change in load means that that the 20 gauge (and even 410) is now being used much more for turkey hunting.