For One Colorado Rancher, An AR-15 Is A Tool To Protect His Herd
BY Herschel Smith
That day, Scott had laid out some of his guns on the kitchen table. He isn’t sure how many he owns.
“I’d have to count them all,” he said with a chuckle. “Twenty-five to 30 I’m guessing. Just off the top of my head.”
Scott goes through his collection of firearms, some family heirlooms, some purchased, from hunting rifles to handguns, describing how they work and what kind of ammunition they take.
And then, the gun that scares everybody in the world,” Scott said as he unzipped a soft black case. “This is [an] AR-15 … And it’s a semi-automatic … I’m just as proud of that gun or this AR as, say, somebody on the Front Range that owns a GTO or a Mustang, a classic car.”
The AR-15 is a widely owned, semi-automatic rifle.
For many, it has a distinctively threatening look, from the color (black), to its pistol grip. While the AR-15 has been used in recent mass shootings, it accounts for a small percentage of firearm murders.
But when Scott hears people say things like, ‘Why would anybody have one except to kill people?” he has an answer:
“This is our No.1 defense against predators for our cattle,” he explained.
[ … ]
The cows need to be protected from predators, especially during calving season when coyotes and mountain lions are drawn into the barn by the scent of afterbirth.
The AR-15 is what Scott grabs on a winter night when he needs to stop a coyote before it eats one of the cows or newborns.
“For me, it’s the way its held,” he explained. “I’m more accurate with it, especially at night … I can hit coyotes, especially when they’re running.”
JJ prefers a .30-06, a traditional hunting rifle, because, Scott says, it has more “knock-down power.”
“[A] tool. I don’t look at it as a gun-gun,” Scott said. “I know some people are afraid of ’em. Some people are obsessed with them. I myself, I just see ’em as a gun.”
“We use ours more towards protecting our livestock,” he said. “We do hunt as a family and harvest the meat to feed our family, but it’s more like a tool than it is a weapon.”
[ … ]
Scott feels that if his guns were taken away or heavily restricted, his way of life would somehow change. But guns, of course, affect communities in different ways, especially in the context of gun violence.
He agrees that there should be some restrictions on guns to reduce gun violence. Instead of more regulations, he would prefer to “fine tune” existing regulations like background checks.
“The problem that we face as Americans today is too many people have just drawn the line,” said Scott. “They’re 100 percent anti-gun or 100 percent ‘Oh NRA, yeah, yeah, yeah.’ I’m in the middle there. I’m not pro-rally NRA, [though] I am an NRA member. On the other hand, [they’re] saying all guns are bad. And that’s not true.”
I have to say, Scott, that I don’t see you or this author as an ally at all. First of all, while you have an answer for why you need a semiautomatic rifle, so do I, regardless of the fact that I’m not in the bush protecting my herd.
You see, there are threats wherever you live, some four-legged, some two-legged. And I am suspecting that the author wouldn’t give me so much credence as [s]he did you.
Next, while you had me with your story about protecting your herd with AR-15s, which I do see as the perfect weapon for this, I’m not with you at all on the need for fine-tuning background checks.
You’re just engaging in myth-making, the same myth-making in which the progressives traffic. That more scrutiny will make anyone safer.
We have a word for you. It’s called Fudd. You and your ilk assist the controllers rather than hinder their plans. And you will have a target on your back just like all other AR-15 owners, regardless of the fact that you need one to defend your herd. There will be no exceptions, and increased scrutiny is only the first of many steps they intend to take.
You’ll learn soon enough.